Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 27-12-2011 05:34 (25-12-2011 00:52 )eccles Wrote: Not strictly an Ofcom story as it is self-censorship but what the heck... Speaking of which... Dave and GOLD are just as bad, regularly hacking our favourite sitcoms to pieces. Just showed the Brave Alan episode from I'm Alan Partridge... this was shown in the early hours of the morning (probably not the first showing, but I've never seen this series aired before the watershed anyway) and the episode's best line, "Don't rub your fanny on me!" was chopped out in its entirety. What is the matter with these fucking people? When are broadcasters going to grow some balls and stop being so fucking terrified of offending people? The Great Unwashed British Public - shylok - 27-12-2011 09:24 I thought I'd post this to illustrate a point. Image 1 (below) is from an OFCOM regulated (over 18) adult channel in the UK: Image 2 (below) is from a kids music show on European TV channel OTV: Both caps were made at around 0900GMT this morning. See how oppressed we are in the UK by the state censor OFCOM! Let this be a lesson to those in the free world (unlike the UK) don't let fascists like OFCOM get in media control in your countries!!! Shylok RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 28-12-2011 18:10 Well I've not been on this forum for some time now down to various reasons mainly due to the fact of work commitments aswell as what with this being Christmas plenty of drinking, family get together's and meeting up with friends and I've only just sobered up today so last night was the first time in ages I'd bothered to tune into the babe channels taking into account that alcohol has been a much more worthwhile way to get my kicks as it's about the only thing that Ofcom don't have in say in yet and what I seen last night was same old story with Ofcom written all over the whole spectrum of shows which literally sent me to sleep as they were all so dull, uninspiring and boring, 2012 will mark it 9 years since Ofcom came into existence and ripped the bloody heart out of all late night entertainment and I'll be glad to see the back of 2011 and can only hope that 2012 is the year of change as this surely can't continue to go on with Ofcom pissing off just about all the channels this year and I think the overwhelming feeling is that they should get to fuck and be disbanded asap, anyway I hope you all had a good Christmas and that this long road to the abolition of censorship is met in 2012 which I hope all comes to a head and that we are discussing the shows in a more positive manner than we are at present RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 28-12-2011 19:05 I agree with you 100% mate, 2011 is a year I want to forget, let's hope 2012 will be a far more brighter and positive year for our Babe channels at long last, and let's hope Ofcom will finally collapse RE: Ofcom Discussion - Suurbier - 29-12-2011 10:20 I hope I'm not being too gloomy but.... When the Coalition came to power in 2010 they anounced the end of the quango however 2011 failed to realise that dream. if anything certain bodies have become even more powerful!!!! Anyway here's hoping 2012 will see the changes a modern thinking 21st century deserves RE: Ofcom Discussion - arron88 - 29-12-2011 21:00 (26-12-2011 18:59 )continental19 Wrote: Ofcom will eventually fall, there's no doubt in my my mind, I'm still wandering if another private regulator will step in and challenge them? whether or not this will happen in 2012 is anyones guess. (29-12-2011 10:20 )Suurbier Wrote: I hope I'm not being too gloomy but.... Offcom will still be here in 3 years time. You're in for a long wait for Offcom closedown. Gov. has no reason to close/replace them. The channels should think about what they'd do when the current satellite [EB 1] they use fails in orbit/isn't replaced. RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 30-12-2011 03:05 Good point, the Russians arent having much luck launching new satellites at the moment. Perhaps those nice Americans will let some of their drones transmit signals from low altitude. Or barrage balloons. Its got to be cheaper and we might actually get local TV. RE: Ofcom Discussion - jimmyt73 - 02-01-2012 13:36 i just wondered if anyone saw the terminator 3 film shown pre watershed on watch with no pin protection at the weekend it seems to me that depictions of kids being executed before 9 pm are potentially far more damaging than a babeshows content 4hours afterwards. also wondered how much of new activity has to be shown to be a generally accepted standard please could someone clarify this for me because if all the babeshow providers agree to feature one similar thing such as nipple sucking could it not become a generally accepted standard, p.s if u can make the explantion in lamens terms as im currently out of a job many thanks RE: Ofcom Discussion - blackjaques - 02-01-2012 20:52 (02-01-2012 13:36 )jimmyt73 Wrote: i just wondered if anyone saw the terminator 3 film shown pre watershed on watch with no pin protection at the weekend it seems to me that depictions of kids being executed before 9 pm are potentially far more damaging than a babeshows content 4hours afterwards. Yes, good points. The problem is though that, with Ocon, violence is generally OK. It's sexual content that they have the biggest issue with. They are doing their darndest to keep explicit sex off UK TV. Everything else then gets the "Pyramid Treatment". i.e. censorship accordingly. RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 02-01-2012 22:30 (02-01-2012 20:52 )blackjaques Wrote:(02-01-2012 13:36 )jimmyt73 Wrote: i just wondered if anyone saw the terminator 3 film shown pre watershed on watch with no pin protection at the weekend it seems to me that depictions of kids being executed before 9 pm are potentially far more damaging than a babeshows content 4hours afterwards. They don't mind uncensored penises, full frontal women and men getting banged in the ass on Sexcetera though |