+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Studio66 & OnlyFans (/showthread.php?tid=74869)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - ShandyHand - 26-12-2018 14:43
^ I have no beef with the general facts as you give them. I too have heard the stories. I am only trying to ascertain if there was any concrete change backing russmeyer's post. You must admit that some babes put a different spin on things to your basics. Like 66 changed the nature of what was on offer to individual babes half way through.
How do you account for winsaw's info that Lola wasn't told of the required cut when she rejoined? Surely that is highly pertinent info to the contract she will have signed?
I take it you believe all babes that are still at 66 are now paying the operator the 30% requested if they are still on OF?
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - HEX!T - 26-12-2018 18:27
yeah they put a spin on it especially the 1s who decided to leave.
caty cole left accusing s66 of being part of a credit card scam or at the very least knew about it and did nothing.
yet i dont see any hm tax and revenue or ofcom/ata investigations.
Valentina on the other hand gave a full account of the options she was given and they are listed in my other post.
she wasnt bothered about dressing shit up, as she was already leaving before the OF fiasco started, so to me had little reason to moan at s66.
my last source...
sorry thats staying private as she will know who i am if i repeat verbatim what she said.
but again i have no reason to doubt her as shes stayed. i will qualify all this in that the info im giving was from the first 2 weeks of fallout from the drama...
since then i havent bothered with the cams coz XMAS
as for all the babes... no mate some closed there accounts or just put them to sleep.
others kept theres open and are paying the 30% tieth.
i doubt s66 will backtrack on that amount unless the girl had an only fans that was earning before she joined s66
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - ShandyHand - 26-12-2018 19:53
^ Thanks for that, especially what specifics you could give on where and when this info was given to you.
I of course meant babes that decided to keep their OF's are paying up.
But that's a very good point about an incoming babe who's OF is perfectly established. Must be hard for 66 to argue they are contributing to her take there.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - Rob169 - 11-03-2019 20:38
so after all the hyp about the onlyfans carry on quite a few of the girls seem to be popping up again abeit on babestation, does this mean the fanboys didn't follow them onto their pages without any tv exposure
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - GiorgioT - 24-03-2019 14:22
(11-03-2019 20:38 )Rob169 Wrote: so after all the hyp about the onlyfans carry on quite a few of the girls seem to be popping up again abeit on babestation, does this mean the fanboys didn't follow them onto their pages without any tv exposureInteresting how all the change is happening. I don't think conventional media will be forgotten entirely but sites like OF, socialvip.me, admireme have definitely shaken things up.
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - jammie82uk - 25-03-2019 13:02
(11-03-2019 20:38 )Rob169 Wrote: so after all the hyp about the onlyfans carry on quite a few of the girls seem to be popping up again abeit on babestation, does this mean the fanboys didn't follow them onto their pages without any tv exposure
It doesn’t mean that at all Most of the girls didn’t want to leave tv anyway but felt they had no choice but to leave
Why does the fact that they have been asked to go back to tv been deemed as a backwards step
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - geoffh - 25-03-2019 13:13
(25-03-2019 13:02 )jammie82uk Wrote:(11-03-2019 20:38 )Rob169 Wrote: so after all the hyp about the onlyfans carry on quite a few of the girls seem to be popping up again abeit on babestation, does this mean the fanboys didn't follow them onto their pages without any tv exposure
It doesn’t mean that at all Most of the girls didn’t want to leave tv anyway but felt they had no choice but to leave
Why does the fact that they have been asked to go back to tv been deemed as a backwards step
it isn't deemed a backward step, just that some of the girls egos at the time left a lot to be desired
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - docutech - 25-03-2019 18:15
(11-03-2019 20:38 )Rob169 Wrote: so after all the hyp about the onlyfans carry on quite a few of the girls seem to be popping up again abeit on babestation, does this mean the fanboys didn't follow them onto their pages without any tv exposure
I wouldn't class myself as a fanboy but I do like to indulge a girl more than just 'get your tits out' yes, but yes your right the TV exposure / chat is very important to me so any move to Only Fans solely did nothing for me and killed off 'our relationship' once they left S66
It would have to be someone I rated highly as a person / friend / huge turn on etc to keep my interest just using Only Fans.
Ps won't be picking up either on Babestation which I rate as a poor substitute for 66
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - jammie82uk - 25-03-2019 21:23
(25-03-2019 13:13 )geoffh Wrote:(25-03-2019 13:02 )jammie82uk Wrote:(11-03-2019 20:38 )Rob169 Wrote: so after all the hyp about the onlyfans carry on quite a few of the girls seem to be popping up again abeit on babestation, does this mean the fanboys didn't follow them onto their pages without any tv exposure
It doesn’t mean that at all Most of the girls didn’t want to leave tv anyway but felt they had no choice but to leave
Why does the fact that they have been asked to go back to tv been deemed as a backwards step
it isn't deemed a backward step, just that some of the girls egos at the time left a lot to be desired
Was it ego? Or was it just being fed up with being messed around with mixed messages
Most girls had agreed to the 30% cut and then in the next step for that to be taken away and to be told they would have to close their page or at least stop posting on it
Some agreed with that demand some didn’t, when the ones who didn’t agree said they was leaving the 30% offer appeared on the table again
RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - mrbates59 - 25-03-2019 22:40
(25-03-2019 13:13 )geoffh Wrote:(25-03-2019 13:02 )jammie82uk Wrote:(11-03-2019 20:38 )Rob169 Wrote: so after all the hyp about the onlyfans carry on quite a few of the girls seem to be popping up again abeit on babestation, does this mean the fanboys didn't follow them onto their pages without any tv exposure
It doesn’t mean that at all Most of the girls didn’t want to leave tv anyway but felt they had no choice but to leave
Why does the fact that they have been asked to go back to tv been deemed as a backwards step
it isn't deemed a backward step, just that some of the girls egos at the time left a lot to be desired
Honestly, women don't understand men, period. Men like variety, not just a variety of pics/vids from the same women all the time. Sure, we have our "faves," but eventually you want to see something else. Take pornstars for example; no matter how popular they are, they've always made more money working with the big studios than they have when they've choses to open their own website. It's always been that way.