+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 03-01-2012 22:15
(03-01-2012 21:35 )Grawth Wrote: For further proof look no further than this week's Sherlock.
As was helpfully pointed out by the Daily Mail it was broadcast pre-watershed (8:10 I think) and featured a naked dominatrix flicking a whip across Holmes' face!!
Put that on an adult channel at midnight and watch the fines rain down!!
Typically for the Daily Mail, they have their facts wrong. By the time the whipping scene comes along she's wearing an overcoat. She is supposedly naked before this, but nothing is actually seen.
24 mins in for those that can't be arsed looking for the scene in question:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p00m5wm9/Sherlock_Series_2_A_Scandal_in_Belgravia/
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 04-01-2012 21:37
Cheer's for the link Stan, from what I seen you could see more on the babe channels, in saying that you wouldn't expect to see this type of scene anyway on a drama such as this
but the BBC as we all know are untouchable, they are protected by the Government so they cannot be fined, warned or face being revoked. All I can say is if I was in a family household watching this type of scene I'd be highly embarrassed and would probably pick up the newspaper and hope the scene pass's through very quickly, I also noticed that no prior warning was given to the viewer's over the scene in question. On the subject of the babe channels, anybody who choose's to watch them should know what to expect and that is something Ofcom are really missing the point over 
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 12-01-2012 00:39
This is by no means intended to stir up excitement or even to suggest things are on the up, but on a positive note for a change, here's a couple of things I've observed over the last few weeks:
Proper, over-the-knicker pussy rubbing from some girls, seemingly tolerated by cameraman/producers. Nothing like the close-up gussets shots of prolonged stimulation like we used to get, but I've spotted it a few times just recently.
More interaction during the 2-4-1s, including tit fondling and arse slapping (a very firm no-no not that long ago)
Provocative clothing creeping back into the dayshows.
No giant leaps, for sure, and no where near what, as adults, we should expect from these shows. These are merely an observation.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 12-01-2012 01:01
Yes well I see where you are coming from Stan in many way's, however the babe channels are allways going to be like a bloody yoyo, as soon as you think they are having an upturn in fortune, up steps Ofcom and hammers them right left and centre with a massive fine and a severe warning, just take one look at Elite these days, it's like a worn rag, it's had that much bullshit from Ofcom in recent year's it has simply stopped trying anymore, I remember in particular the fantastic 2 for 1's we used to get from Caty Cole and Charlie O'neil which consisted of much (naked) arse slapping and other antics, now Elite is just painful viewing these days, unusual to see you so optimistic Stan but until Ofcom are permantly removed from the equation we're never going to see a truly great consistant period coming from any of the babe channels.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 12-01-2012 05:30
(12-01-2012 01:01 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [...] unusual to see you so optimistic Stan...
Well I certainly wouldn't go that far, SB. The things I mention are by no means a nightly occurrence. They're little more than the flickerings of a dying candle.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 13-01-2012 22:46
This comedian sums up being offended to a tee, if only Ofcom would see it the same way
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 18-01-2012 01:06
Christian Broadcasting Council Wrote:• Are there any regions, areas or audiences (such as the devolved nations) which may require separate consideration, and why?
CBC believes that Parliament has a role to protect the citizen consumer from indecency (e.g. child pornography) or libel or illegal surveillance but not much else. CBC believes that children and especially children under 7 years old need to be safeguarded in all regulation regarding media plurality as children below this age are unable to tell the difference between editorial and advertisements. Therefore the connection between media companies and the makers of children’s’ toys needs to be taken into account when scrutiny is undertaken of media plurality.
Taken from the Christian Broadcasting Council response to the Ofcom consultation on plurality. The question was not about sexual content, but interesting all the same. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/916359/responses/cbc.pdf
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 21-01-2012 01:46
Iran's Press TV loses UK licence
Iranian news network Press TV has had its licence revoked by the media regulator Ofcom and will no longer be allowed to broadcast in the UK.
Ofcom said the state broadcaster's English language outlet had breached several broadcasting licence rules over editorial control of the channel.
Press TV has also failed to pay a £100,000 fine imposed last year.
The channel called the decision "a clear example of censorship". It will be removed from Sky on 20 January.
The £100,000 fine was imposed last year after the network broadcast an interview with imprisoned Newsweek and Channel 4 journalist Maziar Bahari, which the Ofcom said had been conducted under duress.
Ofcom said Press TV had "indicated it is unwilling and unable to pay".
It was during the investigation into the Bahari interview that the media regulator formed the impression that editorial decisions on the channel were being controlled by the offices in Tehran, instead of the UK.
Press TV was given the opportunity to respond and make the relevant amendments needed to comply with the broadcasting code, but "failed to make the necessary application", Ofcom said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-16652356
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Boomerangutangangbang - 22-01-2012 18:41
18.00 on a Sunday, Time Team family viewing yet they spend 5 or so minutes discussing & showing a find.A phallic symbol.Wind forward to 21.00 & beyond to the Babeshows Adult viewing & there'll be no mention of cock,let alone see any, phallic or otherwise.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 22-01-2012 22:40
(22-01-2012 18:41 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: 18.00 on a Sunday, Time Team family viewing yet they spend 5 or so minutes discussing & showing a find.A phallic symbol.Wind forward to 21.00 & beyond to the Babeshows Adult viewing & there'll be no mention of cock,let alone see any, phallic or otherwise.
Not to mention Baldrick, generally reckoned to be a tit.
Had the misfortune to see Along Came Polly, a Jennifer Aniston-Ben Stiller piece of romcom/fart crap on Five yesterfay lunchtime (12:50-14:30). One scene, while I was eating lunch, has Ben Stiller having a noisy dihorrea attack. Offensive. Then he blocks the loo, floods the bathroom, Jennifer Aniston rushes in and he holds up the excerement stained cloth he used because there was no toilet paper left. Offensive again. And at some stage Im pretty sure they were on a bed getting down to it when the phone goes. The Broadcast Code imposes an absolute ban on representations of intercourse before the watershed (rule 1.20).
"Mummy what are they doing?"
"Well petal, Jen has an itch and Ben is jiggling back and forward to relieve it."
"I see Mummy. The au pair must be very itchy."