RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Big Boobies - 06-07-2010 18:47
(06-07-2010 16:07 )Mastes1 Wrote: (05-07-2010 23:10 )Donsman Wrote: I thought it was called BABEstation, not the Lolly show, she seems to have been on all night, dont agree with giving certain Pornstars all the air time
Probably because she draws the most callers, she's very popular and Babestation is a business after all.
YES but we dont all like her;and you can have too much of some things! SORRY.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rogerbee - 06-07-2010 19:29
Not long ago, I would have agreed with you. My week out gave me time to regroup and reassess. It was actually Daryl and not Lolly herself that made me realise that I'd been caught up way too much in everything I didn't like and didn't want. It turned out that, in reality, Lolly wasn't any of that, she was why I started watching Babestation in the first place. It was Xtreme that I didn't like and didn't want and not Lolly. It was the fact that she was part of it that coloured my thoughts more than it ever should have.
I love Babestation now, and the part that she and the other girls play in it. Even Xtreme ads don't bother me now as I can focus more on what I do like and do want. I've left better forums than this due to excess negativity and the shitstorms it can create and want to avoid it wherever possible.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - StanTheMan - 06-07-2010 19:30
(06-07-2010 14:40 )babestation Wrote: guys I think you're blowing swearing on the mic out of proportion a little bit
is it really necessary for the girls to swear on mic? what would it add to your viewing enjoyment?
This is a typical misunderstanding when it comes to censorship issues. It's nothing to do with wanting to hear the girls swear, it's about somebody else taking it upon themselves to decide we're not allowed.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 06-07-2010 21:56
(06-07-2010 14:40 )babestation Wrote: is it really necessary for the girls to swear on mic? what would it add to your viewing enjoyment?
You're missing the point completely. As StanTheMan says, it's not that we particularly want the girls to swear (I actually thought they overdid it a bit when first allowed to say words like 'filthy') - it's the stupidity of not allowing them to that's so ridiculous. Why should a girl have to apologise for saying 'fuck' on a SEX CHAT show? Swearing isn't forbidden on mainstream tv, why should it be on Babestation?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - vila - 06-07-2010 23:10
(04-07-2010 12:53 )Josh Wrote: Naked Rochelle - Sky Exclusive (OSG) - 2nd July
(05-07-2010 01:36 )vila Wrote: I'll spare everyone from another of my Freeview discrimination rants.
I've changed my mind - I've only just noticed the 'Exclusively Sky!' caption.
Final categorical proof that anti-Freeview discrimination still exists and is absolutely deliberate. That caption is BS's ultimate two-finger salute to all Freeviewers.
That's fucking disgraceful.
Edited for typo.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Dan Volatile - 07-07-2010 00:09
(06-07-2010 14:40 )babestation Wrote: guys I think you're blowing swearing on the mic out of proportion a little bit
is it really necessary for the girls to swear on mic? what would it add to your viewing enjoyment?
If it was that trivial an issue you would not have gone to the trouble of banning it.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rogerbee - 08-07-2010 15:25
Right, stand by your beds and pay attention!
We all love our Babestation girls, right!? Well, we need to help them out. The following Facebook accounts are FAKE!!!:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001231278227
This claims to be Stevie, it is NOT!!
This is what the real Stevie told me herself:
"This isnt me i only have this profile and my fanpage my laptops been broocken so have had no internt. Can u let ppl no for me roger! Thnx for lettin me know xx"
The profile below is NOT Lolly Badcock:
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001185275861&ref=search
Lolly said this was fake herself on the 16th of June. The real Lolly posts as Laura Smith.
If any of you have added yourselves to these profiles, delete yourselves NOW and report the pages before you leave. I reported them both 3 days ago and they are STILL up!! If you see that any of your friends, BS girls included (they have been adding themselves), are mutual friends of either of these two, please warn them and tell them to do just as I have.
It is very likely that the people behind these fakes may well clone profiles of girls that add themselves in order to create more fake profiles. I love talking to the real girls on Facebook, so, let's all be vigilant and make sure we're talking to who we think we are.
At ease gentlemen!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - babestation - 08-07-2010 16:05
could u give us the links to the real girl's profiles and we'll report them
CHEERS!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rogerbee - 08-07-2010 17:18
Oh, you mean Laura Smith and Stevie-louise Ritchie!?
Sure!
Laura Smith (Lolly)
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000479886153
Real Stevie:
http://www.facebook.com/find-friends/?ref=sb#!/profile.php?id=100000141034339&ref=search
There you go! Be nice if we can kill off the fakers before the real ones get back. Oh, if anyone seaches for any others, check the friend lists, if I'm on there (Roger Bowen) then that girl is real. Elise has several profiles, but, I can guarantee that they are all her.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 08-07-2010 18:22
Weve been reporting both these profiles for weeks now seems facebook are sitting on there hands where as they will kick amber and cherri off at a moments notice
|