+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - hatessexistofcon - 02-02-2016 00:10
(01-01-2016 18:32 )rpj316 Wrote:Did you see a clitoris and labia minora clearly like they show male genitals or just in reality nothing shown at all?(31-12-2015 15:25 )Rigobert16 Wrote: I tuned into Sexcetera for the first time in over a year last night and with what I saw maybe things are changing, unless it was a one off.
There was an Hip Hop segment on the show and they showed the lot. Close up of arse and vagina from behind, plenty of uncensored vagina and then an overhead shot of two women pressing their arses together with a 4 second Vagina and anus shot.
It was very explicit.
How they get away with it and the babeshows cop for it,I just don't know.
They show penises testicles and retracted foreskins erections but what a women was born with is pixellated out. Many numerous letters tweets to ofcom and channel 4 give no answers What happened in kazoos and sunny beach is prick teasing. they show a women taking her knickers off (no nudity) as she was going out on town but when her skirt was yanked up twice all blurred out prick teasers. Sunny beach started with prolonged close up shots of male genitals but proceeded to blur out all female genitals
So angry all time why does this happen? Nowt to do with "now" this has gone on since 1996 for me. All penises in full glory tiny bit of fanny flaps blurred out with no VALID excuse because they have not got one. Females still second class citizens the genitals they are born with is the most taboo thing on tv/dvd.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - hatessexistofcon - 02-02-2016 02:45
Just watched sexetera now pick tv blurred out female genitals close up prolonged penis testicle shots. Pissed off complaint to ofcom fucking prick teasing cunts...
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - ShandyHand - 28-02-2016 15:05
Let's see if Ofcom find that a skimpy mesh outfit is okay for early evening family show shall we:
http://reveal.co.uk/showbiz-celeb-gossip/news/a683317/ofcom-receive-complaints-after-scantily-clad-sadie-pinn-gatecrashes-ant-and-dec-at-the-brits.html
May be an interesting comparative to the recent 'holey dress' speculation on the day shows.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - gunnar - 28-02-2016 18:03
^According to that article Ofcom only received 50 complaints. I wonder if any of them were Ofcom members of staff trying to drum up things to act upon, so they can justify their own existence.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 14-06-2016 21:30
SKY 140 is now showing Cookie Jane and Emily B and showcasing about their escorting work.
High Class Call Girls is the title LOLOLOL
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - munch1917 - 15-06-2016 18:08
^^ Already covered elsewhere when it was first broadcast on channel 4 (Emily's Chatgirl thread).
I'm sure it was repeated late one night on 4 just last week as well.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - DB83 - 15-06-2016 22:51
Seems I've missed somat having concentrated on that other in/out biz
BTW Would a 'High-class' call-girl in London been seen in Clapham ? (think about it
)[With apologies to the good people of Clapham]
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - joesco13 - 27-07-2016 13:51
Can anyone reconcile how Channel 4 can broadcast "Naked Attraction" at 10pm (Monday) with full and detailed frontal nudity (male and female) including, when the first female contestant picked her male partner for a date, said male with a clear semi with the restrictions placed on dedicated babe channels grouped far away from mainstream channels on the tv guide ?
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Tractor boy - 27-07-2016 14:01
(27-07-2016 13:51 )joesco13 Wrote: Can anyone reconcile how Channel 4 can broadcast "Naked Attraction" at 10pm (Monday) with full and detailed frontal nudity (male and female) including, when the first female contestant picked her male partner for a date, said male with a clear semi with the restrictions placed on dedicated babe channels grouped far away from mainstream channels on the tv guide ?
That's because the babe channels are classed as adverts, so they are far more heavily regulated.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - SteveHG - 01-08-2016 14:01
(27-07-2016 14:01 )Tractor boy Wrote:(27-07-2016 13:51 )joesco13 Wrote: Can anyone reconcile how Channel 4 can broadcast "Naked Attraction" at 10pm (Monday) with full and detailed frontal nudity (male and female) including, when the first female contestant picked her male partner for a date, said male with a clear semi with the restrictions placed on dedicated babe channels grouped far away from mainstream channels on the tv guide ?
That's because the babe channels are classed as adverts, so they are far more heavily regulated.
So can't they just get themselves re-classified as harmless evening entertainment or some other category that isn't as heavily regulated, or is that too simple?! Who decides they're advertising - Ofcom? Advertising for what? Selling pics and vids?