+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - derekdas - 01-08-2016 19:43
(01-08-2016 14:01 )SteveHG Wrote:It's more to do with the phone ins.(27-07-2016 14:01 )Tractor boy Wrote:(27-07-2016 13:51 )joesco13 Wrote: Can anyone reconcile how Channel 4 can broadcast "Naked Attraction" at 10pm (Monday) with full and detailed frontal nudity (male and female) including, when the first female contestant picked her male partner for a date, said male with a clear semi with the restrictions placed on dedicated babe channels grouped far away from mainstream channels on the tv guide ?
That's because the babe channels are classed as adverts, so they are far more heavily regulated.
So can't they just get themselves re-classified as harmless evening entertainment or some other category that isn't as heavily regulated, or is that too simple?! Who decides they're advertising - Ofcom? Advertising for what? Selling pics and vids?
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - circles_o_o_o - 02-09-2016 10:51
Quote:'MY EYES JUST DIED' Viewers disgusted as Channel 5 shows drug dealers pushing condoms filled with drugs up their bum
https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/1713546/viewers-disgusted-as-channel-5-shows-drug-dealers-pushing-condoms-filled-with-drugs-up-their-bum/
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - munch1917 - 12-09-2016 04:32
Completely forget what it was for, but I saw an ad last night (must have been on an ITV channel) featuring a girl clearly naked in a shower, singing badly. She then leans out the shower to reach for her phone as she gets a message from friends inviting her out for karaoke later. She is covered only by the shower curtain.
I was somewhat surprised that it had managed to get past the regulators with such gratuitous nudity.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - DB83 - 12-09-2016 15:51
^^ I saw that ad on ch4 during the Paralympic broadcast(s).
Never believe what you see since I suspect the girl was quite decently covered.
Better be careful else a certain poster will come along and state that the nudity does not count since she was covered by the curtain
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - hatessexistofcon - 12-09-2016 17:01
(12-09-2016 15:51 )DB83 Wrote: ^^ I saw that ad on ch4 during the Paralympic broadcast(s).
Never believe what you see since I suspect the girl was quite decently covered.
Better be careful else a certain poster will come along and state that the nudity does not count since she was covered by the curtain
Haha that will be me.
It is genital nudity that gets my back up.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - DB83 - 12-09-2016 17:45
^^ Oh. No. Not you (this time
)
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - munch1917 - 12-09-2016 18:13
(12-09-2016 15:51 )DB83 Wrote: Never believe what you see since I suspect the girl was quite decently covered.
One pair of panties or two
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - DB83 - 12-09-2016 18:23
Another night in front of ch4. Let's see if it's on again.
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Block - 12-09-2016 18:41
I am guessing this is the advert in question?
RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - cwpussylover - 12-09-2016 18:49
couldnt see a nipple in the ad...let alone any pussy??
