The UK Babe Channels Forum
Studio66 & OnlyFans - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV (formerly Elite TV) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=255)
+----- Forum: STUDIO 66 TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=66)
+----- Thread: Studio66 & OnlyFans (/showthread.php?tid=74869)



RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - HEX!T - 12-10-2018 13:55

(12-10-2018 13:40 )jammie82uk Wrote:  
(12-10-2018 12:52 )HEX!T Wrote:  [Image: 5d0174999585284.jpg]
the girls earn as little as 10% or as much as 75% depending on how many fans they have and how many resub.

I think you might be interpreting that chart wrong as I have no clue where you are getting that idea from

Onlyfans charge a set rate of 20% commission

it says it there on the chart mate. nothing missunderstood.
it clearly says the girls will ear between 149 and 750 per 1000 fans. who sub at 14.99

so if the girl is getting 149 per 1000 subs shes getting 10% @14.99
and yeah iz a dumdum... on the high estimate its more like 50%. so i duno mate. 20% may be the minimum they take with the max being set by the girls popularity... the less popular the more they take ???


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - cwpussylover - 12-10-2018 14:16

that chart is a load of overestimated bs....might as well quote the national lottery....


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - jammie82uk - 12-10-2018 14:27

(12-10-2018 13:55 )HEX!T Wrote:  it says it there on the chart mate. nothing missunderstood.
it clearly says the girls will ear between 149 and 750 per 1000 fans. who sub at 14.99

so if the girl is getting 149 per 1000 subs shes getting 10% @14.99
and yeah iz a dumdum... on the high estimate its more like 50%. so i duno mate. 20% may be the minimum they take with the max being set by the girls popularity... the less popular the more they take ???

You are definitely interpreting it wrong

That chart is only an suggestion guide on how much a girl might earn

It’s saying if a girl has 1000 followers on social media and charges 14.99

If 1% of her 1000 followers on social media subscribe she will earn 149
If 5% of her 1000 followers on social media subscribe she will earn 749

And just for avoidance of doubt here is the T’s and C’s regarding it posted here

https://onlyfans.com/terms/

4.2 If a User uploads content (an "Uploading User") then, subject to that User complying with these Terms, that User is entitled to 80% of the revenue generated by other Users who subscribe to the uploading User's content. Payment will be made by or on behalf of OnlyFans to the uploading User.


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - HEX!T - 12-10-2018 14:36

ah ok mate cheers...
thought it seemed a bit steep for there to take 90%


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - cwpussylover - 12-10-2018 14:42

(12-10-2018 14:36 )HEX!T Wrote:  ah ok mate cheers...
thought it seemed a bit steep for there to take 90%

you only earn IF!! I say again IF any of those "1000" twitter follwers join up....you can have 50,000 twitter followers and if none join up...you earn FA....onlyfans are ASSuME ing that a certain % will join, in the real world you can reduce that chart drastically...as I said it is hyped up BS to get the girls knickers wet....misleading figures...maybe 0.01% of the girls hit the gigures assumed


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - hairbald - 12-10-2018 15:41

(12-10-2018 14:42 )cwpussylover Wrote:  you only earn IF!! I say again IF any of those "1000" twitter follwers join up....you can have 50,000 twitter followers and if none join up...you earn FA....onlyfans are ASSuME ing that a certain % will join, in the real world you can reduce that chart drastically...as I said it is hyped up BS to get the girls knickers wet....misleading figures...maybe 0.01% of the girls hit the gigures assumed

Its a big if. Alexa Brooke is currently bemused why she has 40000 followers on Instagram but only a couple of hundred have liked her recent photo. And a like doesn't cost anything.

Every failed business case in history starts with the phrase "If x% of the available market buys my product......" Big Grin


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - tony confederate - 12-10-2018 15:42

(12-10-2018 12:15 )Charlemagne Wrote:  They may have a case for contructive dismissal,

A self-employed person can't be dismissed, whether constructively or otherwise.

In order to be dismissed you need to be employed in the first place.


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - HEX!T - 12-10-2018 15:56

thats pretty much how it is. if there self employed and dont agree to the terms of the contract your basically giving up the placement.
the company isnt firing you because its your decision to sign.

which is how lucy has pretty much framed it.. new contract, didnt like it so refused to sign. and moved on.


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - jammie82uk - 12-10-2018 16:06

(12-10-2018 14:42 )cwpussylover Wrote:  
(12-10-2018 14:36 )HEX!T Wrote:  ah ok mate cheers...
thought it seemed a bit steep for there to take 90%

you only earn IF!! I say again IF any of those "1000" twitter follwers join up....you can have 50,000 twitter followers and if none join up...you earn FA....onlyfans are ASSuME ing that a certain % will join, in the real world you can reduce that chart drastically...as I said it is hyped up BS to get the girls knickers wet....misleading figures...maybe 0.01% of the girls hit the gigures assumed

How is it hyped up bullshit and misleading figures

The figures are correct if 1% of 1000 join at 14.99 you earn 149

It’s clear You obviously don’t know a lot about the website
The girls are making money on it or why would they do it
There are accounts making a couple of grand a day after commission and they are just everyday girls who have never modeled before

Girls like Lucy-Anne obviously have an advantage by having a fan base already and the referral scheme has helped her as she also gets 5% of whatever the person she referred earns and with referring most of the s66 girls she was into a good thing


RE: Studio66 & OnlyFans - Foggy Mainwaring - 12-10-2018 16:31

(12-10-2018 08:28 )ClassicRock Wrote:  This sort of behaviour leads to desperate measures, ala Frank Sinatra and his old bandleader Tommy Dorsey:

https://www.complex.com/music/2011/11/a-history-of-frank-sinatras-most-gangsta-moments/3

Dorsey demanded that the young singer pay him one-third of his earnings for life and an additional 10 percent to his agent. According to journalist Anthony Bruno, “By the terms of the contract, 43% of Frank Sinatra would belong to Tommy Dorsey and his agent forever.”

In his article “Frank Sinatra and the Mob,” Bruno writes, “In 1943, Sinatra's representatives tried to get him out of the contract, offering Dorsey $60,000 to rip it up. Dorsey, who had a reputation for being tough, refused."

Bruno continued, writing, "By some accounts, hard negotiation eventually convinced the bandleader to take the offer, but other accounts say that Sinatra's godfather, Willie Moretti, convinced Dorsey to see the light…Moretti bragged in private that he and a few associates paid an unannounced visit to Dorsey in Los Angeles. Moretti allegedly jammed the barrel of a gun into the trombonist's mouth and got him to release Sinatra from his obligations in exchange for one dollar."

On that basis, my men are going to march on S66 studios with fixed bayonets and stick it right up 'em.
I'm with you chaps that want a takeover of S66, please can I bags Sophia Lares.