+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115)
+---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Digital Dave - 09-05-2012 08:34
(09-05-2012 00:18 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote:(08-05-2012 23:19 )Rammyrascal Wrote: has to be something wrong behind the scenes to explain storm/paradiso's inability to keep hold of babes
No, nothing wrong behind the scenes, so please don't bother with the conspiracy theories. Storm is just not in a position to pay girls as much as other channels, that's all.
And how do you know? Your comment is completely unfounded.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - half man half horse - 09-05-2012 09:22
It is obvious that this channel isn't in a position to pay what other channels pay and will always lose girls to other channels for that reason. Still they have done well at times and had a lot of good girls on there, despite being a small channel.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 09-05-2012 09:39
It's the way that they lose their girls which is surprising.
Like Roxy Belle.
Returns from her holiday, gets her news shifts (which were published on here) and then someone else is brought in at the last minute.
And then she annouces that she's going to work from home on Adultworks.
It's not the first time this has happened at Storm.
The show is becoming the Bermuda triangle of the babeshows.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - prince henry sinclair - 09-05-2012 18:21
(09-05-2012 08:34 )Digital Dave Wrote:(09-05-2012 00:18 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: No, nothing wrong behind the scenes, so please don't bother with the conspiracy theories. Storm is just not in a position to pay girls as much as other channels, that's all.
And how do you know? Your comment is completely unfounded.
I've spoken to a couple of girls on other channels who used to work for Storm and they both told me they were quite happy at Storm but moved because they received a better offer. So my comment is not unfounded.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - shankey! - 09-05-2012 18:28
(09-05-2012 18:21 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: I've spoken to a couple of girls on other channels who used to work for Storm and they both told me they were quite happy at Storm but moved because they received a better offer. So my comment is not unfounded.if pay was the reason could walk into any other channel and fit in probably as one of their top girls , which is what she would do in my opinion if they were not to pay her the top rate as any other channel
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - robert.f4 - 09-05-2012 18:32
Yeh strange times indeed,but Storms not the only channel to lose babes these day,for the past wee while most if not all the channels have been re-shuffled to fit around some babes relocating and some new arrivals,a bit unnerving to say the least
"Calm down dear" 
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - prince henry sinclair - 09-05-2012 18:33
(09-05-2012 18:28 )shankey! Wrote: could walk into any other channel
You're entitled to your opinion.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 09-05-2012 20:02
(09-05-2012 18:21 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: I've spoken to a couple of girls on other channels who used to work for Storm and they both told me they were quite happy at Storm but moved because they received a better offer. So my comment is not unfounded.
So in effect you dismissed my comment as a "Conspiracy theory" when your own "insight" is no more or less credible than my own?
We both spoke to girls who are at the channel/previously worked at the channel so why does your source deserve any more credibility than mine?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - beardedbob - 09-05-2012 21:00
coz he is a prince, and you good sir, are a villain!
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 10-05-2012 22:33
(09-05-2012 18:32 )robert.f4 Wrote: Storms not the only channel to lose babes these day,for the past wee while most if not all the channels have been re-shuffled to fit around some babes relocating and some new arrivals
Yes that's very true, Storm isn't alone. ALL the channels seem to have shuffled their lineups recently as they all seem to lose girls one way or another. Look how many have left Babestation this year.
Storm generally manage to get very good girls, despite being small compared to other channels, so let's hope they manage to continue to do so. We need Storm to prosper to provide us with more choice in the marketplace.