Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity

Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity (/showthread.php?tid=28022)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - shankey! - 22-06-2017 09:16

(22-06-2017 06:25 )babelover48 Wrote: I'd like to know how the f**K OFCOM sets these standards and allows mainstream TV to get away with as much nudity as it can yet won't allow the same level on the babe shows!! It still does my f***g head in that they clamp down on a supposedly 'adult' channel service, yet f*****g mainstream can have free rein to allow nudity as 'art'

As far as I'm concerned in 2017 it is time OFCOM just disappeared up it's own arse & the Government said "All adult service channels can do what they like"

the babe channels wouldnt show much more than they do already without charging an arm and a leg for it first,but i do agree with you totally ,amanda holdens tit falling out on bgt was soon edited out ,if its male nudity it gets ignored Huh

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - lovebabes56 - 22-06-2017 11:08

I think the channel service now is costing an arm and a leg as it is lol

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - circles_o_o_o - 09-08-2017 11:46

Bare boobs showing on a screen in the background of the 10 o'clock news last night

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - terence - 09-08-2017 11:50

^ok, it's competition time again. name those tits!

my guess is tove lo. she seems to have her tit's out all the time so why not? Wink

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - derekdas - 09-08-2017 22:31

See in yesterdays Sun that Ofcom ruled that the Naked Attraction on tv did not contravene their rules, as the show used the explicit close ups of genitalia in the right context. It also said that the program put out a warning before the start of the show. Still doesn't stop some old granny, that might be offended, just surfing through the channels and coming across it after the show had started.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - mrmann - 11-08-2017 00:21

^ LOL The right context LOLOLOLOLOL

Any excuse OfCON can come up with.

Obviously the main interest to people viewing Naked Attraction is TITILATION. People watch this show to see vaginas and penises and breasts and ass, no other reason.

OfCON probably gives it a pass because they love all the penis shots.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - Rigobert16 - 02-05-2018 20:39

Few caps from the last few months. Most Sexcetera including a semi erect penis. Some from the freeview channel.

Semi erect penis on Sexcetera and the aftermath of Blowjob with semen on face with fully erect penis. Uncensored handjob and a fully erect penis behind the graphic.

A couple of uncensored photos showing vagina and spread vagina with butthole, Vibrator play and Vagina licking.

A few others including close up penis, vagina, butthole, ass.

Some from the freeview channel.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - hatessexistofcon - 25-05-2018 22:18

So another film on way with strong nudity cert 15 called "Studio 54" bet its another erection,fucking hell sick of this.15 is schoolchild age. Then the Ladybird film contains 3 pictures of erections cert 15 and The Happy Prince film has strong nudity which looks to be erections in cert 15 film. erection is R18 stuff and schoolgirls get to see it what about schoolboys seeing a wet vulva in cert 15 films. so angry.

The channel 5 shows "The Sex Business" with men wanking to erection and ejaculation with prolonged erection close ups and one with foreskin retracted and bleeding. All vulva shots were half blurred out so where is equality. Why did the research team not show women wanking and getting wet. fucking pissed off the vulva is the most taboo thing on planet earth. Ofcom complaints gone in and writing to mp about bbfc they are so wrong, badly seriously wrong.

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - bigbobsbeans - 27-05-2018 23:58

(02-05-2018 20:39 )Rigobert16 Wrote: Few caps from the last few months. Most Sexcetera including a semi erect penis. Some from the freeview channel.

well sexectra back in the day used to be on playboy tv which was pretty much uncut because it was a documentary type show, bravo back in the day used to show stuff like that under sin cities

RE: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity - bb77 - 19-07-2018 22:11

There was a show on fivestar a couple of nights ago called Sex Working from Home or something similar.

About 3 prostitutes in the UK, one a dom, one a regular girl and one a gay male. In the first 5 minutes they had cocks being kicked, squashed and another guy literally jerking off over a girls ass.

Not that I didn't enjoy it, but how the hell is that allowed and babeshows are in trouble if a flash of vag slips out the side?

I truly don't get what OfCom actually does. Even the pay per view channels can't show this much