+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115)
+---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Jamie Storm - 11-05-2012 00:46
(09-05-2012 20:02 )Gaz "AV1" Aston Wrote:(09-05-2012 18:21 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: I've spoken to a couple of girls on other channels who used to work for Storm and they both told me they were quite happy at Storm but moved because they received a better offer. So my comment is not unfounded.
So in effect you dismissed my comment as a "Conspiracy theory" when your own "insight" is no more or less credible than my own?
We both spoke to girls who are at the channel/previously worked at the channel so why does your source deserve any more credibility than mine?
I wont be getting drawn into debates on this forum because it's a pointless exercise, but I want to put an end to this nonsense once and for all !
I wouldn't even dismiss your comment has a "Conspiracy theory" I would dismiss your comment has totally unfounded.
believe what you will, but let me tell you now we have one of the best reputations in this business for paying girls. there isn't one girl that has ever worked here that hasn't been paid, if this wasn't a fact there would be a million posts from girls complaining, is there? no.
I don't care for your "source" either ! no need to protect her identity behind your shield of shining Armour, thats a very easy get out, for all anybody knows it could be you making up anything you like. If she can't even be bothered to post her complaint on here herself then i guess there wasn't really that much of a problem in the first place. Let her speak up now or forever hold her peace.
Please back up your comments with proof, or to me its just unfounded hearsay, and I have no time for that or your posts in our thread i will ask them to be removed by admin.
Bear this in mind, in all the years I've worked on the Channels I've yet to meet a girl thats been Fired ! and i doubt I ever will.
There will always be a story a problem with shifts, the Channel it goes on, at the end of the day what are they going to say, I got fired because my minutes were low, I was unreliable etc etc.
I can count on one hand the girls that have left Storm of their own accord in over two years.
We fire a girl because she is unreliable = theres a problem with Storm.
We fire a girls because she doesn't make minutes = theres a problem with storm.
We fire a girl because her demands become unreasonable = theres a problem with Storm
A girl leaves "on good terms" because shes had a better offer = theres a problem with Storm
A girl is forced to leave for personal reasons which are out of our control = theres a problem with Storm.
We trial girls but they don't get the job = Storm is the Bermuda triangle
I guess this would be the same for other channels which have 10x our turnover of girls right? or is it that Storm is just an easier target.
Take from this what you want, like I said I wont be getting drawn into a debate.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 11-05-2012 09:40
^^^ If you read my original post again you will see i stopped short of presenting it as FACT, i was just posting what i had heard, my exchange with Prince Henry Sinclair was more about him dismissing my sources comments over his own sources comments when in fact neither had any more credibility than the other as we are both industry outsiders.
Seeing as you brought it up there is a problem with Storm, in fact there is more than just one from your shit webstream to your static shows and performers (1 or 2 aside) , your rubbish sets, piss poor lighting to the fact the mic hasnt worked properly for the best part of 18 months...I could go on.
Are you an easy target? Yes...but putting out the product you are currently are is hardly helping that is it?
Make of that what you will...there is no debate
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - William H Bonney - 11-05-2012 12:38
(11-05-2012 00:46 )Jamie Storm Wrote: is it that Storm is just an easier target.
It must be that Storm is regarded as an easier target, simply because as others have said above all the channels have been seeing girls depart in the last few months. I agree with what Barrie said - how many girls have left Babestation this year?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Roxanna - 15-05-2012 00:21
Hi guys, I don't post on here very often, but now with all the negativity aimed towards our channel I cannot keep quiet anymore. As a veteran of the babechannels (and with nearly 7 years of experience on different channels I guess I can qualify) I can honestly say that there is absolutely nothing wrong with our channel!!! With 2 years of no investment whatsoever I am amazed the guys have kept the channel running through thick and thin. Think about it, its only due to good management skills and good treatment of us girls the channel has managed to stay alive for over two years and now things are improving and looking up for us. We are well looked after, we ALWAYS get paid, yes, couple of girls got fined, and very rightly so! Its a policy that every channel enforces to keep staff disiplined, but again it only happened to a very few girls with us which is far more lax than any other channel I've worked on. For example I can name you one channel that fines you £50 for being 5 minutes late!
Girls come and go, even more so on the other channels, but it doesn't mean there is a problem...it's just the nature of the business we are all in and thats the FACT you need to understand. I feel quite upset that Storm have to explain and defend every business move or incident such as departure that happens within Storm.
Some girls have stayed with Storm for years including me rather than doing the usual channel hopping thing because believe it or not this is a great place to work, we have stability and security in our job, there is a good and friendly working environment and unlike some other channels there is no pressure for us to do things we are unhappy to do, which you should all be happy about knowing. And believe me, after working long and hard to get a name for myself in the international glamour and adult industry I wouldn't put it to some dodgy channel as some of you trying to portray Storm as.
So this is what I have to say about current situation, any constructive comments are welcome, but please no petty shit about the mic not working properly etc. It took them a year to get a new mic and someone has broke it within a month! So yes, we are back to the old one...deal with that! Its not as if any of you call us anyway
Why not just concentrate on a show we are all trying to produce under the strict Ofcom regulations and current financial climate. So many things are changing for the better here at Storm right now and you will see it very soon, including the arrival of some new girlies. I want to thank the handful of you that stuck with us and continue to support Storm with all the "bad press" we are getting at the moment and let me assure you that this is not "the last nail in the coffin", but the start of something new and better!
Always yours,
Roxanna xxx
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Gaz "AV1" Aston - 15-05-2012 10:05
(15-05-2012 00:21 )Roxanna Wrote: So this is what I have to say about current situation, any constructive comments are welcome, but please no petty shit about the mic not working properly etc. It took them a year to get a new mic and someone has broke it within a month! So yes, we are back to the old one...deal with that! Its not as if any of you call us anyway
How are yopu supposed to entice callers over the mic if they cant hear you?
A mic from Argos would probably cost less than £50 which would do the job better than the one you've got!
Call it "petty" if you like, but its just one of numerous factors that is making Storm TV damn near unwatchable at the moment!
I was a fairly regular caller, in fact have spent more money calling Storm over the years when the likes of Louise, Ruby and Reede worked for the channel than any other channel combined, so i think i have a right to bemoan the channels on-air product as it is at the moment!
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Chilly - 15-05-2012 10:15
(15-05-2012 10:05 )Gaz "AV1" Aston Wrote: A mic from Argos would probably cost less than £50 which would do the job better than the one you've got!
Indeed it would cost less.
![[Image: capture_278.jpg]](http://imagechunk.com/images/capture_278.jpg)
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Digital Dave - 15-05-2012 11:55
(15-05-2012 00:21 )Roxanna Wrote: It took them a year to get a new mic
Roxanna xxx
Whilst it's commendable for Roxanna to take the time to come here and defend her employer, it doesn't detract from the fact that there are serious problems with the channel. The above statement about the mic says it all.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Carl-Gen X - 15-05-2012 13:47
It took them a year to get a new mic.
Jesus, they are in trouble!
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 15-05-2012 15:55
Am I the only person who doesn't care about a silly old mic?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 15-05-2012 16:20
(15-05-2012 15:55 )Doddle Wrote: Am I the only person who doesn't care about a silly old mic?
Yes..
For months I thought that my hearing was going along with the eyesight.
Thanks for the feedback Jamie and Roxanna
I'm glad that Jamie scotched the rumour that you were sending the girls off to the Bermuda Triangle (wonder who came up with that one
)Can I also kick into touch my latest conspiracy theory that Jamie has developed a big breast fetish (and I mean very big).
However I don't think that you can say that we don't ring your girls..
We don't always give our forum names, sometimes we use our real names.. (I'm Clint
)p.s. Any chance of you getting my fav babe back