+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Roquentin - 01-04-2012 00:30
Why thank you Ofcome! What a breath of fresh air, and it's that kind of cannot do attitude that should get us through this economic downturn, along with a little good old honest sexual fun while we are at it. Three cheers for austerity!
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 01-04-2012 00:32
(01-04-2012 00:12 )Ofcome Wrote: ANNOUNCEMENT
Under the Communications Act 2003, Ofcom has a duty to set and enforce standards for broadcast content as appear to it best calculated to secure the standards objectives. Ofcom recently announced a further like-for-like reduction in its annual budget. This is year two of a four-year programme to reduce significantly expenditure across the organisation while maintaining capability and effectiveness.
Reviews of viewer concerns and complaint volumes has highlighted that the adult sector is not an issue for most members of the UK population and does not warrant significant intervention. Ofcom proposes scaling back resources allocated to investigating the sector and only investigating if 5 or more independent viewer complaints are received within 7 days of a broadcast and the content is supposedly stronger than BBFC 18 or equivalent (unrated live content). A six month trial period starts today.
and a very happy april fools day to u too
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 01-04-2012 01:50
What gets me is Ofcom's use of the word harm and offense, if we were to stick to that statement across the whole range of channels we'd be left with nothing, being offended is something we all go through on a daily basis whether it be biased editorial content on the news/sport something out there is going to piss us off at some point. What I also don't get is you can't show the pussy but you can show the breasts on the babe channels, again a very flawed argument, if you don't like the babe channels and are easily offended by them the breasts, pussy or bikini outfit's are all going to offend you equally, infact just seeing this type of channel in the first place will offend you if you don't like it. Because of Ofcom's biased attitude towards the babe channels we are now left with this watered down shandy piss on a daily basis which on the subject of being offended, I am very offended that our viewing pleasure should be restricted all because of Ofcom's flawed arguments and in general very fucked up idea's
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 01-04-2012 20:19
Well what i don't understand is that Ofcom will allow:
No.1- To see boobs after 10pm
No.2- The babes are allowed to go nude after 11pm
No.3- Ofcom allow some 241 interaction however with minimal contact
Now if I've got this right all of the above Ofcom deem not to be Harmful or Offensive. So are Ofcom saying that if a Young child happens to stumble on this content that it won't cause any harm and offence?
Right OK
However a Babe laying on her back legs spread showing her pussy, or either touching herself either with the Handthong is deemed Harmful and offensive mmmh I'm confused
If I've got this right, it just goes to show why Ofcom needs to be either deregulated of dismantled altogether, there so called rules simply don't add up
RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 01-04-2012 20:27
(01-04-2012 20:19 )continental19 Wrote: Well what i don't understand is that Ofcom will allow:all a load of bollocks, they do what they want when they want,and always have , just waiting for the summer to come and another set of rules will be set out to be obeyed !
No.1- To see boobs after 10pm
No.2- The babes are allowed to go nude after 11pm
No.3- Ofcom allow some 241 interaction however with minimal contact
Now if I've got this right all of the above Ofcom deem not to be Harmful or Offensive. So are Ofcom saying that if a Young child happens to stumble on this content that it won't cause any harm and offence?
Right OK
However a Babe laying on her back legs spread showing her pussy, or either touching herself either with the Handthong is deemed Harmful and offensive mmmh I'm confused
If I've got this right, it just goes to show why Ofcom needs to be either deregulated of dismantled altogether, there so called rules simply don't add up
RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 01-04-2012 20:35
(01-04-2012 20:27 )shankey! Wrote: all a load of bollocks, they do what they want when they want,and always have , just waiting for the summer to come and another set of rules will be set out to be obeyed !
Good point Shankey
RE: Ofcom Discussion - arron88 - 01-04-2012 20:48
(01-04-2012 20:27 )shankey! Wrote: all a load of bollocks, they do what they want when they want,and always have , just waiting for the summer to come and another set of rules will be set out to be obeyed !Yes if you look at their annual plan on page 19 it says they are consulting again. Maybe they won't survive this time.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 01-04-2012 20:52
If any new Ofcom rules come out for the babe channels which are worse that the ones that currently exist I also think it'll be bye bye to the channels and certain bankruptcy. I don't hold out much hope that the rules will in any way be relaxed more taking into consideration of the recent storm they kicked off about with regard to the content on Babestation and as we know the channel execs are all too happy to agree with anything Ofcom come up with as they lack balls to tell them to go and jump.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 01-04-2012 20:56
Ofcom is against the freedom of the people to watch what they want.
Is it not bit irresponsible that Ofcom is doing everything it can to destroy these channels, because people need these jobs to pay bills. Some babes probably do modelling shoots and porn, but I say there are some babes that rely on these channels for income. Its really annoying these corrupt Ofcom bastards ruining entertainment for people
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 01-04-2012 23:12
Effectively what Ofcom are saying these days is masterbation is wrong and is a sin which must be stamped out, they say no problem we'll let you air your show, just so long as it's not erotic and not to cause arousal in the slightest way, well excuse me for a minute but isn't that the very point of them in the first place, they are supposed to be wank channels, were set up to be wank channels so how else can you market a late night sex channel if it can't be sexy. They hide behind this supposed blanket that kids are still up and would tune into the shows, so what if they did, where's the evidence to support the claim that they'd actually cause any harm anyhow, infact I make no bones about it but I had my first wank when I was about 12 and would have been more that delighted if I had something like Babestation going on back then instead of some used porn mag I found in my older brothers bedroom, what I ask is going through puberty is perfectly natural so why does Ofcom seem to have such a problem with these sort of channels in the first place, so what if a minor accidently stumbles across them, it's better that than some extremely fucked up porn on the internet that would possibly cause them some harm than the sight of a mere naked women.