RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 03-07-2014 22:07
(03-07-2014 20:14 )davetherave57 Wrote: After All The Big Build Up...... Promos All Night On BS1.....Guessing Games On Here........And........... A.........No Show :-(
it's not all bad look who's on instead of caty tonight
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - The Silent Majority - 03-07-2014 22:11
(03-07-2014 21:00 )DJ NES Wrote: HAHA! I have no clue what's gone on. Quite a shock in all honesty, my source is offline on skype so who know's what's going on?
He's in an interrogation room with a light shining in his face.
If he doesn't crack, you're safe
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 03-07-2014 22:13
I suppose the problem is once speculation starts and pre appearance announcements are made the potential for a bidding war emerges. Best to keep all transfer activity under wraps .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Danzig - 03-07-2014 22:36
BS bosses usually make good choices of babes down the years and Caty Cole and Alice Goodwin aren't a good idea for this channel.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Digital Dave - 03-07-2014 22:46
(03-07-2014 22:13 )snookered147 Wrote: I suppose the problem is once speculation starts and pre appearance announcements are made the potential for a bidding war emerges. Best to keep all transfer activity under wraps .
Indeed. I suspect S66 have simply increased their hourly rate to retain them, making BS look like fools. There are no contracts in this game, which is why a babe can tell a channel to their face that they've accepted an offer, only to renege when their current channel offers them more.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lacey_fan - 03-07-2014 23:06
I understand schedules are subject to change. But after all their twitter announcements and videos along with the special sections in the BS Blog (cough....cough Lucy and Yasmine saga) surely BS should have learnt their lesson. We could be wrong here and it could be a simple schedule. I say bring back Lacey Lorenzo ASAP BS dont need to steal babes from other channels they already have a wide range of babes which cater to everyone.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 04-07-2014 00:18
It feels exactly the same as the failed Yasmine and Lucy double signing,lets just hope they dont repeat what they did then and state what a great debut they had given us when it never actually happened,but i suppose with BS anything is possible,on the subject of whether BS needs Caty or Alice,personally i dont think they would bring anything new to the channel,Caty's recent shows have not exactly set the world on fire and Alice seems to not be fussed about appearing and does not always turn up.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Digital Dave - 04-07-2014 00:34
Schedules are always subject to change and models are notoriously unreliable, but if you have signed a headline act and promoted it all over the place, for the model not to appear is ludicrous.
This isn't a scheduling error, that wouldn't happen with such a high stakes signing. Either the babe in question couldn't be arsed to turn up, in which case she should be sacked immediately, or she decided to stay with her current employer after he plied her with more cash.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 04-07-2014 01:01
Why so much comment? We've been here before haven't we? Danica's first appearance on Babestation was highly promoted but didn't materialise.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Danzig - 04-07-2014 02:32
(04-07-2014 01:01 )admiral decker Wrote: Why so much comment? We've been here before haven't we? Danica's first appearance on Babestation was highly promoted but didn't materialise.
It's because of that S66 got their own back by saying they were gonna sign Lolly Badcock I seem to remember.
|