Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 01-04-2012 23:23 Right now on a channel calling itself 'E! Entertainment' there's a show called 15 Most Shocking Acts of Violence. Can ANYONE here explain to me why, if Ofcom are so concerned about growing kids and 'harmful' content, they continue to ignore these kinds of programmes?? This is the real filth on our television screens these days, but Ofcom like the perverted fucking cunts they are seem to think it's perfectly fine and acceptable to allow kids to veg on endless images of fictional and real violence RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 01-04-2012 23:46 Stan the reason that programme is ok is because it doesn't cause any sexual arousal, that's the crux of the matter, allways has been and allways will. It's clear to see that Ofcom haven't done their job right from day 1, just look at the total lack of erotic material on SKY TV, nothing, just comedy, sport and violence. Going back to an earler point I made I am even questioning the need for the Adult Channels to be age restricted in the first place because sex is a totally natural thing from growing up during adolescence right through to the rest of our lives. Watching Adult channels has been proven beyond all doubt that it causes no any real harm in the rest of Europe except this country. Ofcom doesn't like erotic channels and will continue to rid this country of them one by one until we've got nothing left. RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 02-04-2012 00:22 Reminds me of when sex shop licencing and R18 first came out. Even with freeze frame it wasnt possible to see anything explicit. Sex shops were permitted to have a high concentration of sex themed content, but not actually allowed anything explicit. These days we have sex channels without sex. RE: Ofcom Discussion - arron88 - 02-04-2012 00:43 RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 02-04-2012 06:44 ofcom seem to think that violence is ok sex is not, from games on x box to violence in coronation street, you can punch someones lights out and show it (you tube included without age verification) ,pepper your opponent with an oozie in a video game , but full rontal nudity ? heaven forbid, it kind of has a mirror image on the saying and perhaps it should be changed "to make war not love " no wonder the whole world is fucked up , seems every leader wants a conflict but not :a wank ! RE: Ofcom Discussion - IvIaxed Stats 76 - 02-04-2012 10:11 thanks ofcom you`ve completely won the day,all the shows are boring tedious and just how you want them RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 02-04-2012 21:57 The importance of protecting society (with thanks to The Metro 2/4/2012) RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 15-04-2012 13:21 (15-04-2012 13:19 )fedup Wrote: What ofc@unts are saying is its wrong to show female genatalia on UK tv,,that is all i get back from emails..They say a females genital lips are illegal to be shown unless medicall..So Daddy Daycare can show toddlers and babys male genatalia and close up too but no female genatalia.Thats is my biggest fucked off rant ..So in the beginning they could have said no close ups of penises are allowed and close ups or shots of penises with the foreskin pulled back are not allowed as its extremly explicit..But no in the beginning some twathead said its illegal to show fanny lips never mind even the showing of OPENING the fanny lips to see the vaginal hole or urethra..It discriminates genatalia saying all women should be disgraced at what they have between their legs and get it removed..So pised with these ofc@nts and have found this to read which rants about intodays WE ARE IN IT TOGETHER how come oftwats have BIG wages.. Sorry heres that link to this thing i read,,i skimmed read it but get the idea.Start about 2nd paragraph down. http://collymore.blog.co.uk/2012/02/21/ofcunts-britain-s-unbiased-media-regulators-12866007/ RE: Ofcom Discussion - Addison - 15-04-2012 15:31 I don't know where you see all these penises, fedup. You must have to go searching for them, because I never come across them in the course of casual TV watching. But in any case your angle of argument seems off to me. No one's going to believe a ranter (who frequents a forum set up to focus on TV softcore porn!) is going to want to see female genitalia shots shown on TV purely in the interests of equality or out of some sense of outrage on behalf of women who are somehow being made to feel genitally ashamed. Also, your choice of mocking labels ("ofc@nts" "twathead(s)") seems telling, and ought to be more thoughtfully selected. Why never "dickface" or "knobhead"? RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 16-04-2012 02:45 (15-04-2012 15:31 )Addison Wrote: I don't know where you see all these penises, fedup. You must have to go searching for them, because I never come across them in the course of casual TV watching. But in any case your angle of argument seems off to me. No one's going to believe a ranter (who frequents a forum set up to focus on TV softcore porn!) is going to want to see female genitalia shots shown on TV purely in the interests of equality or out of some sense of outrage on behalf of women who are somehow being made to feel genitally ashamed. Also, your choice of mocking labels ("ofc@nts" "twathead(s)") seems telling, and ought to be more thoughtfully selected. Why never "dickface" or "knobhead"? I think you work for ofcom bloody well convinced cause every time your on here you defend them. Since i am fighting against ofcom and their ban on female genatalia i am hardly going to use male genatalia names..Right this year party paramedics,my daughter the teenage naturist,8hrs easter friday on Quest freeview 38 in daytime loads of penises,on and on penises shown ..I am pissed off with oftwats pixellating out,filming from behind or totalling cutting out of hundreds of programmes real life vaginas..My fights been over 25 years where in the same god damn shot the minute a womens slightly opens her legs its fucking banned yet same time penis is shown in full.This is leading to the babestation problems..Why can a women tune into UK tv and see penises but men never can unless medical?? We all know it goes on and and its fully proven that ofcom are sexist. |