![]() |
Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24) +--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237) +---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266) +----- Forum: Lucy-Anne Brooks (/forumdisplay.php?fid=420) +----- Thread: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=285) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 |
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 17-06-2015 00:52 Lucy-Anne's post 10pm shows aren't unnecesssary & meaningless along with not lacking visual stimulus for one simple reason, she is still doing the shows so clearly her shows are popular with the people who matter most to s66, the callers. If Lucy-Anne wasn't getting the calls, then s66 won't have her on. Until that is the case, Lucy-Anne will carry on being on past 10pm If you don't like Lucy-Anne's post 10pm shows then as Lucy-Anne herself says, turn over. That's what I do rather than watch her and rant. RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 17-06-2015 01:17 ^Ah but if i didnt watch her i might miss that one show where she does suddenly wake up and realise that day and nightshow callers expect different types of show and performance level,which although she is not doing now she might do one day. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 17-06-2015 02:59 There you go again Rammy telling members that they aren't entitled to see a proper nightshow. That bit about she must be bringing the calls in. You say that you aren't biased towards S66 yet you sure as hell are the mouthpiece for this channel ![]() RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - marlowe - 17-06-2015 12:33 (16-06-2015 13:33 )Chef 34 Wrote: I have to admit I think her boob job is one of the best I have seen Yes Lucy's boob job was a big success. She looks fabulous. ![]() RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - stowman - 17-06-2015 14:37 Maybe a good job in comparison to some of the girls on the channels but I much preferred her natural ones. RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 17-06-2015 15:12 (17-06-2015 00:52 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Lucy-Anne's post 10pm shows aren't unnecesssary & meaningless along with not lacking visual stimulus for one simple reason, she is still doing the shows so clearly her shows are popular with the people who matter most to s66, the callers. If Lucy-Anne wasn't getting the calls, then s66 won't have her on. Until that is the case, Lucy-Anne will carry on being on past 10pm Yes Lucy-Anne's tease shows make money for 66 (presumably more money than a current night show babe from there roster would generate in the same slot). But to leave the argument at that would be to ignore the fact that what she and the others who do similar post-10pm strictly tease shows (as opposed to the mini-night show format preferred by some babes) is undeniably a replacement service provided as an alternative because of a failure of capacity to provide the original on behalf of the operator. You see Rammy, your argument can also be reversed back at you: Do you think that 66 would be doing these kinds of shows if they could get more night show performers who could work to the required standard and generate sufficient revenue..? The fact that 66 can't settle on stripping these slots right across the week (despite their best efforts) speaks volumes. 66 can't staff the slots efficiently either way they try; that is the cause of this issue. Their tease format is merely them making the best of a bad job. It is a patch-up form designed to address a staffing problem. It is the replacement bus service of the babe show world! (Just because it happens to "pick up more passengers" than anything else 66 could muster atm doesn't deny a basic credibility and sustainability problem as far as a large body of existing babe show fans are concerned.) To use another analogy I've used before, when I order those baked beans with the sausages in them from my favourite supermarket and they send me the ordinary ones without, I will probably be mildly annoyed, but if they keep doing it week after week I will get completely vexed! They have consistently not delivered my preference, what I have grown accustomed to, and what I expected from them over many years. In other words for a lot of babe show fans the continued use of these slots increases their frustrations not diminishes them. These are not enforced changes made to meet regulations, they are economic ones designed to offer something the suits the supplier more than many (even of not a majority) of its customer base. To have a babe come on here essentially try to shut down criticism (as far too many try to do) with a "get over it" is merely going to aggravate the problem. Can you think of any customer service representative that would do anything similar in any other industry?! And btw, why are the vast majority of babes that post on here so defensive in their posts?! This is a forum set up to express a passion for their chosen profession and instead of questioning why there is so much criticism of their recent output many seem so content to dismiss with a "bloody whinger" type comments. Has the current social media landscape (so easy to blank out negativity of any kind) made them all so touchy?! The oft quoted, "there is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about," seems apt. Some babes should be careful least we all stop caring for what they do and find a new way to spend our money. RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - jizzman - 17-06-2015 16:21 I just want to see Boobs, not sure why that is too much to ask for. RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Goodfella3041 - 17-06-2015 19:15 (17-06-2015 16:21 )jizzman Wrote: I just want to see Boobs Honesty. Love it! RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 17-06-2015 22:36 (17-06-2015 16:21 )jizzman Wrote: I just want to see Boobs, not sure why that is too much to ask for.It would seem it is too much to ask,especially from a babe who has no respect for the reasonable notion of being topless on nights,she is perhaps unwise to criticise the very people who do still spend their money calling the shows as well as being on this forum,in summary she would do well to learn to not aggrevate her potential customer base any further than she has already,particularly in what is increasingly becoming a call stat led industry where a lot of babes seem to be getting less time to establish themselves RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - jizzman - 26-06-2015 16:27 Lucy looks well gorgeous today, such a pretty face. |