+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 21-12-2010 21:44
looks like the tv shows are now called xplicit and the website instead of being called teaseme tv is now called xxxcited tv. agree about the osg's being too big
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - stueyboy - 21-12-2010 21:46
(21-12-2010 21:20 )iloveMegan Wrote: Still called Bang Babes on the EPG, same sets, girls etc. The only new thing are the OSGs, which are too big, too distracting, and too ugly for my liking. Bang had really good OSGs too
I agree with you matey. The new graphics look bigger than before, the combination of red and black is definitely less "pretty", and the worse thing of all is that 3G Video graphic, with the constantly moving image of a girl (Lily I think?)
If anything, I reckon many of us TV viewers/callers would have loved to see smaller graphics, so that less of the girls' bodies were covered by OSGs.
Also, the colours before (blue, pink, purple) were kind of pretty and feminine, if you know what I mean, and these went well with the gorgeous women on screen.
The 3G video graphic might have been designed to catch your eye, and it certainly does that - but it totally distracts me from the presenter on screen. I cannot watch for very long before getting irritated by it.
I used to phone in quite often but I can't see myself doing that now they have loud, garish graphics, which look bigger than before, and that extremely annoying 3G thing
To be honest, I've never gone so far as saying that something about the Babechannels has really pissed me off, but this definitely has
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - I-Love-U-Fernanda - 21-12-2010 21:47
(21-12-2010 21:38 )Chilly Wrote: A 'new' name, but it seems they still have the same incompetent people running things behind the scenes.
Yep, last Tuesday they had the wrong number displayed for my girl all morning *266* instead of *226* - Inexcusable (mind you it was a doddle getting through on the blower).
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - eyesonly4u - 21-12-2010 21:47
(21-12-2010 21:38 )Chilly Wrote: A 'new' name, but it seems they still have the same incompetent people running things behind the scenes.
surely u can't mean mr bhatti he is such an intelligent inovative person
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Scotsman - 21-12-2010 22:17
Doesn't it take a certain amount of time for the EPG to change?
I was expecting them to go for a name change. Don't see what difference this will make to Ofcom? Surely they'll notice it's the exact same company and channel with a different name?
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr williams - 21-12-2010 23:25
Michelle Thorne on the late shift tonight
Don't know if it means anything, but if you look at the graphics, the "text 88912" for pictures ad has Lucy Z, Dionne, Kerry Louise, Donna, Tori.......and Emma Spellar!
Another one going over to nights maybe???
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mr williams - 21-12-2010 23:43
I see what you mean about the size of the graphics - Lynsey was totally hidden behind them on 948 a few minutes ago. Sort it, guys!
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - mrichie10 - 22-12-2010 00:13
lynsey being on these past few nites as been a real treat great pair of tit i definitely missed those B-p
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - Krill Liberator - 22-12-2010 01:21
A great pair of tits is no good if they constantly dip below the OSG - camera-guy! Report to the Public Execution Area!
RE: Bangbabes Discussion Thread - vostok 1 - 22-12-2010 05:16
New OSG: Genius.
Staff meeting:
"We are now broadcasting on one third less channels than before, that will be one third less income coming in. What do we do? "
"We make the OSG 33% bigger, that means we increase call volumes by 33%, maths and science, innit?"
They must have borrowed the Cellcast op's manual. Roll on the black boxes and the constant
"If we keep ramming our wares down these tossers throats then they are bound to fork out, aren't they?"