RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - bombshell - 10-01-2015 09:31
(09-01-2015 23:20 )Liverred Wrote: No offence intended to Ella but as a new signing I think she is totally UNDERWHELMING! If I was in charge of s66 she would not even be in my top 20 possible choices for a new recruit. Hazel Bond is on Xpanded which is like Lionel Messi playing for a Championship side. She deserves to be performing at the top level!
Cannot argue with that for me Hazel was the ultimate night girl when on Elite.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 10-01-2015 09:42
Hazel did go to another channel but went back to xxpanded some of you have to face facts some girls like working for certain channels however how much we want to see them at other channels
ok ella isnt one to go naked but shes loyal will work 10-5:30 without complaint never misses shows and will prob cover other people's no shows the fact shes been at 2 stations all her babeshow career and if bs hadnt got rid of her to cut costs 3 years ago she might have been still be there
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - FusRoDuh - 10-01-2015 11:39
I'd love to know what constitutes a good show on S66. Pretty much 99 percent of the girls perform like that of worse. But I remember th same stuff being said about Kandi when she first signed for S66 then you know she's was number 2 runner up for ultimate babe so....
Also no offence but let's take off the rose tinted specs Elite was a long time ago for Hazel.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - TheProf - 10-01-2015 20:33
In exchange for the many £'s it costs us - Callers expect to have a stimulating conversation with a girl who:-
1) Is capable of talking to strangers of all ages/ types/ accents in a friendly and open way - and not expect the caller to do all the talking!!!.
2) Has sufficient knowledge about sexual practices to stimulate their caller - as appropriate to their desires.
The girls currently employed by S66 do not meet these criteria, which is no great surprise considering their apparent age and in some cases, undeveloped physicality. ( I think that S66 is sailing close to the mark of acceptability here)
This is not a YTS scheme or charity with trainees and apprentices. It costs a lot of moolah to phone the channels these days.
That is why Ella / Victoria / Emma / Chloe etc. etc. are needed by S66 - because experience is vital to the economy of the channels. They know how to talk to customers.
Windowshoppers/ Freeloaders are only interested in the visual appearance of the presenters so it doesn't matter a jot to them whether the girls can speak a sensible sentence or not.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Phonebook - 10-01-2015 22:56
Amy and Kerrie Lee look so good together. Hoping they both get naked after 11.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Phonebook - 10-01-2015 23:16
Kerrie Lee naked and oiled. Amy next to her, oiled and just needs to get her knickers off.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Liverred - 11-01-2015 01:19
Sophia looks sooo good in that blue dress but FOR FUCK SAKE do some CLOSE UPS!!!!!
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Liverred - 11-01-2015 01:20
Victorias spread legs look so inviting
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - smoothy - 12-01-2015 00:07
Woahhhh who's this girl in the purple lingerie next to Jade? Love her boobs.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 12-01-2015 01:37
^^^^
she's called Jessica Kelly, a fairly recent addition to s66
|