+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - RESPONSIBLE ADULT - 22-04-2012 17:03
(22-04-2012 16:56 )eagle_si Wrote:(22-04-2012 13:48 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: Some may say "cutting of your nose to spite your face" but all anyone can do if you want a change of attitude from the programme makers, Is to stop buying their product. From today, no one phone's the studio's. No one hands over their fivers or tenners for p.p.v, and by tomorrow I am sure they, ( the programme makers) will have pulled the plug and called it a day. Thus leaving the way open for someone a little more enterprising than the present shower. Lets face it, without these programmes in their present state would we really be losing anything of any value? Myself, I don't think we would. But I very much doubt that I belong to a majority, and this post will fall on deaf ears I'm afraid.
Who the fuck are you to tell me what I should do with my money that I've earned myself? If you think you know so much about what a good babe channel should be like, then start your own channel. Or maybe you can apply to be a producer. I'm sure they'd be falling over themselves to take you on.
Only answer any mail of mine when you learn to be polite. Thank you.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eagle_si - 22-04-2012 17:19
(22-04-2012 17:03 )RESPONSIBLE ADULT Wrote: Only answer any mail of mine when you learn to be polite. Thank you.
I'll answer any "mail" of yours that I want.
How many times are you going to come on here whining about how you don't like the channels anymore? You're entitled to your opinion, but also people who like what they offer are entitled to theirs too. If you don't like them, don't watch. But your attitude of "I don't like them, so they may as well close down" stinks. Good luck with your "campaign", but it won't affect me. Every time I call one of the girls on Elite, I have the added pleasure of knowing it annoys you that someone is financially supporting a business that you want destroyed.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 22-04-2012 23:53
Fuck me how anybody can get off on this watered down piss is beyond me, I tune in night after night in the slim possibilty that I might see a better show than the night before last and the night before that one, the list goes on, I'd have to be a mathematician to actually tell you the last time I seen a pussy on a late night babe channel because of the cunts Ofcom laying down the fucking law. I've been analytical about them on my last post, now I'm just downright fucking pissed off. We have debated these bunch of fuckwits until the cow's have come home but to no avail. I have nothing further to add other than one way or another this watered down piss is going to have to end at some point, this Ofcom rule for having stricter rules for teleshopping channels which is what the babe channels classification falls under is fucking bullshit, it's either all OK or none of it is, biggest croc of shit ever as far as rules are concerned, I say fuck the rules and fuck Ofcom
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 23-04-2012 01:17
I really wish this forum had the influence to force the channels to take a stand but the reality is that if every member stopped phoning up it would only result in a small drop in their income. For every viewer who goes to the trouble of signing up to a website there are at least 10 who keep quiet about it. Thats the same if we are talking about paying callers or nonpaying.
And as I have said before, digital switchover is massively increasing the market delivering new viewers faster than old ones get pissed off.
I dont believe for a second that Ofcom represents the will of the people. Most people don't care either way. In a mature democracy most people don't care about goernment either because they havent had to fight for it and most decisions dont affect them. Most decisions only affect a small number of people at any one time. On top of that a small number of people are concerned about principle. But try explaining to the middle aged cashier at Tesco why access to stong sex on TV matters and you will just get a blank stare. And asked if you have a clubcard. (Or a grin and asked what you are doing after work. Honestly I cant go back there.)
Ofcom reckon 4% of the population view adult channels sometimes and 1% regularly. Some of those will never have seen a naked woman and will be happy for the first year or so. But when they are older they will realise just how much they have been shortchanged and wonder why.
They will also regret it when other sources of adult material have to follow the same rules. Ofcom already licences Video On Demand.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 23-04-2012 01:32
Sorry, two posts in a row on the same thread, but cant see anywhere better to put this.
People talk about "harm" from adult channels but there are other forms of harm. This story caught my eye. Did the woman in question have an uncontrolled shopping habit? Was she really rational? (The judge said yes). Did she ever wear the clothes and jewelery? For a few people gambling or shopping can be addictive, the spin of the wheel releases adreneline regardless of the result, the kerching of the till releases a serotonin.
Care home manager stole £338,000 to lead high life
When police raide Jenny Glanisters home they discovered 15 fur coats, racks of designer clothes, unopened bottles of champagne and a receipt for a £3,400 cruise. They also discovered she spent £233,000 with a TV shopping channel on 180 items of jewellery.
Between 2004 and 2010 she stole £338,805 from Oakfeild Ltd where she worked as a finance manager for two care homes.
Metro 18/4/2012
RE: Ofcom Discussion - mr mystery - 23-04-2012 14:38
The latest Ofcom broadcast bulletin issue number 204 23/4/2012 is out .
Just been having a quick look and it looks like the BS shows with the Ofcom licence and RLC/Playboy are Ofcom's main targets .
Get Lucky TV Sky Sky channel 909 has been found in breach for material shown on the Dirty Wives show on the 15/2/2012 , i've not read through it all yet but apparently it was for showing to explicit material not long after the 9pm watershed . This is the only babe channel found to be in breach .
Babe channels currently under investigation are :
Masti Chat on the channel named Party on freeview for something shown on 18/3/2012.
RLC 4 for something shown on 23/3/2012 .
Complaints received and not investigated concerning the babe channels are :
Playboy TV Chat on these dates :9/3/12 , 11/3/2012 , 29/3/2012
Elite Days :5/3/2012
Babes From TV on Get Lucky TV :22/3/2012 .
Dirty Wives on the freeview Party channel : 11/3/12
PS i may have missed a few , only had a quick look so far .
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 23-04-2012 15:08
So the Ofcom bandwagon moves into another gear, no fucking surprise then is it, what the fuck for this time I wonder, fuck me I allways seem to miss the so-called explicit stuff, must have been out of the house at the time they decided to get the dildo's out and started to lick out each other's fanny's shortly followed by the cameraman then getting dragged into the action and given a blow job live on the telly whilst spraying his love piss all over the camera lenses which then had to be cleaned, you'd think this was the type of material that Ofcom would get hot under the collar about, not this watered down rat's piss that we have to endure night after night. Again to reinstate my view's, Ofcom can go fuck themselves, repressive bunch of cunts they are
RE: Ofcom Discussion - winsaw - 23-04-2012 15:24
(23-04-2012 14:38 )mr mystery Wrote: RLC 4 for something shown on 23/3/2012 .
just had a look at who was on that night and it was Dionne Mendez, now i would have thought she was one of the safer girls on the channels, on the night in question she had a dress on for most of the night so god knows what they think she did
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 23-04-2012 15:38
(23-04-2012 14:38 )mr mystery Wrote: Babe channels currently under investigation are :
Masti Chat on the channel named Party on freeview for something shown on 18/3/2012.
Judging from that date, and providing it was the same feed that went out on Sky, I think I'm almost certain I know to what this is referring, without even looking at the bulletin. There were three girls that night, with most of them spending a lot of time naked. One in particular was allowed to get away with some very relaxed positions, even when naked - I suspect the camera was not being manned at it never flinched once.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - broncobilly10 - 23-04-2012 15:48
Maybe some day it will become clear to ofcom that as adults we don't need protecting from shows that even in the height of there fame would not offend anyone who set out to watch them. Constant moaning from rival channels should be ignored let the best channel win simple as.