The UK Babe Channels Forum
Bluebird Films - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bluebird TV (/forumdisplay.php?fid=165)
+---- Thread: Bluebird Films (/showthread.php?tid=13858)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64

RE: Bluebird - Sooky™ - 22-02-2010 01:24

Would the performers in your bi vids appreciate the term 'gay' being used as a derogatory remark?

and btw - CAPS is deemed poor forum ettiquette

RE: Bluebird - rfarver1975 - 22-02-2010 09:15

(22-02-2010 01:16 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote:  
(21-02-2010 07:34 )vostok 1 Wrote:  I linked to a forum used by photographers in your industry.
The post that I linked to was made by someone who has hired and photographed Mel Rook. He claimed that he spoke to Mel on the phone recently, (in a professional basis, not as part of a "phone fantasy") who told him the situation that he mentioned in his post.

Now, if you wish to humiliate me to the forum and convincingly label me as an "anti-Blue-obsessive ®", then a good course of action would be to ...

You're doing fine on your own - ne help needed. Copy all the anti-Bluebird posts you made on this and other forums.

(21-02-2010 07:34 )vostok 1 Wrote:  Now, if you wish to humiliate me to the forum and convincingly label me as an "anti-Blue-obsessive ®", then a good course of action would be to convey a message from Mel Rook stating that she finds my link to the models club forum as "Sad and Gay".

Bless you: You're reading the wrong post. Try reading what we actually replied to your post again.

(21-02-2010 07:34 )vostok 1 Wrote:  But please bear in mind, I have on no occasion published any criticism of the elderly, hairy, out of shape "Stud".

Oh dear - you just couldn't help going all sad and gay could ya ! Tongue


[Moderator Notice: Post edited to correct misquoting and remove uppercase posting]

You're slowly turning into a bit of a homophobic bully aren't you calling anyone that you disagree with you gay.

Grow the f*ck up man.

RE: Bluebird - SirAssAlot - 22-02-2010 10:38

Porn is seeing naked ladies in various positions fully nude OR sucking - fucking etc but the word porn in bluebirds vocabulary is a dark set, Crap / Annoying camera work & fully dressed ladies with their tits pulled out over their tops & their panties pulled to 1 side showing their pussies annoyed annoyed

I just hope Bluebird doesn't make a balls up of Anna's & Porcha's movie's because if they do I’ll be really pissed of and my guess is so will a lot of other people.

RE: Bluebird - m100 - 22-02-2010 12:26

(22-02-2010 01:16 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote:  Oh dear - you just couldn't help going all sad and gay could ya ! Tongue

The south park - cartman tribute act might have been funny about ten years ago.

RE: Bluebird - Porcha - SirAssAlot - 22-02-2010 15:35

(18-02-2010 01:27 )BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL Wrote:  Don't worry - Portia's found a better Channel:
TV BABES XXX
DVD out in June worldwide.

Web Scene available when GLAMBIRDS.com launches.

I had a look at that pic thx for that.

You've done the same thing yet AGAIN Fully dressed babes with their tits pulled out over the top of their clothes & panties pulled to 1 side showing pussy. Bloody hell the point in porn is that the girls show all of their gorgeous body Not just tits pulled out over their tops etc.

What a balls up of an Extremely hot babes movie. Typical

RE: Bluebird - pipolo - 22-02-2010 17:50

(22-02-2010 12:18 )apashley Wrote:  ANy plans on Holly James doing anything hardcore??

good question.
Any news?

RE: Bluebird - SirAssAlot - 22-02-2010 18:05

(22-02-2010 17:50 )pipolo Wrote:  
(22-02-2010 12:18 )apashley Wrote:  ANy plans on Holly James doing anything hardcore??

good question.
Any news?

What's the point because Bluebird's films are fully dressed or in poor lighting. So you’ll not get to see anything anyway laugh

RE: Bluebird - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 01:34

Quote:What's the point because Bluebird's films are fully dressed or in poor lighting. So you’ll not get to see anything anyway laugh

See - this is again why we have to respond. You made this point once. It is supposed to be a fact. We responded and pointed you to just some of the more than 100 Titles where what you say plainly is not true.

You ignored that: and continue to promote what you want to say with total disregard to the facts.

So that people can judge for themselves: here's just 3 stills from all those movies: plainly [a] they are not poorly lit and [b] the performers are not fully dressed.

[Image: image.php?twg_album=POOR+LIGHTING+FULLY+...type=thumb][Image: image.php?twg_album=POOR+LIGHTING+FULLY+...type=thumb][Image: image.php?twg_album=POOR+LIGHTING+FULLY+...type=thumb]

Your only rational response now is to say "Well I have seen some BB stuff which I happen to think was poorly lit and where the performers were working in European style costuming (reference Harmony, Marc Dorcel, Private, etc etc). And I don't like that style - personally."

You wanna state your opinion - go right ahead. You want to dress your opinion up with completely false facts about our company's Films - expect a response.

Fair enough ?

RE: Bluebird - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 01:38

(22-02-2010 01:24 )SxciiSooky Wrote:  Would the performers in your bi vids appreciate the term 'gay' being used as a derogatory remark?

Yes. Given that we actually work with and know them very well, our bi-players commonly use the word 'gay' both to describe a person's sexual orientation, and to derogate from someone or something.

and btw - CAPS is deemed poor forum ettiquette

So, it is good forum etiquette is it to hurl highly offensive abuse at performers is it ? Because that is where this series of posts started.

RE: Bluebird - BLUEBIRD OFFICIAL - 23-02-2010 01:42

Quote:You're slowly turning into a bit of a homophobic bully aren't you calling anyone that you disagree with you gay.
Grow the f*ck up man.

This run of posts began because a couple of bullies-by-anonymity decided to hurl Abuse at one of our performers. We responded with our usual mix of politeness and sarcasm.

Will you now apply both your bullying epithet and your *** to the Posters who issued the original abuse ?

Or are you only interested in finding opportunities to pop at BB - as you have on another Forum ?