+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Euro Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=346)
+---- Thread: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=46227)
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - gooner bob - 05-02-2015 09:59
Yes it's an extra channel. Better than simulcasting Babestation Blue all night, so it's a thumbs up from me.
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 05-02-2015 11:44
A true horror show unfolded last night, ETV do us all a favour and get the fuck off the SKY EPG as it's obvious for all to see that your show is unworkable under ofcunt.
Fuck me, even xXpanded TV was 10 times more explicit than this channel was last night, the worst debut I've ever seen on our Adult EPG in all my years of watching the babe channels. Atrocious from start to finish
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 05-02-2015 12:40
I agree with HannahsPet & Gooner Bob. It better to have EuroBabes than a repeat channel for Babestation.
I find it odd that there isn't one tread for any of the babes..
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - whizzer - 05-02-2015 12:58
I thought the first night was OK. The only thing I didn't like is the camera constantly changing from girl to girl, so anyone I liked was suddenly off the screen. That aside it wasn't bad at all.
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 05-02-2015 13:02
the only thing I liked was that it meant 945 was no longer duplicating another bs channel, otherwise very disappointing and didn't live up at all to the hype that bs were giving it
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - Bandwagon - 05-02-2015 13:02
Optimistically speaking, yes it's a new show for 2015 and the only thing we've lost is a pointless simulcast.
But who will ring them at those prices for that performance level, seriously?
But then it was only their first night, so perhaps things will improve and I hope they do.
I'd rather have Starlets back though
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 05-02-2015 13:24
Well, I thought a couple of the girls on last night were pretty attractive, which is step one in holding some interest. Who knows which name goes with which girl though, and without a screencap allowed for i.d. purposes, it was all a jumble.
Just as I find something interesting to look at, the view suddenly cuts to a close-up on the other side of the studio; that must be annoying for callers, let alone viewers.
At one point, there was a cameraman filming another cameraman, filming a girl. All with wires hanging out of them.
The overall effect that came to me was that it looked like five magician's assistants standing around a stage waiting for the magic that didn't happen.
It gets points for curiosity value so far, see how long that lasts.
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - ETV_guest - 05-02-2015 14:05
yesterday the girls were :
Lara
Lauren
Monique
Jasmine
Keira
usually Lara and Jasmine and Keira have 1 or max 2 shifts per week in the night Monique and Lauren 2 or 3.
Very rarely the girls have more than 3 shifts in the NS.
Until last week the schedule for NS is pretty standard, but now something may change.
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 05-02-2015 14:10
(05-02-2015 13:24 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Well, I thought a couple of the girls on last night were pretty attractive, which is step one in holding some interest.
Mate the girls can be the most stunning in the world but if they aren't allowed to perform a proper nightshow for us then we haven't yet reached any step. Nothing should be defended for last nights debacle, ETV should be hung out to dry.
RE: EuroBabes - Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 05-02-2015 14:10
There were 5 babes on last night, but I seem to remember at least 8-10 girls on last time that they were on Sky.
Was the 8-10 babes just at weekends or have they reduced the number of girls on the show. Or do I fisherman's sydrome and things were always better (and bigger) before.