(25-11-2017 16:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  (More alphabet soup anyone?! )

<snip>
* Hex!t named the guy as "Paul".

(25-11-2017 16:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  (More alphabet soup anyone?! )

Hairbald makes some good wider points... I've spoken about the closeting world of social media on here before. It is quite evidently one of the reasons why less babes post on the forum now than was once the case. Twitter and the rest are far more easily controlled environments and havens for the diva who can surround herself with only an echo chamber of positivity. How easy it must be to believe all your own press in such a world.

I suppose the avoidance of stigma is one of the things motivating the babes in trying to keep the content levels they do in private away from the public-eye... But as I see it, it is the same conceit that I was outling in my previous post that actually brought us to this latest babe rebellion on cam. Look at this...

(22-11-2017 17:22 )babefan2012 Wrote:  ...they never considered what’s happening now happening. It’s incredible naivety from these babes. Whether it’s beyond a pay wall is irrelevant, anything that’s done online or on cam will never stay private 1000%...

Well, for me, it could be called naivete but the mighty vehemence of some of the babes prolonged tweeting on this smacked more of an overwhelming conceit flouted I feel. The babes that have been caught out by this Outlaw dude* (and presumably others of his ilk) sound like they have had their pride knifed, their pomposity pricked, and by, horror of horrors, a lowlife 'saddo' at that. Being caught out by one of the pond scum does not go down well in this sphere.

Thing is these babes were duped and deceived by their own skewed view of their world if I'm any judge. I think it's not that they didn't consider a major upload breach but that they dismissed it because they thought that they controlled, owned, these punters. More, these babes thought they were forever secured, not by fragile technology, but because they believe that they know every joe's mind and think they can always spot a external paypig. They thought their emotional manipulations would always mean they could keep the bigger payers in line. None of these poor losers would be illogical and rebellious enough to give away top content material they'd paid through the nose for - surely... It was a bad misjudgement - with the babes finally being overly emboldened by their self-set, sky high, price tags too.

Maybe someone exploited the exploiters - a guy playing along as just another sucker whilst always having this in mind if he ever felt hard done by or whatever.

Or was this Outlaw even the actual uploader? Maybe it's just as often a pretty please 'private' sharer who does the definitive deed. Not everyone is going to put the same great value on the blurry ass he sees on his file as the babe in question does. (The original recorder is just as dum in this scenario too of course - it only takes one weak link in any sharing chain for stuff to go public.)

So I guess the babes were naive... not over the tech, but in not factoring in their own deceiving sense of overweening superiority when making their cam choices.

* Hex!t named the guy as "Paul".

(22-11-2017 10:41 )Robot Devil Wrote:  ^ Bingo! It really IS simple: if, ladies, you're shilling yourselves on cam - doing stuff you wouldn't do otherwise - stop. Just stop. If you're so hypocritical that you refuse to PUBLICLY do certain things - whether it's showing your tits/pussy, or going even further - but you WILL gladly do it when lots of money is thrown your way, then you have no reason to piss and moan. So there's a few blurry, slow vids up. End of the world - it ain't. Don't want people seeing what you will do when money is offered up? Then don't do it!

(25-11-2017 17:47 )HEX!T Wrote:  

(25-11-2017 16:27 )ShandyHand Wrote:  (More alphabet soup anyone?! )

<snip>
* Hex!t named the guy as "Paul".

emma c outed him as paul mate.