+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Hall Of Fame (/forumdisplay.php?fid=359)
+---- Thread: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=80446)
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Kingsmind - 22-11-2020 23:39
(22-11-2020 23:17 )Charlemagne Wrote: ^^ Goodfella mentioned managers, referee etc. I think that someone nominated Mr P
There's an option that I been pondering.
Still have two girl inducted but with different criteria.
1. Over 5 year or even 6 years since they started on a show (existing criteria)
2. Over 12 years since they started on a show.
But is that defeating the fewer rules in a competition the better.
5 years or even 6 years the way it is now sounds fine to me , 12 years seems way to long because wouldn't it narrow down the babes that are eligible to be nominated?. Plus i think it would be hard work thinking of babes that have been on it for 12 years 12 years is a long time you know
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Boomerangutangangbang - 22-11-2020 23:56
^^ There you go, someone who is too young to remember some of our Babeshow Big Hitters. That's why you need a panel to decide.
What Charle said is babes that have been on the shows 12 years ago, not on the shows for 12 years.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Glenn Miller - 23-11-2020 01:37
(22-11-2020 22:34 )Kingsmind Wrote: you look on sporting awards there is just 1 Hall Of Fame vote and that's it you don't get day and nights and stuff like that
What about music? There's a Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, a Country Hall of Fame, a Rhythm & Blues, a Jazz, a Hip Hop, a Gospel and others. Elvis has been inducted into 14 different genres of music Halls of Fame.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Kingsmind - 23-11-2020 03:07
(22-11-2020 23:56 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: ^^ There you go, someone who is too young to remember some of our Babeshow Big Hitters. That's why you need a panel to decide.
What Charle said is babes that have been on the shows 12 years ago, not on the shows for 12 years.
I understand what Charle said maybe i just didn't put it right.
And i was talking about there maybe being lesser babes to pick from if we go back 12 years not just for me but for all of us like for example Scarlett Jones would be eligible next year she wouldn't be if we went back 12 years same with Atlanta you get what i mean? and i never did say i was to young for the shows.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - eyres42 - 23-11-2020 06:19
Girls who show tits, ass and pussy will always be more popular, it is why many of us watch the shows after all.
The nomination stage needs to be changed, 18 facing the starting gun is too many. If you don't want a panel to select a shortlist then ask voters to nominate 2 girls maximum and then put the top 5-6 to a straight vote, no knockouts.
And for gods sake keep the vote open for longer to give a better representation.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - The Silent Majority - 23-11-2020 07:19
(23-11-2020 06:19 )eyres42 Wrote: The nomination stage needs to be changed, 18 facing the starting gun is too many. If you don't want a panel to select a shortlist then ask voters to nominate 2 girls maximum and then put the top 5-6 to a straight vote, no knockouts.
And for gods sake keep the vote open for longer to give a better representation.
This has a lot of merit. But I would go with 3 nominations, one of whom had to be a day girl.
Then a straight vote for the top 6.
I think this would give the daytime girls more of a chance without having to go down the road of positive discrimination.
And 12 years is way too long. The current 5 year limit for all contenders is fine.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Goodfella3041 - 23-11-2020 12:05
(23-11-2020 07:19 )The Silent Majority Wrote: And 12 years is way too long. The current 5 year limit for all contenders is fine.
You could arguably try to split the difference.
One Hall of Fame, four inductions per annum (which doesn't seem excessive).
Two in the night-time category, with 6-year cut-off and a 12-year cut-off.
Two in the day-time category, with a 6-year cut-off and a 12-year cut-off.
This would address Boomerangutangangbang's point, which I think is a very valid one. A straight, open vote is subject to the inherent bias towards (a) night shows, and (b) recency.
I don't think there is any harm in slanting the process a little to ensure that the Supremes get a chance, without disadvantaging the Spice Girls. Little Mix will just have to wait their turn.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Kingsmind - 23-11-2020 13:04
(23-11-2020 07:19 )The Silent Majority Wrote: And 12 years is way too long. The current 5 year limit for all contenders is fine.
Exactly the same thing i said.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Kingsmind - 23-11-2020 13:07
(23-11-2020 07:19 )The Silent Majority Wrote: This has a lot of merit. But I would go with 3 nominations, one of whom had to be a day girl.
I am still happy with just 1 Hall Of Fame myself like i said there doesn't have to be Day and Nights on everything.
If you want a Day time Hall Of Famer just vote for her in the 1 Hall Of Famer but i guess most people will vote for Night Time Babes like the Newcomer vote for example.
RE: HALL OF FAME Discussion Thread - Goodfella3041 - 23-11-2020 13:26
I'm still not getting the distinction. Nobody is suggesting multiple Halls of Fame. It is all just one Hall of Fame.
The debate seems to be around the number of inductions. And that's fairly standard. I think it is pretty rare in sport, music or film, for example, for a Hall of Fame to induct only one artist or athlete per annum. Even the Nobel Prize has multiple categories across the arts and sciences.
The distinction between a HOF honour and other contests/prizes is partly the rationing of spaces -- which means only the best of the best should get in -- but it's also the irrevocability of the prize. Once you're in, you're in -- as opposed to, say, Babe of the Year, which Grace can win in 2020, but lose in 2021.
As long as those conditions are maintained, then adding categories or increasing the number of inductees (within reason), wouldn't necessarily 'cheapen' the award.