![]() |
Bangbabes - Discussion Thread - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236) +---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Thread: Bangbabes - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7494) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 |
RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - bigguy01 - 22-12-2010 23:31 i hope ofcom has something in place about that sort thing like RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - Rammyrascal - 22-12-2010 23:34 (22-12-2010 23:28 )stueyboy Wrote: To be honest if they are in defiance of Ofcom's new rules then although it makes for excellent TV seeing Danni or any of these girls butt naked, surely they are just asking for trouble yet again? they sure are asking for trouble stueyboy but expect nothing less from bang/xplicit who are incapable these days of playing it safe like the other channels RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - mrmann - 22-12-2010 23:36 The later night shows are now called Xplicit? So can we now see a vagina for once? If not, then why call it Xplicit? It doesn't make any sense. RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - bigguy01 - 22-12-2010 23:48 xplicit hmmm not quite. RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - moorezy24 - 22-12-2010 23:50 how cn ya get it on d web??? RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - rover - 22-12-2010 23:51 I trust l will get royalties for the use of the name. (15-11-2010 23:37 )rover Wrote: Early show:......Morning Glory. http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=2543&pid=667910#pid667910 RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - mrmann - 22-12-2010 23:54 (22-12-2010 23:48 )bigguy01 Wrote: xplicit hmmm not quite. Well then a name change is in order. There's nothing xplicit about covering a normal body part. I hate the word explicit anyway. I hope the women give us what the new title suggests, because we know Ofcom will love it ![]() RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - rover - 23-12-2010 00:00 (22-12-2010 23:54 )mrmann Wrote: Well then a name change is in order. There's nothing xplicit about covering a normal body part. I hate the word explicit anyway. I hope the women give us what the new title suggests, because we know Ofcom will love it Or they could just switch the tv on and watch for themselves. ![]() RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - mrmann - 23-12-2010 00:03 Ha. Yeah, but that would waste their time, and it's so easy to get all the info they need from this forum. What's funny, is that I'm sure many Ofcom employees watch the babe channels, but have to follow the orders because they like being employed ![]() RE: Xplicit (Bangbabes) Discussion Thread - bigguy01 - 23-12-2010 00:06 just saying the name is different to what people might think of what is explicit. |