The UK Babe Channels Forum
US Election & Presidency - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Forum: News Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111)
+---- Thread: US Election & Presidency (/showthread.php?tid=68468)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766


RE: US Election & Presidency - MR PERFECT - 23-02-2017 18:25

(23-02-2017 16:41 )wackawoo Wrote:  
(23-02-2017 15:58 )MR PERFECT Wrote:  Everyone deserves to be treated with respect and dignity.

Everyone? Wink

What a surprise you have a problem with that. Your a Trumpster troll and nothing else. Smile


RE: US Election & Presidency - wackawoo - 23-02-2017 18:38

(23-02-2017 17:11 )munch1917 Wrote:  If there is an issue with someone with 'male parts' entering a female bathroom, what about the situation with a post-op female?
One of the original cases that triggered this off was a state attempting to 'force' people to use the bathroom according to the sex of their birth, so a post-op female, must use a female bathroom, despite now having male genitalia. Apparently the same 'awkward' paradox!

As for using the disabled toilets as an alternative, frankly, that is no better than having people of colour use a different restroom to the whites, or sit at the back of the bus! It was precisely to avoid this kind of fucked up, neanderthal thinking and treat people as equal human beings that this ruling was brought in.

The stance of the Obama administration on this issue was a great step forward for the transgender community not just in the US, but it sent a message across the world, and was particularly significant for the young trans community that is was directed at, who are even more vulnerable.
In a stroke, that forward step has been taken away, and the trans youth of america must be made to feel less safe, somehow 'different, maybe 'wrong', and that is something that will affect them for the rest of their lives.

Another victory for prejudice, but hopefully just a temporary one.

I'll reply to Skully when I have had time to read it all.

Sex of the birth is not what we are talking about here, the article I posted was about identity. You may or may not have had GRS you just have to identify yourself with a certain gender.

It's pretty clear I am talking about pre op, where they ARE physiological and genetically males, dispite what they themselevs feel. Post op they are females, full out no arguments and laws prohibiting transgender females entering a toilet (if there actually could be) would be wholey wrong. That said, transgender people can actually be lesbians, but the usual law of the land would apply to any unlawful issues arising from that the same has any woman.

The rest of your post was just rose tinted Obama glasses and ABC text book pcism that doesn't allow for the full complexity of the situation, nor the objections that some women have.

Males genitals to a lot of women (unless it's on whoever they have an interest in) are very threatening things. Woman aren't like men that want to look at mens bits and pieces all the time. Yes, they will be in cubicals, but woman will also know that such situations can be abuse. They will not want to freshen up, change cloths, have a piss with what they percieve as being a male (new years eve not allowing) in the same room as them. It's not just from the TG point of view, it's from both points of view, poeple like to dismiss the other side as irrelavant prejudice. There's a difference between being hateful prejudice and merely having difficulty in understanding; why would a male find Lisa snowden or Kelly Brook sexually unattractive for example?

You people also seem to think what toilet somebody uses will get rid of predjudice against TG. In the grand scheme of things that will be pretty much irrelavant, most of it will not come from there. It is not much more than an issue that can be pounced on, not unlike women who get the tits out here there and every where to feed their kids when there IS alternatives just to prove a point.

I'd like to bet right here, right now, that if any of you men that's feigning understanding and outrage at the prejudce that if some bloke came a chatting you up you would feel extremely uncomfortable, if you picked a woman up, took her home and found out she had meat and two veg, you would all flip your lids and kick her out the door in one. Some of the comments on the lady boy thread have been boarderline.


RE: US Election & Presidency - wackawoo - 23-02-2017 18:45

(23-02-2017 18:25 )MR PERFECT Wrote:  [quote='MR PERFECT' pid='2005880' dateline='1487865504']
Everyone deserves to be treated with respect and dignity.
--------
What a surprise you have a problem with that. Your a Trumpster troll and nothing else. Smile

Do I have a problem with it? No.

But your intolerance clearly shows your statment to be hypocritical.

You have no respect for anybody who is not a Trump hater, even if it is paranoid invented support that really isn't there.

This latest post reinforces that intollerance.


RE: US Election & Presidency - cwpussylover - 23-02-2017 18:54

wtf is all this meat and 2 veg chat on a presidency thread on a babes forum??HuhHuh can we get back to mrs trumps tits n arse pleaseImportantBig Grin


RE: US Election & Presidency - MR PERFECT - 23-02-2017 18:56

(23-02-2017 18:45 )wackawoo Wrote:  
(23-02-2017 18:25 )MR PERFECT Wrote:  [quote='MR PERFECT' pid='2005880' dateline='1487865504']
Everyone deserves to be treated with respect and dignity.
--------
What a surprise you have a problem with that. Your a Trumpster troll and nothing else. Smile

Do I have a problem with it? No.

But your intolerance clearly shows your statment to be hypocritical.

You have no respect for anybody who is not a Trump hater, even if it is paranoid invented support that really isn't there.

This latest post reinforces that intollerance.
Oh dear the timid Trumpster is upset oh well.


RE: US Election & Presidency - munch1917 - 23-02-2017 19:13

Sex of birth is very relevant to this discussion.
The bill that was passed in North Carolina states that people must use the restroom according to their sex at birth. The 'Obama Ruling' effectively over-ruled that. Now that ruling has been revoked, it is back to square one (there was a court injunction putting the Bathroom Bill on hold, not sure exactly how things stand with all that right now).
It's also possible to get birth certificates changed, but only for those who have undergone surgery, and depending where the individual was actually born.

So if someone hasn't had, or can't get, their birth certificate changed after surgery, they would still be required to use the 'wrong' restroom, even though they are physically the opposite sex.

And can we all accept that transgender applies to both sexes? There are transgender males AND females, it's not just 'chicks with dicks' so let's leave that stereotype behind.


RE: US Election & Presidency - MR PERFECT - 23-02-2017 21:08

Steve Bannon

http://www.rte.ie/news/world/2017/0223/854976-bannon/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Bannon


RE: US Election & Presidency - wackawoo - 23-02-2017 21:14

(23-02-2017 18:56 )MR PERFECT Wrote:  Oh dear the timid Trumpster is upset oh well.

Well thats not very respectful.

Lying about people and not caring if they are upset.

Have a little bit more dignity.


RE: US Election & Presidency - MR PERFECT - 23-02-2017 21:27

(23-02-2017 21:14 )wackawoo Wrote:  
(23-02-2017 18:56 )MR PERFECT Wrote:  Oh dear the timid Trumpster is upset oh well.

Well thats not very respectful.

Lying about people and not caring if they are upset.

Have a little bit more dignity.

Funny guy.


RE: US Election & Presidency - wackawoo - 23-02-2017 21:31

(23-02-2017 19:13 )munch1917 Wrote:  Sex of birth is very relevant to this discussion.
The bill that was passed in North Carolina states that people must use the restroom according to their sex at birth.

Does this include post reassignment? Becasue if it does, that would be wrong. I would absoutley completely agree with you on this point.

Quote:The 'Obama Ruling' effectively over-ruled that. Now that ruling has been revoked, it is back to square one (there was a court injunction putting the Bathroom Bill on hold, not sure exactly how things stand with all that right now).
It's also possible to get birth certificates changed, but only for those who have undergone surgery, and depending where the individual was actually born.

You said it right there. If they have under gone sugery. What it states in that link, and what i have been saying, is it applies to people who FEEL like they are traped in ther wrong sexed body - PRE OP. How can you possibly keep getting that wrong? you clearly haven't read a word I have put.

Quote:So if someone hasn't had, or can't get, their birth certificate changed after surgery, they would still be required to use the 'wrong' restroom, even though they are physically the opposite sex.

And can we all accept that transgender applies to both sexes? There are transgender males AND females, it's not just 'chicks with dicks' so let's leave that stereotype behind.

You probbaly need to read my post a little more carefully, I have mentioned both male to female and female to male, that nelson eye again. But the link states that FEMALES are uncomfortable with what they perceive to be males in the toilets with them, it mentions nothing about men feeling uncomfortable with female to males in the toilet. Women and men absolutly think differently here.

I am also stating that it would be heterosexual men that are more likely to try and exploit this, has Skully already provided an example of, it would be very unlikely to be a woman to male problem.

And chicks with dicks is very offensive.