+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Lucy-Anne Brooks (/forumdisplay.php?fid=420)
+----- Thread: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=285)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 20-10-2015 17:19
(19-10-2015 21:53 )FantasyNinja Wrote: Absolute piss take. Close up on the face, so the cam people get to see tits and those on tv get nothing after 10pm. What makes Lucy so special that she can do this on a night show.Got to agree Lucy's post 10pm appearances have all been woeful,whether it be down to set,outfit or attitude towards freeloaders/potential callers or in the case of last night ALL THREE!!!,basically it was the usual bollocks with the added kick in the teeth of getting the producers to agree to over censor her show without good reason,in summary another 50 odd minutes taken from nights to satisfy a babe who thinks she is cut above other babes and should be allowed to get away with these poor excuses of a nightshow,i would also say if ex Bluebird boss has taken over,this is exactly the kind of babe who would never have been on BB nights,so if she is so keen on webcamming why not stick to that rather than further devaluing a dying tv genre to suit herself rather than the many potential she could have by not having such a bad attitude. 1/10
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - kifkiz - 20-10-2015 17:33
The problem is its actually working
Its the second time shes done it and both times shes had people on cam and been busy on the phones as well basically increasing the typical income from a tease hour. S66 are in the business of making money and if you're the boss you probably aren't going to discourage that.
shes worked out her limits of what she can do and get away with and people are still calling probably because she is hot as fuck
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 20-10-2015 17:43
Disagree, Lucy's tease shows (including when she's on past 10pm) these days are quite good. She's moving round more than she does during the day, she's constantly flashing her knickers & very nice arse. Also her boobs are threatening to escape from her dress.
Most importantly for Lucy-Anne & s66, she seems to be busy/very busy on the phones and therefore bringing in the money and as long as that is the case, s66 will keep having her on doing tease shows until they don't make money
Also the time lucy-anne takes away from the regular s66 channels is very very little. S66 do 22 1/2 hours of nightshow output each night and lucy-anne is on for usually around 1-2 hours. If you don't like Lucy-Anne's tease shows then don't keep watching her when she does them. You know what she does and already know you don't like it so what's the point of watching her
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - FantasyNinja - 20-10-2015 17:45
I wonder how the genuine night girls feel about it though. There expected to be tits out as soon as a caller asks for it and Lucy get this kind of specialist treatment. Your absolutely right Jimmyt73 if this is how she is going to operate, stick to cam and give those people who are paying per minute an actual show.
Edit;
So Lucy wont get topless on TV but, 33 seconds in.
http://www.studio66tv.com/videos/
You will never defeat the freeloaders.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - teewee - 20-10-2015 17:59
(20-10-2015 17:43 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Disagree, Lucy's tease shows (including when she's on past 10pm) these days are quite good. She's moving round more than she does during the day, she's constantly flashing her knickers & very nice arse. Also her boobs are threatening to escape from her dress.
Most importantly for Lucy-Anne & s66, she seems to be busy/very busy on the phones and therefore bringing in the money and as long as that is the case, s66 will keep having her on doing tease shows until they don't make money
Also the time lucy-anne takes away from the regular s66 channels is very very little. S66 do 22 1/2 hours of nightshow output each night and lucy-anne is on for usually around 1-2 hours. If you don't like Lucy-Anne's tease shows then don't keep watching her when she does them. You know what she does and already know you don't like it so what's the point of watching her
![[Image: th_363954391_whiteknight_122_245lo.jpg]](http://img106.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=th_363954391_whiteknight_122_245lo.jpg)
I see you have arrived
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 20-10-2015 19:13
it seems like no established daybabe will ever have poor call stats simply because there are so many sad blokes out there who will call up any daybabe just for a bit of companionship, they aren't bothered if she does or shows fuck all when doing tease shows, if Lucy wanted to she could do a dayshow/teaseshow all night and she would still bring in the calls because there are so many mugs who would call her, S66 aren't going to give a fuck about a few people moaning on a forum but what would there be to talk about if we didn't complain
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - stowman - 21-10-2015 08:07
Got to say that the tease show has been taken to new dimensions by the likes of Mikaela and Mikki B showing Lucy Anne in a poor light. I watch Lucy Anne because I think she's a good looking girl and like her - I even subscribed to her website at one time and have watched some of her cam shows. Unfortunately the first 20 minutes of her show were pathetic (even less than the 1/10 Fantasy Ninja gave it). She spent her time constantly trying to ensure her boobs didn't even slightly slip out of her dress, making sure the perve cam was in the correct position and adjusting her panties so she wasn't revealing too much of herself. As she was trying to stand up at the time she was finding all three difficult so there was little movement. Having decided to solve the problem by lying down, we had an extremely static show because of the perve cam.
When she eventually lay on her back so we got good panty flashes (I like her in black thongs) the camera then moved to long close ups of her face for whatever reason. At this point I went to bed. Sadly I think parts of her day show were sexier and more revealing than her tease show. Watching her reposition a camera, flick her hair from side to side and see close ups of albeit a pretty face is not my definition of tease.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Zai47 - 21-10-2015 10:54
I agree Lucy shouldn't tease hours waste of time.
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Ducky - 21-10-2015 14:43
Had a right good wank over her during the tease hour.
Didn't have to ring her up, she was already being provocative enough onscreen, so twenty five minutes after tuning in, I was on my way up to bed, happy & satisfied without the added guilt of my bank account being £40 emptier.
Keep up the good work, Lucy
RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 23-10-2015 16:05
So excited for her full night show tonight! Can't believe she's on until 5:30am!!! Will she go naked???
Bet in a few hours, she's removed from the schedule...
