+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Storm (/forumdisplay.php?fid=115)
+---- Thread: Storm - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=32660)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - The Truth - 27-09-2012 17:12
I think some of the "SHIT" written in here is more than a little disrespectful,referring to a show as like watching crufts is taking the piss,and as for comparing the models performances with that of Hannah & Courtney is clearly peoples lust for nudity.
I'm not going disagree that the picture quality is not good,but model performances are easily on a par with most babechannels broadcasting at this time,of course criticism is par for the course with babeshows,as individual tastes are subjective but insults are not big & not clever.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - dan g 27 - 27-09-2012 17:18
(27-09-2012 17:02 )Scottishbloke Wrote: I've praised this channel in the past and now I'm saying on record here that this channel is a shadow of it's former self. Also if it was going that good then why was it only 26p a minute to phone last night, looks bloody desperate to me.I'm not a financial expert by any means, but isn't having calls cheaper kind of a good thing to help bring in customers.
Wouldn't any person just say to himself oh look 26p a minute for a call thats great value for me and the channel itself would be thinking well with cheaper calls, then its most likely more people would call, as they would want to take advantage of such a deal.
Its like shopping at Tesco, if people see a certain food such as custard doughnuts going on sale for a dirt cheap price, people would go crazy for it, because they are getting a great deal particularly in these harsh economic times
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 27-09-2012 17:19
(27-09-2012 17:12 )the truth Wrote: comparing the models performances with that of Hannah & Courtney is clearly peoples lust for nudity.
So what's your point exactly, those 2 were outstanding, not only did they get naked, they also got into a lot of erotic positions, for the record I've phoned Courtney a couple of times in the past (back in the day when it was £1.53 a minute to phone)
and she was fantastic, very warm and she really liked my Scottish accent. She even asked me if she could move in with me, to which I replied - obviously yes
Also the onscreen chemistry she had just automatically connected you to her. Courtney to me is the first thing that comes to my mind when I think of this channel. Not what I see now 
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Addison - 27-09-2012 17:29
(27-09-2012 17:02 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Moaner addison no I'd called it honesty, for me not to tell it as it is would be doing myself and this forum a disservice. I know that a lot of the models read this page but why should that then make me change my opnions because of fear of a backlash [...] I've praised this channel in the past and now I'm saying on record here that this channel is a shadow of it's former self. Also if it was going that good then why was it only 26p a minute to phone last night, looks bloody desperate to me.
Well I've said it before and I'll say it again, SB, if I haven't said it before or if I have. I'll always speak the truth and I'll never shirk from that task trusted to me by the forum mods and by the people of Britain. People have got to understand that there's a difference between opinions and the truth. I'll always stand up for the latter and I'll always work to expose the dishonesty and lies of the former.
I have a duty to decide if what I've said before needs saying again, and I'm prepared to stand by that until such time as it's been established beyond doubt that it either needs to be said again or doesn't. And if it doesn’t, I won’t pass the buck and refuse to say that it doesn’t need saying again. Sometimes it feels as though I'm literally getting older by the minute, and I refuse to allow Ofcom to age me in such a cowardly, underhand way. 
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - Chilly - 27-09-2012 17:33
(27-09-2012 17:19 )Scottishbloke Wrote:(27-09-2012 17:12 )the truth Wrote: comparing the models performances with that of Hannah & Courtney is clearly peoples lust for nudity.
So what's your point exactly, those 2 were outstanding, not only did they get naked, they also got into a lot of erotic positions, for the record I've phoned Courtney a couple of times in the past (back in the day when it was £1.53 a minute to phone)
She even asked me if she could move in with me, to which I replied - obviously yes
Classic fanboy statement is that. I mean, being seduced by a babe who tells you what you want to hear so you'll call her again.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 27-09-2012 17:53
(27-09-2012 17:18 )dan g 27 Wrote: I'm not a financial expert by any means, but isn't having calls cheaper kind of a good thing to help bring in customers.
Wouldn't any person just say to himself oh look 26p a minute for a call thats great value for me and the channel itself would be thinking well with cheaper calls, then its most likely more people would call, as they would want to take advantage of such a deal.
it don't make financial sense in the long run as at 26p a min you need 5 people on the line to keep up with a channel charging £1.50 and when that channel has 1 or 2 listeners on the line their is no way storm will have 15,
so its only going to stop them growing and perpetuate the state of affairs i have gone into in my earlier post
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - The Truth - 27-09-2012 17:53
(27-09-2012 17:19 )Scottishbloke Wrote:(27-09-2012 17:12 )the truth Wrote: comparing the models performances with that of Hannah & Courtney is clearly peoples lust for nudity.
So what's your point exactly, those 2 were outstanding, not only did they get naked, they also got into a lot of erotic positions, for the record I've phoned Courtney a couple of times in the past (back in the day when it was £1.53 a minute to phone)
She even asked me if she could move in with me, to which I replied - obviously yes
I think my point is pretty self explanatory,Hannah & Courtney are no longer there,so expecting others to knock out there style shows is unfair,especially if it involves insulting and or derogatory post.
Yes people can want/espect/hope for what they assume are better shows,but what you seem to want will never be broadcast on any fta/ftv babeshow on a skytv platform.
So in conclusion,your freedom to express your opinions are your democratic right and for me some of your points in and around the forum can be quite valid,but as I've stated insulting post are not the right way to go about things,especially if it hurts individuals,surely you wouldn't tear into a shop assistant if they didn't stock what you were looking to purchase?
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 27-09-2012 18:03
(27-09-2012 17:06 )winsaw Wrote: , i don't mean to be nasty about some of there latest signings but storm needs to ask them themselves could that girl get a job on 66 or RLC and if not then her look is to specialist to ever get the big following and lots of calls that would move this channel forward
At the threat of taking your comment out of context winsaw, judging by some the signings 66 have made (& dumped) recently, I wouldn't hold them up as standard bearers anymore
Some of the Storm girls compare favourably with them.Nothing wrong, in my opinion, with having babes with a different look to the rest. Not everyone likes the Nuts/Zoo type of girls 66 have plenty of. Ashleigh Doll built up a good following on Club Bob.
Agree about the picture quality though, it seriously undermines the babes & channel at the moment. As I said before they may have unavoidable reasons for it. And the OSGs too, gone from having the best to one of the worst looking ones.
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - winsaw - 27-09-2012 18:14
^^^i to have no problem with girls with a different look but the problem with storm at the moment seams to be that they are not making enough money, now one of the easiest was to up the revenue would be to go out and sigh 4-5 well known girls with a mainstream look who they could charge £1.50 for,
there are always girls on the channels who are not happy with something or the outer and who think the grass is greener on an outer channel so it would not be to hard to do
i feel its time for storm to speculate to accumulate
RE: Storm - Chat & Discussion - KerrAvon - 27-09-2012 18:30
(27-09-2012 18:14 )winsaw Wrote: ^^^i to have no problem with girls with a different look but the problem with storm at the moment seams to be that they are not making enough money, now one of the easiest was to up the revenue would be to go out and sigh 4-5 well known girls with a mainstream look who they could charge £1.50 for,
there are always girls on the channels who are not happy with something or the outer and who think the grass is greener on an outer channel so it would not be to hard to do
i feel its time for storm to speculate to accumulate
Well Jemma Jey was one such signing, she was pumping out some great shows prior to her enforced break. Hopefully she'll be back (but with the picture quality she deserves)