RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 30-10-2014 13:48
(30-10-2014 05:13 )marlowe Wrote: (29-10-2014 17:01 )stemmata Wrote: I agree, however she has been on the unleashed screens.....where she belongs.
Meaning that Beth isn't good enough for TV?
Good point. The pay is less on Unleashed, so it could be taken as an insult to suggest that she belongs there.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - stemmata - 30-10-2014 13:54
(30-10-2014 13:48 )BarrieBF Wrote: (30-10-2014 05:13 )marlowe Wrote: (29-10-2014 17:01 )stemmata Wrote: I agree, however she has been on the unleashed screens.....where she belongs.
Meaning that Beth isn't good enough for TV?
Good point. The pay is less on Unleashed, so it could be taken as an insult to suggest that she belongs there.
No insult intended. And who knows what "her" contract says concerning unleashed appearances.
She "belongs" there is a compliment on my part. I like her naked and legs apart.......................aint getting that on freeview.

S.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 30-10-2014 14:00
(29-10-2014 22:56 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Amanda Rendall is my guess
It's a bad guess.
The last association between Amanda and Babestation didn't end well, so a repeat isn't on the agenda for either of them.
Amanda's Shebang TV is also competing against BabestationX, so Babestation wouldn't want to give her publicity anyway.
Besides, I think we all know who it is because she's more or less told us. You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to figure it out.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 30-10-2014 14:05
(30-10-2014 13:54 )stemmata Wrote: And who knows what "her" contract says concerning unleashed appearances.
Who knows indeed, but today is her last appearance on Unleashed for 3 weeks.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 30-10-2014 17:38
All this conjecture about who gets paid what for each type of show is just hot air, no one on here knows what any of the girls earns, it's just their own opinion. And opinions are like arseholes, everyone has got one.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 30-10-2014 17:54
(30-10-2014 00:38 )Joey 27 Wrote: Preeti is looking great these days though i have to admit and she has done some good 2-4-1s, a shame about her diva like attitude on twitter
The diva attitude generally is one I would level against many babes across the channels. Not just on Twitter but on the phone too. There are some whose attitude towards the callers leaves a lot to be desired imo .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - marlowe - 31-10-2014 05:29
(30-10-2014 17:38 )Tractor boy Wrote: All this conjecture about who gets paid what for each type of show is just hot air
It's not conjecture and it's not hot air. Many girls have stated that webshow work doesn't pay as well as TV work. Take French Chloe as just one example. When she was working on Sex Station she was always saying that nobody would give her a TV job and she was confined to lesser paying webshow work. There are also examples of TV girls who have declined webshow work when offered it because they didn't feel it paid well enough.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Doddle - 31-10-2014 08:05
(30-10-2014 13:07 )bytor Wrote: (30-10-2014 12:01 )KerrAvon Wrote: (30-10-2014 08:04 )Doddle Wrote: It's never just about being on all the time (no-one slags Tindra as an xpanded usual suspect, for example ). Caty, Beth or Ashley Emma don't get the vitriol that Lori, Preeti or Jada get from similar frequency of appearance. Nor do they deserve to 
Lori divides opinion on here, that much is obvious, but I don't really hear the problem with the likes of Preeti or especially Jada other than being 'usual suspects'. I personally think all three do try & give performances that approach what these shows are meant to be about. If it's not just about being a 'usual suspect', why do they deserve vitriol more than the newer frequent ones? I just see them doing their job very competently.
Very true. Think it's also that a few express their dissatisfaction which they are entitled to but then take offence when others are perceived to defend those girls. Their assumption being they speak for the majority of callers. All it boils down to is that individuals will always have their own agenda based on what they do or don't like. As for the channels and girls they couldn't care less what anyone thinks so long as the money keeps on coming in...which it will so long as evolution dictates the male of the species will be ruled by his erect cock ☺
In fairness, I don't particularly rate Beth, but even I can tell the difference between her shows and the "usual three"
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lacey_fan - 31-10-2014 14:21
99.99% sure the boobs are Lily Roma. Also on Lilys RLC thread someone posted a message from her twitter that she will be appearing on TV on Saturday.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lacey_fan - 31-10-2014 14:24
Just saw this
![[Image: OM6S1tZ.png]](http://i.imgur.com/OM6S1tZ.png)
I'm looking forward to Maddie, Caty and Jada. Looks like Preeti's outfit will be a surprise.
|