RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 01-12-2014 00:23
Thought that was about to be a 3-4-1 there for a moment on BS1
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - darren73 - 01-12-2014 16:37
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lacey_fan - 02-12-2014 13:00
I've seen people comment about how babes deserve more time on BS1 or if new babes are joining people say 'will she get BS1 time?'. I understand that one of BS channels has a dutch licence which allows for more interactive 2-4-1's. But 'individually' what does it matter which channel a babe is on, they can still get naked across all 3 channels. Sophie Parker gets plenty of BS Blue time and she has been amazing whenever she is scheduled on. So if someone could clarify why some babes should get solo time on BS1 specifically it would be much appreciated.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - TheProf - 02-12-2014 16:21
My understanding of the situation (which may be wrong of course!) is that the Dutch Licence gives the BS1 channel a 'little' more leeway on simulation of sex acts. Note that displaying pussies is still not allowed, but they can, for example, pretend to masturbate more realistically, and be more intimate (Kissing, caressing, licking, sucking nipples etc.) in 2-4-1's than is allowed by UK's OFCOM.
With this in mind, fans like myself often expect that certain girls would push right to the limits with their performances if they appeared on BS1.
I am sure you recognise that some babes are way more adventurous than others, and it is natural that we would want them to appear on the channel with the most scope. (albeit a very small improvement on the regular channels).
At the end of the day, we have to recognise that the 'Babeshows' are classified as advertising displays - advertising telephone services. They are not TV sexual entertainment shows, and are subject to the whims of whichever regulator applies. Booooo!!!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 02-12-2014 16:50
Also with bs blue the girls are often on three at a time giving them no room to get into interesting positions. On bs1 they have more scope with which to entertain.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 02-12-2014 21:57
^ I'd agree with TB - putting aside whether a babe can be more risqué on BS1 (assuming she wants to, which not all of them seem to) I think another common gripe is that if a babe is not on BS1 then they have less chance of being on the screen solo and are more likely to be sharing a set.
(Although it can depend on who is on the roster and the total number of babes on shift on any particular night : there can often be decent stints of solo time on "Xtra".)
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 02-12-2014 21:59
(01-12-2014 16:37 )darren73 Wrote:
Well it will do if Delia gets the BS1 airtime
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - forumdude - 02-12-2014 22:49
Girl Girl pussy fingering before 11pm
Gotta love babestation
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - DB83 - 04-12-2014 00:29
BS already have too many girls for the available slots. Their new 'Starlets' channel lasted not long and rather than put different girls on to that they dual-cast from another channel.
But if new girls come in the expectation of a certain level of employment, in the short-term that may happen. In the long term there, like others, is a pecking order so some girls are always on which reduces the opportunities for the rest.
My gut feeling is that we will see some departees go back to their previous employ.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ultra07 - 04-12-2014 08:15
Far far too many girls for the channels they have
Some of favourites used to be on 2 maybe 3 times a week, now girls mentioning they have been given a "week off" or only 1 shift a week
Not good enough , and has been said I can also see certain girls go back to their previous channels
|