+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138)
+---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394
RE: Ofcom Discussion - LODOS - 02-05-2012 20:04
(02-05-2012 20:03 )rj242 Wrote:(02-05-2012 19:57 )cmiller Wrote: why read a thread that is so "utterly pointless"? people aren't going to stop posting on this thread, no matter what you say. practice what you preach, mate
But I am! Honestly this thread amuses me. Some people simply refuse to stare facts in the face.
Are you one of those people that complain about a tv show but still watch it?
RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 02-05-2012 20:05
(02-05-2012 19:58 )rj242 Wrote: Out of interest who on this forum would be prepared to risk their money and their business to 'stand up to Ofcom'? Its one thing to demand that someone else risks it all but quite another to risk it all yourself.
Well if I was running a babe channel or any kind of business that was subject to harrassment I bloody would. They are more likely to risk losing their money paying out constant fines by doing sweet fuck all to answer your question. Also even with the tameness that currently exists Ofcom will still find a reason to fine or place sanctions on a channel as they tend to make up and over exaggerate the so-called content that was of apparent offence, for anybody to think otherwise is clearly deluded
RE: Ofcom Discussion - rj242 - 02-05-2012 20:08
(02-05-2012 20:04 )LODOS Wrote: Are you one of those people that complain about a tv show but still watch it?
Me? I'm not complaining - everyone else is which I find amusing.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - LODOS - 02-05-2012 20:11
(02-05-2012 20:08 )rj242 Wrote:(02-05-2012 20:04 )LODOS Wrote: Are you one of those people that complain about a tv show but still watch it?
Me? I'm not complaining - everyone else is which I find amusing.
but your complaining about people complaining and discussing ofcom but your reading and posting in this thread
RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 02-05-2012 20:13
This is about the freedom to watch what we, when we want. A lot of people are sick of people complaining to Ofcom and are sick of Ofcom dictating what we should be watching
RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 02-05-2012 20:13
(02-05-2012 19:58 )rj242 Wrote: Out of interest who on this forum would be prepared to risk their money and their business to 'stand up to Ofcom'? Its one thing to demand that someone else risks it all but quite another to risk it all yourself.
Well, it may very well be all talk, but I understand that at least one of the babe channels is taking on Ofcom.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - rj242 - 02-05-2012 20:14
(02-05-2012 20:05 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Well if I was running a babe channel or any kind of business that was subject to harrassment I bloody would. They are more likely to risk losing their money paying out constant fines by doing sweet fuck all to answer your question. Also even with the tameness that currently exists Ofcom will still find a reason to fine or place sanctions on a channel as they tend to make up and over exaggerate the so-called content that was of apparent offence, for anybody to think otherwise is clearly deluded
Which of the channels have suffered these massive money losing fines recently? Do you have any idea the cost of legal action or the length of time it would take? Have you even considered that even if you won there would be a huge backlash by the moral majority demanding the government change the law? You strike me as idealistic but very unrealistic.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - dan g 27 - 02-05-2012 20:15
(02-05-2012 20:13 )StanTheMan Wrote:Which babechannel is it?(02-05-2012 19:58 )rj242 Wrote: Out of interest who on this forum would be prepared to risk their money and their business to 'stand up to Ofcom'? Its one thing to demand that someone else risks it all but quite another to risk it all yourself.
Well, it may very well be all talk, but I understand that at least one of the babe channels is taking on Ofcom.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - rj242 - 02-05-2012 20:17
(02-05-2012 20:11 )LODOS Wrote: but your complaining about people complaining and discussing ofcom but your reading and posting in this thread
I am merely pointing out the futility of complaining about Ofcom.
RE: Ofcom Discussion - rj242 - 02-05-2012 20:19
(02-05-2012 20:13 )StanTheMan Wrote: Well, it may very well be all talk, but I understand that at least one of the babe channels is taking on Ofcom.
Define taking on - what exactly do they hope to achieve?