+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation Xtra (/forumdisplay.php?fid=150)
+--- Thread: Babestation Xtreme - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=17684)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281
Honesty would be the best policy - nailpouchofmine - 28-12-2010 21:06
Why does`nt some one in authority,from Babestation just write to our forum [I know they read it] and explain to us why they have suddenly gone all softy softy with the encrypted channel even though they are advertising it as hardcore?
I am making a challenge now and I am hoping for a bona fida explanation,as in my opinion they are at this moment committing suicide by not explaining what is going on!
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - prince henry sinclair - 28-12-2010 21:26
I think we all know perfectly well what the problem is. You only have to read certain other parts of this forum.
RE: Honesty would be the best policy - m100 - 28-12-2010 22:09
(28-12-2010 21:06 )nailpouchofmine Wrote: Why does`nt some one in authority,from Babestation just write to our forum [I know they read it] and explain to us why they have suddenly gone all softy softy with the encrypted channel even though they are advertising it as hardcore?
I am making a challenge now and I am hoping for a bona fida explanation,as in my opinion they are at this moment committing suicide by not explaining what is going on!
A great point but the simple fact is there are a sufficient number of people out there willing to pay for the watered sown version which is now showing. I've paid for extreme around 20 times - 99% of the time it's been live show days - most of them were good and much of their own produced films were good as well but the 'bought in' stuff was always poor and now the live shows have gone down to that level as well so I won't be paying again. I recorded them all so basically I've got all the content that was worth seeing.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - deltic - 28-12-2010 22:18
against better judgment watched last night ,only because it was Reede, and saw less than half dozen pussy shots. £1 a shot. worth it? dont think so. pretty sure Camilla and Lolly's recording had been edited as well.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - aaron - 28-12-2010 22:34
It does seem that they are being over cautious at the moment rather than merely cautious.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - MrRude - 29-12-2010 01:24
Thanks for the heads up guys.
if i hadn't have been busy doing something else i probably wouldn't have been able to resist purchasing this show cos i'm a reede fan and carmen is right up my street.
I really do want to believe in this channel as i've said before because the content in it's previous form was perfect for me.
However,
I'd still love to watch the girls on the phones like on the other babestation channels but nude and straight to camera.
With no touching of the genitals but lots of pussy on show and maybe just as a guess £3 a night i reckon it'd make good money.
Fuck all this talk of hardcore...we can all get bucketloads these days..i work with the stuff all day thats why i'm not really that interested in it.
It's these particular girls i wanna see
There must also be other ideas that can be explored..what about during shows other alternate cameras...on another channel...the option to watch camilla, leah and lolly's nude show with a couple of extra camera angles mixed in for £3 a night??
An actual more explicit version of babestation or babestation extreme??
Not sure she'd be up for it...but who wouldn't pay £3 for a nice view of tiffany from behind right now?? we know tiffany isn't adverse to showing her pussy anyway even if she doesn't want to do any form of sex even girl/girl so you could get more girls open to it.
Anyone else got any ideas of other ideas that can be explored to give us content we would want to see and that could be broadcast??
Cheers,
MrRude
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - Count Spankula - 29-12-2010 09:48
(29-12-2010 01:24 )MrRude Wrote: what about during shows other alternate cameras...on another channel...the option to watch camilla, leah and lolly's nude show with a couple of extra camera angles mixed in for £3 a night??
An interesting idea, but I'm not sure that it would work too well in practice. Unless the girl was performing to the alternate cameras I'm not sure that people would be willing to pay just to watch, and she couldn't really do that and be facing the main camera at the same time. I don't think you'd get enough of an audience to make it work.
[split] Who's on Babestation or Glamour Chase tonight? - frankiemania - 29-12-2010 22:33
babestation extreme is crap.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - vila - 30-12-2010 01:26
(28-12-2010 21:26 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: I think we all know perfectly well what the problem is. You only have to read certain other parts of this forum.
If you knpw of material on the forum which is relevant, why not say what it is?
If you mean the Bang Babes saga, it's totally irrelevant. BB was free-to-air, BSXtreme is encrypted.
RE: Babestation XTREME discussion - blackjaques - 30-12-2010 07:09
(30-12-2010 01:26 )vila Wrote:(28-12-2010 21:26 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: I think we all know perfectly well what the problem is. You only have to read certain other parts of this forum.
If you knpw of material on the forum which is relevant, why not say what it is?
If you mean the Bang Babes saga, it's totally irrelevant. BB was free-to-air, BSXtreme is encrypted.
I think that Ofcon also warned Babestation that their "Extreme" channel was too explicit, hence they had to tone it down.
Ofcon have done this before with other subscription channels.