(18-10-2009 20:25 )Hexit Wrote:  saying its the produces fault dosent wash im afraid. the girls know what the job entails, encourge joe blogs to call by putting on enough of a show to make him want to but not so much he dosent have to.
so unless the producer is intent on closing the channel down they will do whatever it takes to get calls as long as they stick to the rules.
so no i doupt its the producers,.
it seems like the girls have to much say in the show from what i see, and there contracts must be very loosley worded for them to have such a huge difference in level of performance without the other girls kicking up a stink.

(19-10-2009 02:46 )oxygenIT Wrote:  Was just watching the Kelly & Amanda 2-4-1. They both clearly wanted to go a bit further trying a bit of kissing and nipple licking but as usual BS bottled it with the usual (quick cutaways etc) and when Kelly started rubbing her boobs in Amanda's face and Amanda grabbed them to have a little nipple action they cut to a the £3-a-pop picture advertisement and took Kelly off the bed.

Disappointing because the girls were clearly happy to go a little further and at first it looked like they might let them only to bottle it.

(19-10-2009 05:57 )Hexit Wrote:  m8 your taking my comment out of context.

ofcoms rules (if you can be botherd... http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?activeTextDocId=2771854 ) are much more lax than the rules that cellcast are implimenting (if they wernt then a lot of other babechannels are in deep water as we speak). the bbc who supply the licence also have a say and they only asked that there be no genital stimulation, prolonged shots of genitals and no direct views of genitals. at the moment ofcom are more concerned with the inshow adverts rather than the onscreen content of all the channels.

the reason in my opinion, they have tamed down is so that girls like paige and other day girls who had a fanbase on freeview via partypeople, will do nights. also new girls like jessica who hit the ground running are hard to come by and keep.
this is what i ment when i said, it seems like some of the girls are dictating how the show is produced.

thoughs that have sky will confirm that b4 paige, lori and lynesy were hired for nights, babestation/party girls was just as explicite as any other channel on sky even on freeview when there was just partygirls. (sighting the least couple of months of party girls on freeview b4 they went off air and came back. ie: there test run).

this is why im less inclined to blame the producers at this point.

im postin this link to a recent adjudication by ofcom agains bangbabes http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb137/ you will see that ofcoms only reason why they held them in breach is that the offence was committed b4 10pm. the way its worded is thit if it happend after 10 they wouldnt have botherd ruling in favour of the breach.

(19-10-2009 00:33 )rusty legrand Wrote:  Paige was excellent yesterday and again today. (She has shown her nipples a load of times).