RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lazercutgold - 21-12-2014 17:00
Hd cameras please lol or new onees
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 21-12-2014 17:49
(21-12-2014 13:43 )davetherave57 Wrote: ^^Leigh & Beth are the new Morecambe & Wise... Beths even wearing Erics old glasses..... bring me sunshine
Didn't one of them have short fat hairy legs.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - davetherave57 - 21-12-2014 22:46
(21-12-2014 17:49 )Charlemagne Wrote: (21-12-2014 13:43 )davetherave57 Wrote: ^^Leigh & Beth are the new Morecambe & Wise... Beths even wearing Erics old glasses..... bring me sunshine
Didn't one of them have short fat hairy legs.
Yes........Leigh Wise Does
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 21-12-2014 23:42
OK, moving on from the burning questions of the moment to the mere idle speculation :
what's with the new sofa position in the boudoir set ?
Now we need a telescope to see the babes as they're forced to stand right at the back ?
There are just no positives to this situation that I can see...er.....oh...
...OK, maybe that actually works, but I still need convincing, say a good long session of Preeti doing this knickerless
Seriously I don't think it's very smart - it doesn't allow for 2-4-1s and will restrict the range of poses/movements possible generally ?
Is it intended to keep the babes on their feet ? No lying down on the job ?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 21-12-2014 23:44
Was Cali wearing heels in that picture, can't believe she's that much taller than Ashley?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 21-12-2014 23:50
(21-12-2014 23:44 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: Was Cali wearing heels in that picture, can't believe she's that much taller than Ashley?
Honestly don't know - couldn't see her feet at all, they were always out of the frame.
Guess she must have been, either that or the set is slightly raised up or something in the corner.
Ashley does also look as if she's slightly leaning back/ "sitting" against the wall/that picture frame, so maybe that's also exaggerating the height difference.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 22-12-2014 01:41
^ Cali has these on now...
...so if she was also wearing them earlier that probably answers the question.
EDIT : or then again, maybe not, just checked my earlier caps and found this...
This one suggests Cali was just in her stocking feet after all, no heels ? Maybe Ashley is tiny ?
Good to see Cali back and with a set to herself now but unfortunately she seems to be doing a domination show now which is not my cup of tea really.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - HannahsPet - 22-12-2014 01:49
(21-12-2014 17:00 )lazercutgold Wrote: Hd cameras please lol or new onees
Guessing all cameras they have are hd ones prob is when the pictures are converted
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 22-12-2014 02:48
OK sorry to harp on about "sofa-gate" but I see now both Cali and Ashley have been using that set and sitting on a stool right against the back wall. WTF is the point of that when there's a bloody great sofa already on the set taking up most of the space ?
So the range of movement is zero and the camera set up is consequently pretty boringly static, to avoid showing bits of the sofa in the foreground obscuring the babe.
OK - Cali's stint was supposedly one of these domination things, but Ashley's shift that's now following doesn't look like it is.
Is there something wrong with the sofa ? - has it been pushed against the wall as a temporary act of disablement : has an enthusiastically bouncing Lori or a contortingly oily Jada runined its structure and/or covers? Has there been some calamitous spillage of oil or other liquids that's rendered it unusable ?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - bob roberts - 22-12-2014 07:55
(22-12-2014 02:48 )M-L-L Wrote: OK sorry to harp on about "sofa-gate" but I see now both Cali and Ashley have been using that set and sitting on a stool right against the back wall. WTF is the point of that when there's a bloody great sofa already on the set taking up most of the space ?
So the range of movement is zero and the camera set up is consequently pretty boringly static, to avoid showing bits of the sofa in the foreground obscuring the babe.
OK - Cali's stint was supposedly one of these domination things, but Ashley's shift that's now following doesn't look like it is.
Is there something wrong with the sofa ? - has it been pushed against the wall as a temporary act of disablement : has an enthusiastically bouncing Lori or a contortingly oily Jada runined its structure and/or covers? Has there been some calamitous spillage of oil or other liquids that's rendered it unusable ?
You've chosen the two most inert/unimaginative performers. Not the sofa's fault.
|