+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Forum: News Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111)
+---- Thread: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (/showthread.php?tid=59612)
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - admiral decker - 17-03-2014 21:00
(17-03-2014 12:47 )southlondonphil Wrote: If you want to fly a plane into a target you hijack it and do the job immediately before anyone has a chance to comprehend what's happening. You don't land and wait because then everyone is on the look out for you.
It's possible that the plane is being given a remote control refit. That would inevitably take time.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - CIA Snooper - 17-03-2014 21:22
(17-03-2014 20:50 )HannahsPet Wrote: would love to know if its possible to clone another aircrafts transponder data for one thats already in the air
The way to do it is to shadow another aircraft. In this case another Boeing 777 was immediately in front of MH370 as it reached the Andaman Sea. This was flight SIA86 en-route from Singapore flying across the Andaman Sea into the Bay of Bengal and then across India, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkmenistan before heading across Europe to its destination of Barcelona. MH370 likely flew in the shadow of SIA68 through India and Afghanistan airspace. As MH370 was flying “dark” without transponder it would have shown up as one single blip on radar with only the transponder information of SIA68 showing up on the Indian and Afghan radar screens.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - marlowe - 17-03-2014 21:44
I see some good points being made, but it still looks to me as though a pilot gone crazy is the simplest theory.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - CIA Snooper - 17-03-2014 21:54
(17-03-2014 17:33 )Lord Rockingham Wrote: Is it definite that they even had enough fuel to reach Iran?
It's not definite, but it's theoretically possible that MH370 could have reached eastern Iran.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - tony confederate - 17-03-2014 22:19
(17-03-2014 21:44 )marlowe Wrote: a pilot gone crazy is the simplest theory.
Is it so simple though? A pilot gone crazy means suicide, but then why head to the Indian Ocean to do it? Why fly around for 8 hours or so? Even if it is the simplest theory, I'm not sure that it makes any real sense. It would have to be the most elaborate suicide in history.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - kevin symons - 17-03-2014 22:30
(17-03-2014 22:19 )tony confederate Wrote: why head to the Indian Ocean
Yes why go to the Indian Ocean just to commit suicide, that's the part I don't get at all. If that's where the plane finished up.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - Glenn Miller - 17-03-2014 22:46
(17-03-2014 16:10 )babelover48 Wrote: If the Taliban were behind the hijack as reported
That theory is certainly being taken seriously, as Malaysia has formally asked Afghanistan and Pakistan for permission to fly over Taliban bases in their countries.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - Colonel Bogey - 17-03-2014 23:14
(17-03-2014 22:30 )kevin symons Wrote: Yes why go to the Indian Ocean
The plane flying to the Indian Ocean and ditching there when its fuel ran out may not have been the plan. Perhaps one of the pilots or whoever the hijacker was had the intention of crashing into a landmark in Kuala Lumpur in a 9/11 style attack. The Petronas Twin Towers springs to mind. Reading some of the earlier posts in this thread suggests possible reasons as to why the pilot may have wanted to do this. Hence the turn back to overfly Malaysia with the intention of approaching Kuala Lumpur below radar level via the low level countryside from the Malacca Strait side of Malaysia. That route would leave little chance of the plane being stopped from reaching its target and it could have been one of the scenarios that the pilot had been practicing on his simulator. Why on earth otherwise would the pilot have turned the flight back to overfly Malaysia again if the motive was nothing more than to commit suicide in the Indian Ocean? Think about it for a moment. If the pilot did want to commit an act of terrorism what is the first target that comes to mind? Definitely the Petronas Twin Towers because of the smilarity to 9/11! The point I am getting at is that the plan may have been thwarted over the Malacca Strait. We could speculate on how that happened, crew and/or passengers fighting back somehow and resulting in a forced entry to the cockpit for example, but whatever happened it resulted in the plane being left unmanned with nobody alive to fly it. The plane would then have continued to fly out into the Indian Ocean, running as a ghost plane until it ran out of fuel.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - Tumble_Drier - 17-03-2014 23:28
(17-03-2014 22:46 )Glenn Miller Wrote:(17-03-2014 16:10 )babelover48 Wrote: If the Taliban were behind the hijack as reported
That theory is certainly being taken seriously, as Malaysia has formally asked Afghanistan and Pakistan for permission to fly over Taliban bases in their countries.
I can't see why Malaysia would need to ask. The Americans are involved in the search and I would expect they have suitable toys for that job.
The plane is either at the bottom of the sea or crashed in a remote area, probably the former rather than the latter.
What caused it to end up there is another matter.
RE: News around the World - Chat and Discussion - Tractor boy - 18-03-2014 00:02
It seems a serious design flaw that the tracking device can be switched off in the cockpit.
Surely it should only be accessible to engineers when the plane is being serviced