Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - oldboy1047 - 08-05-2012 08:56 the problem is if ofcom relaxed the rules completely a lot of our fav girls would no longer want to work on these channels and we would only have the porn girls that we can see on plenty of websites now.i would just like to see the rules relaxed back to 2010 when we had the occasional slip.it was the anticipation of waiting just in case,whereas now we know there is no chance RE: Ofcom Discussion - shankey! - 08-05-2012 09:03 (08-05-2012 08:56 )oldboy1047 Wrote: the problem is if ofcom relaxed the rules completely a lot of our fav girls would no longer want to work on these channels and we would only have the porn girls that we can see on plenty of websites now.i would just like to see the rules relaxed back to 2010 when we had the occasional slip.it was the anticipation of waiting just in case,whereas now we know there is no chance thats not entirely true, b/s extreme has models on it that dont go the whole hog, lori for one ,a mix of both x rated and soft core would be the answer to everyones prayers, if only RE: Ofcom Discussion - Rammyrascal - 08-05-2012 09:09 (08-05-2012 08:56 )oldboy1047 Wrote: the problem is if ofcom relaxed the rules completely a lot of our fav girls would no longer want to work on these channels and we would only have the porn girls that we can see on plenty of websites now.i would just like to see the rules relaxed back to 2010 when we had the occasional slip.it was the anticipation of waiting just in case,whereas now we know there is no chance that's how i want the babeshow rules to be, back to how they were in 2010 when the babeshows were at their best RE: Ofcom Discussion - cmiller - 08-05-2012 09:59 i'm not asking to see pussy, just what film and mainstream tv can show. from what i've seen of 2010, they had it spot on. no pussy, no sex, but anything else goes RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 08-05-2012 16:45 A bit off topic, but here is a latest Ofcom investigation that I came across on Google, regarding the new film Prometheus. Ofcom wastes so much time on non issues http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/may/08/channel-4-ofcom-investigation-prometheus-exlusive Did a studio exec reach through the TV, strangle someone and force them to buy a ticket? NO!!! Just another example of Ofcom assuming the people of England aren't capable of thinking for themselves RE: Ofcom Discussion - StanTheMan - 08-05-2012 22:49 (08-05-2012 09:09 )Rammyrascal Wrote: that's how i want the babeshow rules to be, back to how they were in 2010 when the babeshows were at their best 2010? You'd have to go back further than that for them to be back at their best in my opinion. RE: Ofcom Discussion - Scottishbloke - 08-05-2012 23:01 Yes I'd agree try 2006 when we had babestar tv and sexstation tv both FTA showing full nudity aswell as the use of sex toys night after night, but also agree that 2010 was a very good year, it came a close second in my opinion in terms of the babe shows in their greatness so I'd be more than happy if we could at least see now what we were only 2 years ago, with the exception of Babestation the rest are just too tame now and the rules need relaxing to make them once more enjoyable viewing. RE: Ofcom Discussion - *Kal-El* - 09-05-2012 14:10 And with the Government now set to monitor your Internet thats pretty much it now RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 09-05-2012 16:48 Three words: F**KIN NANNY STATE RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 09-05-2012 20:09 Sexual content is the only area where the limits are different for encrypted and clear content, and the only area where limits differ from DVDs and cinema. Why? Is it uniquely harmful? Uniquely offensive? Of course not. |