+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: Former Babestation babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=261)
+----- Forum: Lolly Badcock (/forumdisplay.php?fid=109)
+----- Thread: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=8794)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 26-11-2013 19:46
Wednesday 27th November -BSCams
![[Image: th_494939561_CropperCapture1_123_28lo.jpg]](http://img235.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=494939561_CropperCapture1_123_28lo.jpg)
No chance of any sleep tomorrow night then
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - Olliee - 26-11-2013 19:51
She's looking amazing currently
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 26-11-2013 19:57
(26-11-2013 19:51 )Olliee Wrote: She's looking amazing currently
So true - tylercoop's comment about "glowing" was spot on.
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - bobbymartino1 - 27-11-2013 01:07
Has anyone had her pictures sent to their cellular?
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 27-11-2013 20:54
(27-11-2013 01:07 )bobbymartino1 Wrote: Has anyone had her pictures sent to their cellular?
A few out of curiosity - hate to say it but I have to be honest they weren't worth it. Some of them she was back to the camera and not even topless. Others where she was topless were quite harshly lit and not very flattering and looked like they were taken with a mobile.
Maybe I just got poor luck of the draw but it's not exactly cheap to keep trying.
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 27-11-2013 20:58
At least you got the right girl...
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - bobbymartino1 - 28-11-2013 16:43
(27-11-2013 20:54 )M-L-L Wrote:(27-11-2013 01:07 )bobbymartino1 Wrote: Has anyone had her pictures sent to their cellular?
A few out of curiosity - hate to say it but I have to be honest they weren't worth it. Some of them she was back to the camera and not even topless. Others where she was topless were quite harshly lit and not very flattering and looked like they were taken with a mobile.
Maybe I just got poor luck of the draw but it's not exactly cheap to keep trying.
Thanks for the info!
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 28-11-2013 23:04
In a probably misguided sense of attempt at "balance", I should add that there may very well be more "professional" looking pictures which are sent out by text message : certainly some of the ones they show in the "wee box" look like the glossier images of her that are in the members area of the BS website ; but again in the further interest of potentially saving you money a lot of these pictures are already floating about the web, none of them I have seen show her more than topless; and there are not actually that many sets of her in the BS website - maybe around 8 different outfits, mostly variations of different coloured bra/stockings combinations, I think a couple of different bikini style outfits in the sauna set, one in "kinky" thigh high boots, that was last time I had access a month or so ago (membership lapsed recently) and most of these seemed to date from 2012.
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 29-11-2013 22:03
"Ready to be a bad girl on the Babestation desk"
RE: Lolly Badcock - Chat & Discussion - 4evadionne - 29-11-2013 22:52
You simply can't beat those award winning statistics! They always add up to sexual perfection. Looking phenomenal in the office
