Europe, Referendum & Brexit (formerly Europe..IN or OUT??) - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114) +---- Forum: News Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=111) +---- Thread: Europe, Referendum & Brexit (formerly Europe..IN or OUT??) (/showthread.php?tid=66189) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 |
RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - lancealot790 - 25-06-2016 14:43 Of course the leave camp would be complaining, saying exactly the same things as the remain camp and presenting a petition to parliament. Nothing is going to change for the next two years so people should just carry on as normal and wait to see what happens in the eurozone before panicking over things that have yet to happen. RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - M-L-L - 25-06-2016 14:56 (25-06-2016 13:08 )circles_o_o_o Wrote:(25-06-2016 12:32 )the downtrodden Wrote: It would be crazy not to have a second referendum, because how can people be held to a vote which took place years before? When the 1975 referendum was held, the UK had only been in the EEC 2 years. The main reason for holding a referendum in 1975 was same as the main reason for holding one now : the PM - in that case a Labour one Harold Wilson - was under huge political pressure from a sizeable chunk of his own party to get out of Europe, the UK had been taken into the EEC by the Conservatives arguably without that really being the subject of an overwhelming mandate of the voters - the 1970 election victory for the Conservatives over Labour was fairly unexpected and the EEC arguably hadn't been the main issue, as ever it was "the economy,stupid". There was no way Conservative PM Heath was going to put the policy to a referendum, being absolutely committed to it; and the Labour Party was split on the issue also. A referendum was seized on by Wilson as the device to get himself off the hook (despite him having refused to endorse it as official Labour policy before then - it having been repeatedly proposed and argued for by his arch-nemesis "loony left" Tony Benn) just as Cameron was trying to do this time around with his own Eurosceptics. Labour had actually opposed entry into the EEC as the legislation was going through Parliament in the early 1970s; arguably purely from an electoral opportunism as the best chance to overturn the government and force another election (Opportunist because this was despite Labour having tried to get the UK into the EEC themselves when in government in the late 60s and being vetoed by the French, as the Tories had also been before in the 50s); and entry into the EEC in 1973 was only passed through the House of Commons by means of a substantial chunk of Labour MPs repeatedly rebelling against their own party's official policy of opposition. Wilson was arguably uncommitted to the EEC for a long time but eventually decided "in" was the lesser of two evils and so in 1975 his tactic was the same as Cameron's : to argue that the terms and conditions of entry had been wrong and needed renegotiation. But this was arguably really only a cover against accusations that he was an opportunist with no principles doing a complete U-turn - having been against EEC entry when in opposition, but then supporting remaining in once back in government. 2 years wasn't really enough time for the UK public to build up any real feeling of antagonism against the EEC, and the powers and remit of it were different in those days than the current EU. The voters arguably also had more of a sense of deference towards politicians and the opinions of "experts". The UK was an economic basket case in the early 1970s and the EEC had been seen since the 1960s by UK political establishment as a possible way of bolstering the faltering performance of the country trade-wise. Tory outcast Enoch Powell was whipping up racial antagonism in his speeches* - to great acclaim of sections of both right and left-wing voters in much the same way as Farage. So nothing's really new ever....probably the timescale until the next referendum will be shorter though *directed towards immigrants from British colonies, rather than Continental Europe; but same difference really. Racism isn't to do with skin colour - it's an emotional response based primarily on fear and is really to do with tribalism and fear of the "unlike" in many different ways ? RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - lovebabes56 - 25-06-2016 15:07 Petition for 2nd referendum now has close t 2m signatures it will be debated in Parliament but it doesn't mean that they will call one wonder how may times CW signed it? I noticed votes were cast in Gibraltar what would happen to their status in Europe? RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - Charlemagne - 25-06-2016 15:10 Britain want to trigger the exit clause in the autumn but a lot of the other EU leaders are pushing for talks to begin as once. European Union leaders want to shore up the bloc and prevent a contagion of copy-cat referendums pulling it apart. RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - lovebabes56 - 25-06-2016 15:15 I would say fuck 'em make them wait - this will done on our terms not theirs...they have shafted us enough over the years RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - Matt77 - 25-06-2016 15:17 It might not just be disappointed Remainers who will want a second referendum in due course. Just listen to, and read about, the speed at which the promises of the Leave campaign are unravelling:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p03zfw9m http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jun/25/leave-campaign-rows-back-key-pledges-immigration-nhs-spending RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - lovebabes56 - 25-06-2016 15:21 typical of any political campaigners - once they win they cannot guarantee anything they pledged - maybe it is time we took back control of the country from our own MP'S!! Referendum riots anyone? RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - Scots Napoleon - 25-06-2016 15:25 (25-06-2016 11:59 )Censorship :-( Wrote: The Scottish Parliament is a devolved Parliament, and can only legislate for areas that are not 'reserved'; Westminster retains power in respect of these (many) reserved issues, such as defence, international relations etc. You're absolutely right - in theory anyway. The more interesting question is would a British Prime Minister try to block Scotland from going its own way? Surely that would eventually prove to be a vain attempt to shore up the Union and leave the Prime Minister with an embarrassing failure on his hands? A major clash between the Scottish and UK governments and the UK government eventually backing down? A 62% Remain vote in Scotland is a decisive margin is it not? RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - Matt77 - 25-06-2016 15:26 (25-06-2016 15:15 )babelover48 Wrote: I would say fuck 'em make them wait - this will done on our terms not theirs...they have shafted us enough over the years UK vs 27 EU States - this will done on our terms? Wake up for God's sake. We used to extract deals and rebates in our favour because we often used our veto or threatened to walk but now we've voted to leave completely and have no cards to play. RE: Europe..IN or OUT?? - wackawoo - 25-06-2016 15:31 (25-06-2016 15:17 )Matt77 Wrote: It might not just be disappointed Remainers who will want a second referendum in due course. Just listen to, and read about, the speed at which the promises of the Leave campaign are unravelling:- I'm actually swaying now to it being an ok idea, at least give it a go, I think poeple have been scared byt he markets and pound collapsing, the remain people can jump on this. |