The UK Babe Channels Forum
Paige - Discussion Thread - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Babestation (/forumdisplay.php?fid=99)
+---- Forum: Babestation fanzone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+----- Forum: Paige Tyler (/forumdisplay.php?fid=119)
+----- Thread: Paige - Discussion Thread (/showthread.php?tid=7449)



RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - samcooke - 05-11-2009 02:41

Should have gone to Specsavers....

.... i'll get my coat.


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - bytor - 05-11-2009 07:42

My comments were made jokingly but I really do mean it when I say I do not care what she wears as I simply just like seeing Paige on screen, whether that be with or without stockings, basques or glasses or whatever.
That said I do not think having a thing for glasses puts you in line with those who like feet or balloon busting! That is just not rightSmile


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - lawndogs78 - 06-11-2009 11:24

finally got her tits out. . worth the wait? ummmm no


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - bytor - 06-11-2009 13:08

(06-11-2009 11:24 )lawndogs78 Wrote:  finally got her tits out. . worth the wait? ummmm no
Well you should not have waited then. Just press those numbers on the remote and change channel.


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - HEX!T - 06-11-2009 13:30

he's rite it realy wasnt worth the wait, as she should have hit the ground running like jessica. she opend herself up to an awfull lot of critacism for the way she hyped herself.
some fair some not so. but im glad she finaly stoped playing hard to get and is delivering on her potential now...


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - Rise - 07-11-2009 02:21

What's that rumbling sound?

It's the Paige Posse getting restless waiting for her next appearance!


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - lawndogs78 - 07-11-2009 15:51

my point was just if you hold anything back in life then when you eventually do usually people will say tht was so not worth the wait. she mite be great on phones but as a person she seems lil up herself and the whole not getting tits out while bein on an adult show only enforced tht in my mind.

before peeps say shes entitled to not get them out yes she is if she works in woolies but not on a phone sex show.


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - bytor - 07-11-2009 16:36

(07-11-2009 15:51 )lawndogs78 Wrote:  my point was just if you hold anything back in life then when you eventually do usually people will say tht was so not worth the wait. she mite be great on phones but as a person she seems lil up herself and the whole not getting tits out while bein on an adult show only enforced tht in my mind.

before peeps say shes entitled to not get them out yes she is if she works in woolies but not on a phone sex show.

You state it was not worth the wait?? Surely that is just your opinion (and yes you are entitled to that). My opinion is that it was worth the wait and have enjoyed what I see regardless. I presume you have never spoken with Paige because if you had then you would know she is not up herself-very far from it. She has a great sense of humour, very friendly (especially when she gets to know you) and is at ease with her callers as are most of the girls.


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - elgar1uk - 07-11-2009 16:39

(07-11-2009 15:51 )lawndogs78 Wrote:  before peeps say shes entitled to not get them out yes she is if she works in woolies but not on a phone sex show.

What you say is completely wrong because none of the channels guarantee topless shows and they can show what they like.


RE: Paige - Nights: Discussion Thread - mikedafc - 07-11-2009 18:24

Elgar- if you are on an 18 rated show then yes you are expected to go topless!! If you want proof just flick through all of the other channels in the 900 section of the Sky EPG after 10pm and you will see that for yourself. In regards to her taking 5 months to get fully topless, can you think of any other girl on any other of the channels that has ever been given that amount of leeway!!


(07-11-2009 16:39 )elgar1uk Wrote:  
(07-11-2009 15:51 )lawndogs78 Wrote:  before peeps say shes entitled to not get them out yes she is if she works in woolies but not on a phone sex show.

What you say is completely wrong because none of the channels guarantee topless shows and they can show what they like.