+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Forum: All Other Subjects (/forumdisplay.php?fid=114)
+---- Forum: Sports Zone (/forumdisplay.php?fid=77)
+----- Forum: Cricket (/forumdisplay.php?fid=215)
+----- Thread: Cricket Banter (/showthread.php?tid=31128)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 07-10-2022 15:41
Australia v West Indies 1stT20I Brisbane
West Indies elected to field
AUS 178-7 Warner 78 David 42 Joseph 3-21 McCoy 2-33
WI 147-8 Charles 29 Hosien 25 King 23 Starc 4-20 Cummins 2-32
Australia won by 31 runs
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 09-10-2022 06:38
Australia v England 1st T20I Perth (09.10 BST)
Australia elected to field
ENG 208-6 (20 overs) Hales 84 Buttler 68 Ellis 3-20
AUS 200-9 (20 overs) Warner 73 Marsh 36 Stoinis 35 Wade 21 Wood 3-34 S Curran 2-35 Topley 2-36
England won by 8 runs
RE: Cricket Banter - Snooks - 09-10-2022 18:55
Both innings faded with time.
England could and probably should have posted a completely monstrous total but collapsed badly. Australia kept up with the rate for a long while but then lost their way.
RE: Cricket Banter - Charlemagne - 09-10-2022 19:03
A few years ago if you put up a 150 score, then you had a decent chance of winning the game. But now (after seeing the Pakistan and this test) the required total seems to be around the 200 mark.
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 11-10-2022 20:48
A much tougher test for England in the 2nd T20I, with Scarc, Cummins, Hazlewood, Zampa, & Maxwell, all available for selection. Doubtful that Mark Wood will play back to back matches.
RE: Cricket Banter - Snooks - 11-10-2022 21:16
Anything less than 720 for 0 won't do
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 12-10-2022 09:07
Australia v England 2nd T20I Camberra (09.10 BST)
Australia won the toss
ENG 178-7 Malan 82 Ali 44 Stoinis 3-34 Zampa 26
AUS 170-6 Marsh 45 David 40 S Curran 3-25
England won by 8 runs
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 12-10-2022 09:16
(11-10-2022 20:48 )Boomerangutangangbang Wrote: A much tougher test for England in the 2nd T20I, with Scarc, Cummins, Hazlewood, Zampa, & Maxwell, all available for selection. Doubtful that Mark Wood will play back to back matches.For Australia all the 5 listed above come int replace Green, Sams, Swepson, Richardson, & Ellis.
England rest Wood & Woakes, with Jordan & Willey selected.
RE: Cricket Banter - Boomerangutangangbang - 12-10-2022 09:43
England have named player contracts for October 22 - September 23. With 18 fully contracted players, 10 are those who played in the majority of this summer's tests, including the highly thought of Crawley, but not his opening partner Lees, who must surely be on borrowed time. Foakes receives his first full contract, Livingstone has been ungraded to a full contract. Roy & Malan have been downgraded too incremental contracts.
Of the current players, Jordan has lost his incremental contract, with Brook, Potts, & Topley added.
New players with pace-bowling development contracts, are Fisher, Carse, & Jamie Overton.
RE: Cricket Banter - Snooks - 12-10-2022 22:03
The more I think about it the more I suspect fielding will play a massive role in determining so many matches in the World T20.
In today's Australia v England pre tournament match it proved highly significant yet again.