RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 01-04-2015 11:36
There is a possibility that someone just saw the word Xtra on the channel selections (Xtra Naughty) and just thought that it was BS Extra, and that it was a mistake, although if they are unaware of what they are transmitting, they were lucky that they didn't choose the unblurred version, which was freely showing on a certain website, on the BS Extra tab.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Rammyrascal - 01-04-2015 11:38
(01-04-2015 11:30 )amy1 Wrote: (01-04-2015 10:54 )murphdogg11 Wrote: The blurred screen was just totally daft!
Was it on all night?
Till about midnight
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - TheProf - 01-04-2015 11:45
Whilst OFCOM is undoubtedly the ultimate arbiter of acceptability of Babeshow content - do not forget that SKY and FREEVIEW carry the channels on their platforms, and have an equally powerful say as to whether the shows get on air or not. They will certainly not want any public rows about unencrypted 'porn' being shown on their platforms.
Furthermore, unlike OFCOM, they are not obliged to publish any informal 'discussions' they might have had with BS about content restrictions - so could this be an explanation for the sudden cooling of BS content?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - 301 - 01-04-2015 12:05
^
Sky only provide an EPG Platform service, they have no say in content, the only thing they say about content is there needs to be a certain amount of non looping content shown per day. Only the broadcast regulator can intervene content wise, I dont Sky think actually care what is shown, as long as they get their EPG fee.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Headgear - 01-04-2015 12:12
I think it's time for these shows to just be on the web - clearly of com are stamping down hard and we re going to end up back with the babes wearing 2 pairs of pants again - just think how good it would be if we could repeat the old days without ofcom interference - flash the gash, see through knickers and who can forget lucy summers, emily dean and others giving themselves wedgies and covering themselves in oil - yum yum
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - iluvcathy - 01-04-2015 14:29
(01-04-2015 12:12 )Headgear Wrote: I think it's time for these shows to just be on the web
No, it's time for ofcom to fuck off, and leave us all to enjoy these shows in peace.
Surely telling us what we can and can't watch is a breach of our human rights, as they are discriminating against the majority in favour of the minority
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - admiral decker - 01-04-2015 14:43
(01-04-2015 12:12 )Headgear Wrote: I think it's time for these shows to just be on the web
Which is what Ofcom have wanted all along.
They would be able to celebrate a total victory.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 01-04-2015 18:13
The only way for Babestation or any of the other babe channels to survive is to remain on the telly. If a web only show was clearly the solution to this then the concept to have them also on the telly would have been abandoned a long time ago.
So far since the BS shows have been on the telly we firstly had the Sexstation TV webshow show which was then rebranded unleashed and as good as these web only shows are Babestation as a company would not survive solely in that market only. No more TV broadcasts would absolutely kill their webshows stone dead in my opinion.
The only victory ofcom would achieve would be by forcing these channels out of existence and that would be it.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ceasman - 01-04-2015 18:47
Do you have to be a member to watch these shows as I couldn't see anything on the web stream last night ?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 01-04-2015 23:17
(01-04-2015 14:29 )iluvcathy Wrote: (01-04-2015 12:12 )Headgear Wrote: I think it's time for these shows to just be on the web
No, it's time for ofcom to fuck off, and leave us all to enjoy these shows in peace.
Surely telling us what we can and can't watch is a breach of our human rights, as they are discriminating against the majority in favour of the minority
Sadly, 'Ofcon', and the UK Government, whether Tory or Labour, aren't interested in Human Rights - They pander to the 'outraged' Tabloids, and whichever 'moral minority' lobby groups shout the loudest, making yet more repressive, rights' abusing legislation in response. Just look at how the ridiculous notion of 'offence' is now all but a heinous crime! No wonder 'competitive outrage' is the No. 1 sport!
It's been said many times before, but, the only way to stop 'Ofcon', and any other rights' abusing authority, is by legal means, and the channels have had plenty of opportunity to do so, but haven’t - I can't see that changing. 
Oh, and I agree with the general opinion, Tamestation has been fully living up to its moniker of late - just dire!
|