RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Block - 03-04-2015 15:29
(03-04-2015 14:35 )Captain Vimes Wrote: (02-04-2015 22:57 )Regenerated Wrote:
Here's my considered and frankly much more interesting point of view, , regarding the babe channels no matter what type of licence they possess.
You will get a blast, maybe a show, maybe a few shows, that are, let's say of interest to the regulatory body, they are good shows, this will be followed by weeks of standard fare.
Knowing their audience and paying shleps a couple of 'out of the box' performances here and there to garner interest and playing on men being dickheads and thinking with our dicks, and we do, they can hold onto their callers hoping for the same. After a few weeks, calls drop, couple of 'out of the box' shows renew interest.
This could all be bollocks as I sit here in my undercrackers with my special multi-layered tin foil hat on.
C'mon Captain, you're giving the producers of these channels far too much credit, suggesting they actually know what they are doing. 
They haven't got a clue. Some of the more experienced girls know what the punter wants and will try to provide a good show.
They when get restricted by being put on the wrong set or being made to wear an outfit they aren't comfortable with.
If they can manage to overcome these barriers then they will provided wih an inept cameraman or an overly nervous producer.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Captain Vimes - 03-04-2015 16:52
(03-04-2015 15:29 )Block Wrote: C'mon Captain, you're giving the producers of these channels far too much credit, suggesting they actually know what they are doing. 
In my defence Block I did point out that I was in my undercrackers and wearing a multi-layered tin foil hat so any crack pot theory then becomes worthy of discussion.
Wibble.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 03-04-2015 20:32
I don't know if it's much to read into or not but Danni said on the mic last night that Xtra is now the filthiest channel on Babestation, I wonder if they now either:
A Now hold the Dutch licence or
B Also hold a Dutch licence
As BS1 was actually the tamest of the lot again. I'll let all the conspiracy theory's now develop
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Tractor boy - 03-04-2015 21:15
I think you are probably right, Dannii has been getting naked a lot on bs xtra recently and the last few nights on bs1 have been tamed down. The question is why would they change the Dutch license from one channel to another, why not get Dutch licenses for all the channels ?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 03-04-2015 21:27
Fast forward to a few hours and cue the moaners as to why Lori is getting to hog Xtra allnight long
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - davetherave57 - 03-04-2015 21:29
Well it sure seems odd with no nakedness on BS1... and both Extra & Blue getting it all :-(
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 03-04-2015 21:41
Give it a few weeks and BS Blue will be the strongest channel.
Dutch licence pass the parcel just to confuse everyone
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - davetherave57 - 03-04-2015 21:53
(03-04-2015 21:41 )snookered147 Wrote: Give it a few weeks and BS Blue will be the strongest channel.
Dutch licence pass the parcel just to confuse everyone 
That parcel won't get through customs, let alone fuofcom
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - REX MASTER - 03-04-2015 23:17
On BS1 we have the Sexy Ms Jenna Hoskins on Sky... But however on BS1 we have Lori Buckby on Freeview how come this is happening? Has anyone else noticed this?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - circles_o_o_o - 03-04-2015 23:22
I don't have sky but the online feed for BS1 is showing Jenna, while Lori is on Freeview.
|