RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - forumdude - 25-05-2015 19:05
(25-05-2015 16:50 )mrmann Wrote: Something about handheld is so much fun, as it's interactive, even if it's tiring for the cameraman to do.
It makes a tame clothed show better,if a girl isnt naked the handheld camera should be in use
Bring back lucy summers,she did the best pov shows when she was on st66,shes being wasted on babestation!!
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 25-05-2015 19:10
And my anticipation for tonight lowers
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 25-05-2015 20:04
(25-05-2015 19:05 )forumdude Wrote: (25-05-2015 16:50 )mrmann Wrote: Something about handheld is so much fun, as it's interactive, even if it's tiring for the cameraman to do.
It makes a tame clothed show better,if a girl isnt naked the handheld camera should be in use
Bring back lucy summers,she did the best pov shows when she was on st66,shes being wasted on babestation!!
I agree with what your saying here 100%. pov can make a good babe show special in my eyes. The cameraman becomes you, the viewer/caller, in essence. Babe shows should be all about interaction and body language. pov gives the babe her best chance to get personal and intimate with those. It is her real chance to be expressive. Unfortunately, tame production across the channels has let the side down massively on this one. The terror of the tiniest up-close slip has led to a decrease in what was once the defining feature of a lot of our shows. To me, it is a significant factor in how the babe channels are losing their identity.
However... what really made me want to reply to your post is the implication (maybe unintentionally here) that often gets levelled across this forum that clothed = tame. I fail to understand this reasoning. I'd much rather see a hot girl in a tiny thong gyrating inches from the camera than most side-on naked ass any day.
If the former is tame to the watcher no matter what, then the babe shows are tame, because by definition what we have known as the babe shows since, what, 2006(?) has not been allowed to show any more than that. Naked on a babe show is still no pussy - so how is it any less tame?! It isn't, it is merely as tame or as un-tame as the babe is making it at any given time. Naked on a TV babeshow doesn't automatically make it hotter than a hot clothed section by any stretch of the imagination surely.
Sorry for the rant, just had to get that one over because I feel this sort of attitude pervades the air sometimes and can actually end up effecting the sort of shows we get.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 25-05-2015 20:31
(25-05-2015 18:19 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Maddison has tweeted she isn't on tonight this evening. Don't know who is replacing her or whether it will be Victoria & Kandi tonight
Well that fucking sucks She is one of the few decent babes left at this channel. Kandi has become too boring for me and Victoria has never been my type
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 25-05-2015 20:38
I think the trick for any babe on any channel is to cater for as many tastes as possible.
A lot can be catered for in just one stint.
Choose a sexy themed outfit.
Then wear it in a relevant set.
Some outfit play.
A slow striptease to full nudity.
Some nudity.
Some POV at different stages.
Horny body language and varied positions and poses throughout.
Job done.
The best stints incorporate a bit of everything.
What it requires is imagination and ambition from babe and channel alike.
Hardly rocket science.
But unfortunately it appears to be too much to ask of S66 and it's rivals most of the time.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 26-05-2015 00:02
(25-05-2015 20:38 )snookered147 Wrote: I think the trick for any babe on any channel is to cater for as many tastes as possible.
A lot can be catered for in just one stint...
Bang on the money as always snookered.
My post wasn't supposed to imply any desired limit on the shows in their range btw. I was merely trying to contain myself to the elements mentioned in the previous post. My posts tend to be long enough when I stick to the subject as it is!
Variety and spontaneity should always be king in the babe show. That's why the uptight attitudes, often on show there of late, spoil them.
Doing these shows well isn't rocket science. But I think the disappointments of many on this forum comes from a disassociation between our ideals of what the shows should be and those of many at the channels. We want the best shows, they want to make the most money as easily as possible. These things are often not compatible.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - interzone - 26-05-2015 22:06
Can't be long before this gets the pull surely? Absolute rubbish.
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 26-05-2015 23:06
I hardly need to say what I perceive to be the source of chief torment on S66 tonight.
Here's a clue: It isn't the babes.
Hmmmm what could possibly be the problem? .
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 26-05-2015 23:40
Come on producer, do want to do POV or not? The ladies want to give a good show tonight
RE: Elite TV/Studio 66 - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 27-05-2015 04:35
not picking St66 stream currently unavailable, WYF is going?
|