RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - lovebabes56 - 16-04-2015 20:12
(16-04-2015 13:24 )Censorship :-( Wrote: (16-04-2015 11:38 )Jay39 Wrote: It's got nothing to do with SKY, they do don't regulate the channels Ofcom do, I'm sure someone else has already stated this. BS 1 has gone back over on SKY yet on freeview they seem to be getting shows that SKY had previously. Now if BS1 still has a NICAM licence, then there is sod all Ofcom can do about the output and NICAM will not do anything aslong as it is in their acceptance level for viewing. It does make me wonder why they no longer promote the hell out of BSX on BS1 when under that licence they can do so!
Do they get more freeview callers than they do on SKY! If they were not then maybe by putting the better shows on freeview they hope to use it as a marketing ploy!
Until someone from BS say's something then all we can do is guess and as a SKY viewer say how poor their shows have become.
Just to be clear, Tamestation is crap on FV too!
I thought there is enough crap on FV without adding Tamestation to it!!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - TheProf - 17-04-2015 09:29
(15-04-2015 22:14 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Well exactly and only just last week they aired the formerly banned sexplotation movie Bare Behind Bars which is another channel which SKY takes no responsibility for either.
There is a huge difference between the licence conditions for 'Entertainment' channels, such as the ones you mentioned above, and 'Advertising' channels which include the Babe Channels.
You just can not compare what is acceptable and allowed on SKY Arts etc with BabeStation etc.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 17-04-2015 15:49
(17-04-2015 09:29 )TheProf Wrote: There is a huge difference between the licence conditions for 'Entertainment' channels, such as the ones you mentioned above, and 'Advertising' channels which include the Babe Channels.
You just can not compare what is acceptable and allowed on SKY Arts etc with BabeStation etc.
Thanking for telling me something that I already knew TheProf having preached the same message myself on this forum numerous times.
What you perhaps didn't know is that SKY are not the ones responsible for enforcing the rules on the channels, its ofcom, always has been and always will be just to kill all accusations of SKY having any involvement in the toning down of Babestation or any other channel for that matter stone dead.
As for the show last night, it was marginally better but still no where near what it was like last month at this time. After reading the posts by DJ NES it doesn't strike me as a channel that is under the cosh by ofcom as the boss seemed to be in a somewhat jovial mood so on that note. Thanks for the toning down experiment now time I think to get BS back on track again
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - dave34 - 17-04-2015 21:40
Bs extra looks much better then bs1 at mo or am I wrong. I think things will change after the girls that they have lose have been replaced. As that is what bs has been doing.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 17-04-2015 21:51
I'm not really in a serious mood so no offence intended and naming no names...
but if you really were attempting to have sex with a lady gyrating her hips as wildly as that I'd be afraid they'd probably twist/break your member off in the process. Certainly looks hazardous.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - REX MASTER - 17-04-2015 21:58
(17-04-2015 21:51 )M-L-L Wrote: I'm not really in a serious mood so no offence intended and naming no names...
but if you really were attempting to have sex with a lady gyrating her hips as wildly as that I'd be afraid they'd probably twist/break your member off in the process. Certainly looks hazardous.
Which babe are you on about dude???
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - amy1 - 17-04-2015 22:12
caty wearing the same panties, on the same set, sat in the same position. Are they looping the same exact recorded show every night?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 17-04-2015 22:22
Just a question to ponder over, just how the hell is it possible to have sex in the gym if the babe isn't even allowed to take her panties off. This is contraception brought to a whole new level.
Come on BS cut the shit, either you've got a Dutch licence for BS1 or you don't
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 17-04-2015 23:30
(17-04-2015 22:12 )amy1 Wrote: caty wearing the same panties, on the same set, sat in the same position. Are they looping the same exact recorded show every night?
Repetitive shows? On Tamestation? Surely not!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 17-04-2015 23:35
From the little I've seen (their streams are a bit of a disaster), Sin TV looks MUCH better than Tamestation (yeah, I know, not difficult).
What are the chances of TS responding positively, by massively upping their game? Or, are they more likely to have a word with their chums at 'Ofcon'?
|