The UK Babe Channels Forum
Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=24)
+--- Forum: Former Daytime Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=237)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 TV Daytime (formerly Elite TV Daytime) (/forumdisplay.php?fid=266)
+----- Forum: Lucy-Anne Brooks (/forumdisplay.php?fid=420)
+----- Thread: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=285)



RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - kifkiz - 07-01-2016 22:32

I'd take it with a grain of salt... its a bit obvious them and their PR company are trying to keep them relevant and "leaking" all these stories to be posted on the news site.


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - minordriver - 08-01-2016 00:04

Yeah I wouldn't be surprised if it was self done, It looks like they have been in make up for about a day before the photos were taken.

So doubt it stressed them out that much if it did at all.


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - FanofCamilla - 08-01-2016 20:36

share the story?


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 08-01-2016 21:07

^ http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/75k-selfie-sisters-traumatised-after-7135838

As kifkiz says this is almost definitely a load of old hogwash (geddit Tongue ) instigated by the trio's new "management" deal.

Can you believe people get paid to come up with this shite?! What they going to do to keep their little fart of fame alive next week?! bladewave


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 08-01-2016 23:59

(24-12-2015 10:33 )jimmyt73 Wrote:  SNIP
maybe her ability to make them money has suffered as a result of her rinsing activity

SNIP

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=18626&pid=1815554#pid1815554


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 09-01-2016 00:19

^ Likely shot at the beginning of December when the story had just hit, as referenced here:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/selfie-sisters-who-earned-75k-6948886
(unless this latest was another appearance).

But, like I say, how is this one-note story sustainable from here?

Only if the can dredge-up a desperate production outfit for a shot at a reality TV series is this story to have a chance effecting their money-making abilities either way in the long-term IMO. It may well have (or already have had) some other knock on effects for them though.


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 09-01-2016 00:57

(08-01-2016 21:07 )ShandyHand Wrote:  Can you believe people get paid to come up with this shite?!

Yes because the story was run in the press and was therefore successful.

Most people would expect to pay for successful PR.


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - kifkiz - 09-01-2016 01:31

I would hardly call being in one of a million online articles a success and I imagine its not difficult for a PR company to get an online article published.

To me these articles have been desperate rather than signs of success.

I used to be a fan of lucy for the way she looks and she could be a bit of fun on the phones (i even posted caps for her) but the endless self promotion lately lost it for me.


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - BarrieBF - 09-01-2016 01:57

(09-01-2016 01:31 )kifkiz Wrote:  I imagine its not difficult for a PR company to get an online article published.

So you expect their PR guy to work for free?


RE: Lucy-Anne - Chat & Discussion - Charlemagne - 09-01-2016 12:14

This Robby guy has certainly brought Lucy Anne and her sisters lots of TV & newspaper fame.
He seems to be the guy behind the selfie sisters publicity.

But you have to ask if all publicity is good publicity.
Is being famous just for being greedy a good thingHuh
So it's not famous but infamous