+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Bang Babes (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Thread: RIP Bang Babes : Gone Bust... (/showthread.php?tid=26854)
RE: RIP Bang Babes - kasone - 27-11-2010 09:10
There are too many hypocrites on this forum, one minute they love all the mistakes by the girls and next minute when one of these channels get shut down, they moan about what they should and shouldnt of done, i dont remember one person complaining when the mistakes was made, but now they closed the channel down, we see lots of "I don't condone what this channel did" ect.
Another point to make, if your a parent and your worried your child will see this type of show, well my suggestion would be put a child lock on these channels that way they dont get to watch them, with sky you can block any channel that you deem unfit for your child, now I would expect that freeview has some sort of parental lock as well.
I watched these shows when lots of mistakes and mishaps happened, I quite enjoyed the shows put on for us, sneaky glimpses here and there and I expect that a good majority of people on this forum also enjoyed the shows when mistakes happened, these mistakes and mishaps arent just related to Bangmedia, all channels have made mistakes and with these channels being shut down and losing their licences could have a vast effect on other channels. Like for example going back to a fully dressed presenter during the day, no knicker removal at night ect.
If that did happen more members on this forum would complain or whine about it
RE: RIP Bang Babes - gazfc - 27-11-2010 09:43
They haven't had the licence revoked because of 'mistakes' it's been revoked due to blatant rule brakes, so maybe you should of read the thread before you called us hypocrites
RE: RIP Bang Babes - JackGough - 27-11-2010 09:59
(27-11-2010 01:51 )mr williams Wrote: Mr BibbleBabble makes a very good point - if you read the Ofcom adjudication against BB back in August some of the infractions took place between "01.15 and 02.25" in the morning. Most of us would wonder what the f*** they were doing up that late (unless playing with themselves whist watching the girls) BUT some of the infractions took place during the afternoon.
What consenting adults do at night-time is one thing and if Ofcom doesn't like what goes out at 2.00 am they can f*** off - but I'm sorry, even I can't in any way condone or sympathise with breaches during the daytime...
No, the most recent breaches were happening in the AM when children were likely to be getting up and ready for school.
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/enforcement/broadcast-bulletins/breach-26-november-2010/
Quote:Early Bird, 9 November 2010 06:41 to 08:43
The female presenter was wearing a black bra, lace thong and black shoes. At various points throughout the broadcast she was seen gyrating her hips, stroking herself and mimicking sexual intercourse. She also adopted various sexual positions.
Early Bird, 10 November 2010 05:46 to 08:33
The female presenter was wearing a black thong, lace black bra, red shoes and red suspenders. The presenter was shown with her legs open to camera, mimicking sexual intercourse. She was also shown stroking her inner thigh and breasts and gyrating her hips in a sexual manner.
A second presenter was shown from approximately 06:00 to 06:30. She was wearing a white thong and a white strap, with a pink lace trim across her breasts. During the 30 minutes she was shown stroking herself; jiggling her breasts to camera and gyrating her hips in a sexualised manner.
Early Bird, 11 November 2010 05:39 to 08:37
The presenter was wearing fishnet stockings, a black lace bodice and thong. The presenter was shown adopting various sexual positions mimicking sexual intercourse. While in those positions she was seen gyrating and thrusting her hips in a sexual manner.
Early Bird, 12 November 2010 05:31 to 08:04
The female presenter was wearing a black thong and bra, with leather gloves and boots. She was shown at various points, for prolonged periods, with her legs wide open to camera mimicking sexual intercourse. She was also seen stroking her breasts and jiggling her buttocks.
Early Bird, 13 November 2010 05:36 to 08:35
The first presenter was wearing nipple plasters, stockings and a black string outfit. She was shown adopting various sexual positions including on all fours and lying on her back with her legs wide open. Whilst in these positions she was shown gyrating her hips and stroking herself in a sexual manner.
The second presenter was wearing a black and red thong and bra with black fishnet stockings. She was seen lying on her back with her legs open to camera, gyrating her hips. She was also noted jiggling her breasts to camera.
Early Bird, 14 November 2010 07:18 to 07:39
The presenter was wearing a black lace bra and thong. She was shown lying on her back with her legs open stroking herself and slowly gyrating her hips in a sexual manner.
Early Bird, 15 November 2010 05:35 to 07:39
The presenter was wearing a turquoise bra and knickers with white stockings. She was shown adopting sexual positions such as lying on her side with her legs open heavily thrusting her hips and on her knees jiggling her breasts to camera.
OK, it could be argued that such material is not suitable for general daytime mainstream TV. I think we could all agree that the majority of the population would not want to see that type of broadcast during the day mixed in with normal channels. If you do agree then you should also agree by default that there is a need to seperate the channels from the rest by some form of consent being given.
Whether that is hiding the adult section of the EPG by default on SKY boxes, or PIN protecting every channel (as they do with 12A+ movies which are broadcast in the daytime), that is up for debate.
OFCOM, I presume, have the power to recommend/order a move to such restriction. Presumably the channels do too. Maybe someone more informed on the topic can advise if that is possible.
Once BANG take their medicine, if they are still around, that could be a potential solution to the broadcasting of borderline material such as that described above during daytime hours.
It would not be unreasonable to suggest that these channels be PIN protected during the day like movies unsuitable for young children are.
RE: RIP Bang Babes - kasone - 27-11-2010 10:01
yeah that is my point no one complained when they broke the rules on this forum, but now they come out the closet and start to lay the blame, so yes hypocrites, did you watch the shows when these rules was broken and did you complain, I dont think so, I guessing that you enjoyed it when they broke the rules.
RE: RIP Bang Babes - Rammyrascal - 27-11-2010 10:03
exactly bangbabes have been blatantly breaking the rules, 60 times in 18 months and nothing to do with mistakes. bang had enough warnings to get their act together but didnt so no wonder ofcom had enough and took licences
RE: RIP Bang Babes - kasone - 27-11-2010 10:16
On that list of rules broken, how many of the channels do that every day, all of them, you cant tell me that one channel doesnt break those rules, what are the girls wearing today, bikinis, underwear, are they laying down or bending over, yes most of them are, and to make a point on babestation is Hannah Clandon right this minute, in a bra and tights, girating her hips on the bed, elite, rachel stroking her ass, is this more than what bangbabes did, might be slightly less but it is still sexual and this is what the channels all do, every day.
RE: RIP Bang Babes - gazfc - 27-11-2010 10:29
(27-11-2010 10:01 )kasone Wrote: yeah that is my point no one complained when they broke the rules on this forum, but now they come out the closet and start to lay the blame, so yes hypocrites, did you watch the shows when these rules was broken and did you complain, I dont think so, I guessing that you enjoyed it when they broke the rules.
So now your calling them 'rule brakes' and not 'mistakes' make your mind up as there's quite a differences between the 2. And to answer your question, no I didnt complain but why would I, I'm not a channel owner so I dont know what can and what cant be broadcast.
And most of the other channels have received warnings for various rule breaks but they dont just stick their head in the sand and ignore them. If ofcom saw that bang was at least making an effort they probably would of left them alone.
If ofcom really wanted to censor everything and kill off the babechannels they would of done it by now.
RE: RIP Bang Babes - TonTon - 27-11-2010 11:01
I agree with the last two comments. The only reason the license was revoked was because Bang Babes simply did nothing, didn't play the game and basically just ignored Ofcom, which gave Ofcom enough rope to hang them out to dry. Very, very silly all they had to do was to be seen to be making an effort.
That said for a channel thats supposed to be gone they have a very good webshow on at the moment. Perhaps there will be a quick sale, change of management and a new company shortly and they will be back on Sky again shortly.
All it would take is different magangement and seemly different share holders. Companies do that all the time! So I wouldn't RIP them just yet!
If a pub landlord looses his license he just gets his wife to apply and bingo the pub is open... to the punters there is no difference!
RE: RIP Bang Babes - Rammyrascal - 27-11-2010 11:02
exactly gazfc if ofcom wanted to kill the babeshows off they would have done. also as you say the other shows have had warnings but unlike bang they didnt ignore them
RE: RIP Bang Babes - bigguy01 - 27-11-2010 11:23
damned if you do damned if you dont. live by the sword die by the sword. hopefully they now where the lines are now, maddness line from baggy trousers "bend not break the rules"
rules are meant to be bent not broken. yes push the rules to limits but dont break them.