The UK Babe Channels Forum
Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion - Printable Version

+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Night Shows (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Former Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=236)
+---- Forum: Studio 66 Cougars (/forumdisplay.php?fid=318)
+---- Thread: Studio66 Cougars - General Chat & Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=57344)



RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - Joey 27 - 03-11-2013 16:39

(03-11-2013 11:04 )mr williams Wrote:  
(02-11-2013 21:17 )t-belltosin Wrote:   I am intrigued into why anyone would want to watch or call a 40+ channel.

One point that I don't think has been mentioned so far is how long some of these girls have been in the adult industry and that many of the older members will have grown up with them.

Strange as it sounds now, I can remember Cathy Barry being a slim teenager!

Cathy, Faye Rampton, Laura Jones etc have been around for 20-odd years, a number of others have clocked up 15 years+ and they were the young hotties of our youth. And you also have to remember that access to ANY sexual material, let alone hardcore. was a lot harder to obtain in those days. In this world of 24 hour internet porn it's impossible for young people to even imagine how shady and undercover porn videos were and how risque and controversial the original Adult Channel was when it launched!

In 15-20 years time those younger members who can't understand why people would want to call a 40+ channel will still have fond memories of Tori Lee, Ella Jolie, Clare Richards, Preeti & Priya, Adele Taylor etc who themselves will be 40+ by then, so should any of them still be around get ready for the flack from the next generation when you say you like them!
i think most of the current 20 something babes will still look good when they are 40+, dionne still looks great and she is 39 i think, though the current 20 some things probably won't be on these channels when they are 40 they would have long moved on by then

this golden girls channel don't appeal to me so i won;t be watching anyway


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - Rob169 - 03-11-2013 16:50

(03-11-2013 13:48 )mr mystery Wrote:  
(03-11-2013 13:27 )Rob169 Wrote:  is there any of the "milfs" that technical are not milfs bladewave ie. that have no children

That would all depend on who are the Ladies you would like to fuck, MILF = Mother I'd Like to Fuck
Maybe if you named a few of the Ladies you think are MILF's on this channel then someone my have the answer ? .

no one in particular, was just flipping the coin when some people are saying there are as many younger girls who ARE milfs i was just wondering if there were any of the older ones tagged as milfs who dont have kids


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - Forum Style - 03-11-2013 17:18

Because that's what this thread desperately needed ... semantic pedantry.


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - KRISB - 03-11-2013 17:33

(03-11-2013 17:18 )Forum Style Wrote:  Because that's what this thread desperately needed ... semantic pedantry.

semantic pedantry

is this not a form of foot fetish?


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 03-11-2013 17:41

I think if this channel is going to survive, that the women should go nude at times.


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 03-11-2013 17:54

^
Well Patti is on tonight, so you never know you may get to see what you think these Ladies should do, i'm not sure if Patti generally gets nude or not ?.


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - Roger Patterson - 03-11-2013 18:01

(03-11-2013 17:41 )mrmann Wrote:  I think if this channel is going to survive, that the women should go nude at times.

According to southlondonphil it's survived 7 years already, probably longer, so what they're doing now must work.


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 03-11-2013 18:16

(03-11-2013 18:01 )Roger Patterson Wrote:  
(03-11-2013 17:41 )mrmann Wrote:  I think if this channel is going to survive, that the women should go nude at times.

According to southlondonphil it's survived 7 years already, probably longer, so what they're doing now must work.

This is a new channel, run by a different company, the girls have worked for other company's that have had a specialist channel dedicated to more mature Ladies, these former company's eventually went into dissolution .
During the years when the 40+ channel was run by the Sport XXX people some of the girls appearing on the 40+ channel regularly went naked, Serena (Hazel May) being one, Serena was a good performer, i don't know what she is doing nowadays but she would be a good addition to this channels line up .
Golden Girls just like any other channel should try to mix things up in terms of what style of performance the Ladies put on .


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - mr williams - 03-11-2013 18:25

(03-11-2013 17:33 )KRISB Wrote:  semantic pedantry

is this not a form of foot fetish?

Are you related to Captain Vimes? Big Grin


RE: Golden Girls TV - General Chat & Discussion - t-belltosin - 03-11-2013 18:45

Oh god foot fetishes, 40+ women can this thread get any more unattractive Bounce

Before the commotion starts again this is my opinion. If you for one like feet and older women good for you. That doesn't mean I can't express my views Shy