+- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk)
+-- Forum: Other Adult Websites (/forumdisplay.php?fid=194)
+--- Forum: Personal Fan Sites (/forumdisplay.php?fid=395)
+--- Thread: OnlyFans - Rule Changes (/showthread.php?tid=84425)
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - iloveMegan - 24-08-2021 00:12
(23-08-2021 23:26 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Didn't I read a post somewhere saying she'd done b/g on hers?
She has, and most of them were released in multiple parts at $50 a pop. I wonder how many sales of those contributed to the $1M the article mentions her earning?
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - dundeered - 24-08-2021 00:33
(23-08-2021 22:31 )dundeered Wrote: Dannii Harwood has had her say on the OnlyFans changes.
https://inews.co.uk/news/technology/glamour-onlyfans-hardcore-porn-ban-nudity-dannii-harwood-1162240?ito=social_ifb_theipaper&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR3RU7-ijVwqoAV1VCvGhaLsAGNSaWaRQC_YSX8dz0Ofl-Ouim9DGqPlkB4#Echobox=1629709201
There is a further article in The Financial Times, just Google “OnlyFans drops sex and embraces a soft-core future” to get around the FT’s paywall.
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - CIA Snooper - 24-08-2021 01:11
(23-08-2021 19:25 )Rammyrascal Wrote: Only fans sure has gambled here and at the moment could be the lsoers
They could also be the winners. Even if their revenue drops in the short term they could still end up a bigger company in the long run.
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - bigglesworth - 24-08-2021 02:32
(23-08-2021 22:31 )dundeered Wrote: Dannii Harwood has had her say on the OnlyFans changes.
I don't agree with her assessment that platforms offering only adult content won't last. If offering only adult content means inevitable failure there wouldn't be any porn sites of any kind.
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - The Silent Majority - 24-08-2021 07:21
She's hardly impartial though, given that she's a friend of the founder and apparently runs a management company representing 250 of the girls on OF.
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - lovebabes56 - 24-08-2021 08:21
(23-08-2021 23:26 )The Silent Majority Wrote: Didn't I read a post somewhere saying she'd done b/g on hers?
I think several b/g videos. I have followed/subbed to her on and off once asked her how much for a custom and she wanted $100 up front before even discussing said video content. I'd wager her management company contributes at least 50% to that $1m earnnig tag though though I'm pretty sure Lucy Anne Brooks can't be that far behind her though either. She (Lucy) is one who I would have expected to speak out about it too but I don't know if she has left OF or not.
I can't see her jumping ship but with Radvinsky's dodgy porn past exposure I am wondering if it would be only a matter of time.
Oner of my creators moved to Fansly so I hope more will follow there then I can close my OF account. Have any St66 girls pop up on Fanz World yet? I would be surprised if none are there
Have taken decision to remove card from OF and will ony re sub to to Stormi's Danni K's if theirs are still active there and will follow others on other platforms.
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - The Silent Majority - 24-08-2021 08:37
Jess West looks to have gone to admireme.
She'll be pretty savvy, which suggests it might be one of the better ones.
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - tony confederate - 24-08-2021 10:54
(21-08-2021 18:34 )ShandyHand Wrote: Mastercard have created a situation in which OF felt compelled to REMOVE whole swathes of legal material.
Compelled seems a rather inappropriate word here. Other platforms are not removing their sexually explicit material, so OnlyFans could have kept it on their platform too.
OnlyFans have decided to avoid the new rules rather than comply with them, but that's their own choice and not something they should have felt any complusion over.
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - darren73 - 24-08-2021 11:14
Lucy Anne is moving to another site soon
RE: OnlyFans - Rule Changes - ShandyHand - 24-08-2021 11:44
(24-08-2021 10:54 )tony confederate Wrote:(21-08-2021 18:34 )ShandyHand Wrote: Mastercard have created a situation in which OF felt compelled to REMOVE whole swathes of legal material.
Compelled seems a rather inappropriate word here. Other platforms are not removing their sexually explicit material, so OnlyFans could have kept it on their platform too.
OnlyFans have decided to avoid the new rules rather than comply with them, but that's their own choice and not something they should have felt any complusion over.
What would you have done if you were them?