RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 12-05-2015 00:39
Not you on the paint as well Rex.
FFS what the heck have I started .
Bunch of bloody paint addicts .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - REX MASTER - 12-05-2015 00:54
Can I ask... Are these people that are running these Babechannels Absolutley stupid???
Come on... When a babe is speaking on the mic at least switch it on. It happens every night. Sometimes you can't hear the poor girl making her long speech or its sometimes making that crackling noise. It's not only BS it's on all the channels.
Even my little brother can do a better job a mic control. He used to DJ at family weddings and parties and as a little boy his mic never had any problems. These people running the channels should be professionals. But the are not. But hay what do we know.... We're just all a bunch of tossers!!!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 12-05-2015 22:13
(11-05-2015 23:37 )forumdude Wrote: BS wont get a penny from me until the shows go back to how they were 3 months ago!
This freeview stuff is nonsense and i recommend a complete boycott
3 Months? 3 years would be nearer the mark, IMO.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 12-05-2015 22:24
^
"I hear-by bring this meeting to order; first item on the agenda:-
I move that Scottishbloke & mrmann assume control at Tamestation – seconded?"
Seriously, their piss-take was more entertaining than anything seen on this channel in a very long time - sad, but true!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Snooks - 12-05-2015 22:40
(12-05-2015 00:54 )REX MASTER Wrote: Can I ask... Are these people that are running these Babechannels Absolutley stupid???
Errrrr well I hate to break it to you but........... Yes they really are that stupid .
Depressing isn't it?
I would stock up on some paint if I were you.
I would suggest having a cold shower but Rammy has used up the water supply of the whole of Western Europe thanks to a 'naked' (cough cough splutter splutter) Louise Porter on occasion .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 12-05-2015 23:18
I'm in a state of shock! Lori is actually wearing a pair of black, high heel, thigh-high boots!!!
OK, so it's not quite on the same level as seeing Lori take a facial, but hey, I approve!
Now, Lori, about that black, latex mini dress...
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 12-05-2015 23:19
^ How can you tell, most of the time she's being filmed from the waist up (if you're lucky)
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 12-05-2015 23:24
(12-05-2015 23:19 )M-L-L Wrote: ^ How can you tell, most of the time she's being filmed from the waist up (if you're lucky)
I'm hyper observant, and dedicated to the cause (the cause being 'observing' Lori )!
The D.O.Gs don't help either, but I'm sure I saw them (or was I dreaming?)
I hope she keeps them for her later, 'non-dom' sections - then we'll get a much better view... hopefully!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - M-L-L - 12-05-2015 23:26
You're not dreaming I saw them too, but for those that like that sort of thing I'd suggest it's a bit of a waste of time if the camera angles don't show them. Only now as I type this is the camera finally and briefly daring to stray below the waist occasionally.
I mean, I'm just an amateur and these type of shows aren't really my thing anyway so I don't really know what devotees of them want to see, but if the people that are into this like shots of boots and heels and the idea of being trampled on etc, and the producers are trying to appeal to this audience then why pick the alleyway set which is one of the narrowest and smallest and most hopeless for being able to show the whole babe in shot, instead one of the other sets where she can at least sit or lie and maybe put her feet up on a desk or something so they're in shot ? If that's a major selling point of these shows and something that callers for that type of show want to see then to my naïve eyes it's not delivering.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 12-05-2015 23:36
(12-05-2015 23:26 )M-L-L Wrote: You're not dreaming I saw them too, but for those that like that sort of thing I'd suggest it's a bit of a waste of time if the camera angles don't show them. Only now as I type this is the camera finally and briefly daring to stray below the waist occasionally.
I mean, I'm just an amateur and these type of shows aren't really my thing anyway so I don't really know what devotees of them want to see, but if the people that are into this like shots of boots and heels and the idea of being trampled on etc, and the producers are trying to appeal to this audience then why pick the alleyway set which is one of the narrowest and smallest and most hopeless for being able to show the whole babe in shot, instead one of the other sets where she can at least sit or lie and maybe put her feet up on a desk or something so they're in shot ? If that's a major selling point of these shows and something that callers for that type of show want to see then to my naïve eyes it's not delivering.
I'm not into DOM at all - I just dislike feet, so seeing Lori's covered up, which is almost unheard of, is a major improvement, IMO - if they happen to be in a nice pair of high heel boots, then so much the better!
|