Ofcom Discussion - Printable Version +- The UK Babe Channels Forum (https://www.babeshows.co.uk) +-- Forum: Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: UK Babe Channels (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Broadcasting Regulations (/forumdisplay.php?fid=138) +---- Thread: Ofcom Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=14756) Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 |
RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 11-06-2012 20:43 (08-06-2012 21:35 )dan g 27 Wrote: So from what I can gather, the only hope to end the censorship is a change of leadership at Ofcom, but not get rid of Ofcom. Am I right in saying that? Couldnt agree more. There is a case for saying there is no taste and decency regulator for papers and magazines, so why have one for TV now there are 1000 channels. (The PCC deals with privacy and defamation type cases, not general matters like racism, sex stories in the Daily Mail or topless birds in The Sun). But it isnt going to happen. Probably. Realistically if Ofcom is abolished it will only be replaced with some other TV regulation body under a different name. A TV only regulator might be the worst of all worlds as it would have nowhere else to show its credentials. At least Ofcom also deals with phone contracts and frequency allocation to phone companies so TV regulation is a fraction of what they do. What might work would be better democratic credentials, though that would attract headline grabbers. OK, what would work better would be a Content Board and full Board with decent credentials as creatives, not university academics, journalists and civil servants who wrote the legislation. And better evaluation of public opinion. And not taking single complaints and pressure groups seriously. That comes under reform, not replacement. RE: Ofcom Discussion - The Truth - 12-06-2012 23:11 What ofcom fails to realise,is that censorship is simply self defeating. All it does is create a society which is unable to exercise It's own discretion,to quote Clare Booth Luce; "Censorship like charity,should begin at home,but unlike charity,it should end there". So as a adult,I am unable to make my own viewing choices for fear of harming/corrupting those around me,I can drink myself to death with copious amounts of cheap booze,intoxicate my body with nicotine,vote for corrupt politicians to control my every action,but I am unable to view adult models uncensored on a adult television platform??? I'll end my rant for the night with a quote from E.M FORSTER; We are willing enough to praise freedom when she is safely tucked away in the past and cannot be a nuisance. In the present,amidst danger whose outcome we cannot foresee,we get nervous about her,and admit "CENSORSHIP" RE: Ofcom Discussion - mrmann - 13-06-2012 20:03 How quickly does Ofcom respond if a complaint is made? Say for example a person sees something they don't like on the TV, that is offensive to them and they called Ofcom to let them know. Would Ofcom immediately alert the channel in question and tell them off, or would they get to it eventually? This is in no way related to my post about Elite, Caty and the texting pics. I would never complain about ANY of the channels! I just am curious as to how quickly Ofcom alerts a channel if an immediate complaint is made. Sometimes I see some great sessions on these channels, and all is fine, then out of nowhere the women are quickly tamed and told to cool down, almost as if someone in the studio has taken notice and doesn't like it (Higher producer?), or as if Ofcom has called a studio to let them know a complaint has been made. Is it that immediate for the babe channels? If someone called in and complained, could a great session be tamed within a half hour because of a simple phone call to Ofcom? I should know this already, but I thought the process was a bit longer and that Ofcom mostly responded to letters/emails. RE: Ofcom Discussion - eccles - 15-06-2012 00:35 I doubt that Ofcom have night staff. A complaint would probably not even be read until the next working day. A nervous senior producer seems far more likely. RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 15-06-2012 01:31 Well did anyone see David Cameron getting questioned at the Leverson inquiry? Well I was at work at the time but during my lunch, I was listening to the part when the PM said that there were complaints from itv bbc and others about Ofcom getting to big and to powerful since they took over from there predecessors which was the ITC. Now the PM mentioned that he wanted to deregulate Ofcom in so many words, however he said that this legislation was put through, but it somehow slipped through the cracks due to having a coalition government i.e. the liberal democrats, though he never said directly, however he was clearly referring to the Lib Dems being the reason Ofcom hasn't been dealt with. As I've mentioned I only heard this during my lunch while at work, so please forgive me if I didn't get everything word for word, but at least you get the gist of what I'm saying. So I guess it begs the question if the Liberal Demorcats are the Stumbling block to all of this, then does anyone no the reasons why? And what happens next? RE: Ofcom Discussion - Tonywauk - 15-06-2012 21:32 (15-06-2012 01:31 )continental19 Wrote: Well did anyone see David Cameron getting questioned at the Leverson inquiry? Well I was at work at the time but during my lunch, I was listening to the part when the PM said that there were complaints from itv bbc and others about Ofcom getting to big and to powerful since they took over from there predecessors which was the ITC. One thing I did se on a documentary the other days was Cameron's original speech in which he said he was going to strip Ofcom of some of its powers. Some here have castigated him for going back on his promise however, far be it from me to stick up for this dreadful government, but he did say quite specifically that its over-all regulation of the industry was to be the power that it would lose, but that it would retain its responsibility for monitoring television content. RE: Ofcom Discussion - continental19 - 15-06-2012 21:48 (15-06-2012 21:32 )Tonywauk Wrote: One thing I did se on a documentary the other days was Cameron's original speech in which he said he was going to strip Ofcom of some of its powers. Some here have castigated him for going back on his promise however, far be it from me to stick up for this dreadful government, but he did say quite specifically that its over-all regulation of the industry was to be the power that it would lose, but that it would retain its responsibility for monitoring television content. Hmmm fair point Tony, I see what you're saying. RE: Ofcom Discussion - fedup1 - 16-06-2012 11:23 (06-06-2012 15:53 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Some people may have viewed my comments as somewhat controversial but yes I had a feeling that perhaps it might provoke a strong reaction. Just to reiterate I am not a racist or a bigot, but the way television and media is currently being regulated is biased towards the groups which I've mentioned. YES my argument all along,,why is the vagina offensive..What grounds do they have to ban the vagina..They allow everything else on UK tv except a vagina..Its so taboo and rape is on the up and i always accuse ofcom in promoting rape witheir sexist fucking attitudes every time i write..My goodness twitter went mad when they showed that penis on Embarrassing Illnesses,the man stood up pulled his pants down pulled backed his foreskin and had camera shot right down his urethra at 8.05pm..Other vagina that night consisted of 2 uploaded photos..17 complaints were made but utter disgust at channel 4 indecency before the watershed was rife round my neck of woods and twitter..It would have been explicit after the watershed...Ofcom does what it always does and shoves complaints under the carpet.. So oftwats what do you 800 staff with 67K salaries and upwards do 40hrs every week to earn that extortionate amount when everywhere else is been shutdown..I fucking hate the c@nting lot of them and they all shuold be up for fraud for FIDDLING THE FIGURES..Fraud is taken very,very seriously and ed richtwat should be in prison for fiddling and lying at what expenses it saves the government when they are all LIES.. Have written to Graham Howell to make a complaint against ofcom as he is the bloke to write to to do this...No reply yet so going to see whats next and i think its court of human rights.This sexist act has gone on for to fucking long..Ofcom need to have a valid anser as to why the most harmful thing in existance is female genatalia.. RE: Ofcom Discussion - shan_123 - 16-06-2012 11:38 (16-06-2012 11:23 )fedup Wrote:(06-06-2012 15:53 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Some people may have viewed my comments as somewhat controversial but yes I had a feeling that perhaps it might provoke a strong reaction. Just to reiterate I am not a racist or a bigot, but the way television and media is currently being regulated is biased towards the groups which I've mentioned. Well if the vagina was allowed to be shown, wouldnt the girls want to do more than just show? That would be the problem ofcom would have. RE: Ofcom Discussion - munch1917 - 16-06-2012 12:39 (16-06-2012 11:23 )fedup Wrote: ... Technically inaccurate. If you check the 'Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity' thread you'll see that vaginas are allowed on UK tv, they are often displayed on the same show you mention, Embarrassing Illnesses, as well as elsewhere. The place they are not allowed is on the babeshows (more specifically it seems it is frowned upon when shown in an openly sexual context). |