RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - ShandyHand - 26-05-2015 15:28
(26-05-2015 13:48 )Censorship :-( Wrote: ...is the conclusion that it is just some kind of (presumably commercial) decision by Cellcast?...
Well that's the conclusion I have come to (not going to speak for anyone else); the one I was trying to get at before. The Dutch licence still could be applied to BS1 across the board (otherwise something new would be listed for it with Ofcom) but for commercial reasons of their own (reasons something along the lines of what I've suggest before) they have decided to market it as just in use on the FV version. They will apply their own standards from there.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 26-05-2015 23:47
I've decided to report Babestation to Ofcom.
The reason?
Tame sessions
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 26-05-2015 23:50
I actually think that the freeview exclusives are a cover story. I honestly think there is some sort of issue going on with the Dutch Licence and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if ofcom are at the bottom of it all, I've always suspected that as the night after the cucumber show BS1 on SKY got toned down significantly.
Have you noticed that as soon as the freeview exclusive ends and the show broadcasts to SKY that the panties are always immediately put back on. This is more than Cellcast just experimenting or making a commercial decision about splitting the content. BS1 on SKY has had zero full nudity since the cucumber show. You can't bullshit a bullshitter
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 27-05-2015 00:07
^
At first i was wondering if the taming down of Sky BS1 had something to do with the cucumber show, but the thing is the cucumber show was also broadcast on freeview BS1, both have a Dutch licence, but only Sky has been tamed down, surely if it is something to do with Ofcom then both would have had to have been tamed down, but only the Sky shows has been tamed.
Basically i don't even have a theory about what's behind it, which is not like me lol .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 27-05-2015 00:21
Well mr mystery for many years you and me have witnessed the cynical and totally baffling tactics deployed at Ofcom HQ having had many a long winded discussion on that part of the forum and with ofcom just about anything is possible in their unreasonable and bizarre way of thinking.
As daft as it seems I actually think that Ofcom have told Cellcast to tone down the shows on SKY but continue as before on freeview as more minors are likely to be watching or be offended by the SKY content.
This would have been an order from Ofcom hence the reason for no mention of this in any of the bulletins and I reckon Babestation are too embarrassed to tell us the real truth hence the reason it's most likely that their story about it being commercial and of there own free choice is basically a bullshit lie in order to save face
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 27-05-2015 00:50
Utter shite on Tamestation tonight - I know, shocking!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 27-05-2015 00:55
Danni claims they smashed the numbers the other night, but I wouldn't be surprised if the SKY numbers are way down. Also, many of the women don't look happy anymore on the SKY channels...
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 27-05-2015 00:58
(27-05-2015 00:21 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Well mr mystery for many years you and me have witnessed the cynical and totally baffling tactics deployed at Ofcom HQ having had many a long winded discussion on that part of the forum and with ofcom just about anything is possible in their unreasonable and bizarre way of thinking.
As daft as it seems I actually think that Ofcom have told Cellcast to tone down the shows on SKY but continue as before on freeview as more minors are likely to be watching or be offended by the SKY content.
This would have been an order from Ofcom hence the reason for no mention of this in any of the bulletins and I reckon Babestation are too embarrassed to tell us the real truth hence the reason it's most likely that their story about it being commercial and of there own free choice is basically a bullshit lie in order to save face
While I agree that Ofcon are a law unto themselves, I don't see any logic in what you suggest, not that logic & Ofcon deserve to be used in the same sentence!
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mrmann - 27-05-2015 01:02
^ Ofcom has the power to make shit up as they go.
Years past, after originally banning the women from swearing on the mic, they allowed them to swear up a storm on the SKY channels, then within a very short time, the women were no longer allowed to swear again (Looking at you Michelle Thorne) lol.
So, that to me says that Ofcom can say one thing, and then next week decide to go back on what they agreed on.
It's possible that they told the producers at Babestation, that because the cucumber session was too naughty, that from now on they need to be tamer on SKY. Maybe they threatened them, by saying they'd be much more willing to fine them for things they were lenient on in the past, if the producers didn't obey them.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 27-05-2015 01:17
(27-05-2015 00:55 )mrmann Wrote: SNIP
. Also, many of the women don't look happy anymore on the SKY channels...
As opposed to looking ecstatic on FV?
Remember that the FV 'exclusive' only accounts for a small proportion of TS1's output - The vast majority of Tamestation's output is the exact same shite on both platforms
|