(29-04-2012 21:30 )Scottishbloke Wrote:  2 more months, fuck me that's an eternity, 2 more weeks would be bad enough, nevermind months

(30-04-2012 15:28 )cmiller Wrote:  did she misbehave on the nightshow? is this 8-week thing enforced by RLC as punishment? because they have an 8-week delay on their videos being uploaded and i don't believe in coincidences.

(13-02-2012 09:28 )twistedmango Wrote:  Pretty sure that if you had £100k of your own money taken from you in a fine you'd err on the side of caution too.
Er, Lucy Summers was the reason RLC got fined.

(13-02-2012 18:32 )mr mystery Wrote:  

(13-02-2012 14:30 )twistedmango Wrote:  

(13-02-2012 13:59 )mr mystery Wrote:  Lucy Summers was not the girl that had the accidental slip while using the hand thong technique when the girl lost her balance and flashed resulting in Ofcom finding Playboy "in breach" , and that's a fact .

Then i bow down to your superior knowledge of the facts. I was told that it was LS, albeit unsubstantiated, who was the reason RLC got the fine, hand thong or otherwise, clearly i am wrong.

mr mystery Wrote
Well twistedmango whoever told you that is wrong , for a start like i have said 1 of the "in breach" rulings against Playboy/RLC that contributed to the large fine was made by another girl that lost her balance while sitting on the back of a lounger style seat using the hand thong technique , she removed her covering hand to save herself falling backward , so ended up revealing all , this incident is on Ofcoms website and is described in detail , the girl responsible for this "in breach" ruling was not Lucy S , Lucy did say herself on this forum that she had been the target of malicious complaints , so it's possible that she could have been one of the girls that was mentioned in other "in breach" rulings
I don't think it is fair to single 1 RLC girl as being responsible for the large fine , the fine was for a combination of things , the complaints and "in breach" rulings were made against various girls and on different nights .
Ofcom say themselves that they look at past compliance records of company's found "in breech" when deciding what sort of punishment or fine to dish out , past discretion's contribute to higher fines , Playboy have a bad past compliance record , Bangbabe and Elite TV program's both got found in breach while using Playboys licence thus contributing to Playboy's bad compliance record , Playboy themselves have been found "in breach" many times in the past for wrong doings on their own encrypted channels , all this was taken into account when dishing out the last fine , so it's unfair to say the girls producers etc at RLC are solely responsible for the fine , the overall fine was a combination of many things and not just because of what was shown on the RLC channels .

(30-04-2012 17:06 )Tintin Wrote:  mr mystery cheers for all the info, I missed that

When did these so called slips happen (date)??

(30-04-2012 15:28 )cmiller Wrote:  did she misbehave on the nightshow? is this 8-week thing enforced by RLC as punishment? because they have an 8-week delay on their videos being uploaded and i don't believe in coincidences.

(30-04-2012 22:57 )wilkinss77 Wrote:  

(30-04-2012 15:28 )cmiller Wrote:  did she misbehave on the nightshow? is this 8-week thing enforced by RLC as punishment? because they have an 8-week delay on their videos being uploaded and i don't believe in coincidences.

we don't know, cos RLC won't tell us. it was 12 weeks, but it's been about a month now, so 8 weeks until we see her on nights.