RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 01-07-2015 22:40
^ Can't please all of the people, all of the time (but I agree about the 'replacing' bit)
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - jimmyt73 - 01-07-2015 23:02
(01-07-2015 22:20 )Scottishbloke Wrote: Oh hello..................Looks like full nakedness has returned to BS1 on SKY
If we get the climax session too then jimmy73 might be able to do this
Nah its far too hot to be happy,in any case although its good to see nakedness back on BS1,i do still feel like ive been missing some decent shows through no fault of my own,as to whether there will be a proper climax line on Sky after almost three months,somehow i doubt it,particularly as the newly renamed channel seems to have applied for an OFCOM license and im guessing that proper fake climaxing is not allowed under current regulations,also hope the data collection/splitting policy has ended,in summary good that nudity has returned on 906,but i will reserve judgement on the rest of the recent policy decisions which have left me and alot of other Sky only viewers wondering why the stronger stints have been deliberately kept from us for no valid reason.
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 01-07-2015 23:13
It does seem to be back to how things were earlier this year - I wonder if they are trying to maximise income as they anticipate an influx of ex Sin-TV/RLC viewers, given that it's happened tonight, of all nights?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 01-07-2015 23:14
It's all a bit strange, Sky 906 changes it's name to Babenation, it loses it's Dutch licence, a non Cellcast company is now the new licencee of 906 with a Ofcom licence and the nudity returns .
Maybe the new licencee wants nudity lol .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 01-07-2015 23:19
^ Was there anything to say that the lack of nudity was down to 'Ofcon', though? I have always assumed that it was a Cellcast decsion?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 01-07-2015 23:22
(01-07-2015 23:14 )mr mystery Wrote: SNIP
Maybe the new licencee wants nudity lol .
So, SB's the new licence holder, then?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Scottishbloke - 01-07-2015 23:22
(01-07-2015 23:13 )Censorship :-( Wrote: It does seem to be back to how things were earlier this year - I wonder if they are trying to maximise income as they anticipate an influx of ex Sin-TV/RLC viewers, given that it's happened tonight, of all nights?
We'll see what happens if they start airing nude 2 for 1's again on 906 then we'll know that they mean business, yeah it looks like they might be the channel to keep an eye on with regards to ramping it all up again
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - mr mystery - 01-07-2015 23:26
@ Censorship:-( i Shouldn't think the no nudity rule was down to Ofcom, Ofcom didn't regulate the channel, now Ofcom do regulate the channel the nudity is back, i think there was more to it than we know .
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 01-07-2015 23:35
^ Not having $ky, these channel numbers mean nothing to me, so I'm confused Is/was 906 TS1? If so, did it have a Dutch licence on $ky, just like TS1 on FV?
RE: Babestation - General Chat & Discussion - Censorship :-( - 01-07-2015 23:45
According to Lori, there was a naked ban on $ky, which has now been lifted, so, Cellcast decision, as we thought.
(And we know that everything she says is the truth! )
|